To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
he didnt use a bomb he used GUNS
The point is that confiscating guns would not have prevented this.
The point is that confiscating guns would not have prevented this.
I'm disgusted that a person can be on the terrorist watch list and still buy firearms.
No.
Your lack of logic is laughable. If it wasn't so pitiful.
Any person from almost any country in the world can get on a plane to visit the US on 2 week vacation and once here, can obtain an arsenal of weapons with no difficulty at all and then shoot and bomb people.
Easy. The killer is not mentally ill. He is jihadist.
No one has a crystal ball to say yea or nay. However, according to your own logic on immigrants, the fewer the guns, the less likely an act of terror.
Yea, that's what I find reprehensible about the coverage so far too.
if anyone should realize anything is that the NSA, FBI, and every other anti-terrorism agency did their jobs 100%, what led to this shooting were American gun laws in Florida and across the USA.
And immigration serves no US purpose.
I agree. While attempted mass killings might not reduce in terms of occurrence, the number of people killed in each attempt would be lower if the gunman didn't have access to weapons designed for warfare.
Sorry but a bunch of drunk people packing in clubs is probably a bad idea that would lead to more deaths in the long run.What led to this shooting was bigotry and religious fanaticism.
What the gun laws did was to guarantee a high death toll, by making sure no one could stop the attacker until then police finally got their rears in gear and did so. This is proof that the best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to have good guys with guns -- but most of the good guys, thanks to gun-control foolishness, were disarmed.
Any gay with good sense will respond to this by seeking out the local Pink Pistols, getting a gun, getting trained, and fighting to get the laws changed so next time instead of fifty people dead there will be a tenth of that, or less. After all, the attacker was armed with a common hunting weapon and could only shoot one person at a time.
http://www.pinkpistols.org/
The gunman didn't have any "weapons designed for warfare". What he had was a common hunting rifle, one recommended by experts as a good weapon for home defense. which shoots one round each time the trigger is pulled.
gun laws were rolled back during moron George w bush----the ultimate chicken hawk----Obama has been trying to bring common sense gun laws back---but repubs have had a majority control for many years which is why things are so fucked....Hillary knows she needs to take control of Congress for things to change. Senate is possible this year---but congress is still a bunch of white trash hillbillies.
So the two major groups responsible for these killings are:
1/ NRA (national rifle association) because they opposed tough background checks
2/ Saudi Arabia because they export terror ideas
The gunman didn't have any "weapons designed for warfare". What he had was a common hunting rifle, one recommended by experts as a good weapon for home defense. which shoots one round each time the trigger is pulled.
But how can he got guns so easily with the mental instability like that ??
Weak background checks before selling guns therefore NRA is responsible for the killings.
The point is that confiscating guns would not have prevented this.
