BostonPirate
Ijubbinatti
I designated this one as an Ontopic thread to keep the flame levels down.
heres the story and the statement....
based on my prior comments in threads here it is clear that I tend to agree with the naacp. I want to clearly state that the picture in my avatar is me, a white man, and my family has a murky history in regards to slavery. This may overshadow my opinions in that I have a strog desire to right what I think was a wrong my forefathers engaged in... so I have disclosed my personal impetus for having interest in this topic.
that being said....
I have been an activist and I know that if someone brings a sign to the rally that is not kosher, the organizers ask them to get rid of it.... sometimes just the people in the crowd castigate the people carrying the signs enough to get them to realize they are out of sync with the rest of the group.
I don;t see that happening here with these teabagger protesters... If anything, the pictures of the crown around the signs show an agreeing atmosphere.
It also can't be lost that there is a certain lingo... take our country back...
well take it back from whom? Bacchman calls it a gangster regime and the crowd roars.... all this language packed with inuendo, and a membership virtually devoid of anyone not white makes it clear to me that the people who said they would never vote for a black man based solely on his race have found their political home.
it is not that they are being overtaxed. the american tax burden is lower than it has been in sixty years, so that is a trumped up lie. If they could decide whther they thought he was either a fascist or a socialist, it would help me think they had a real political agenda... but all i see is alot of angry white people yelling about that black president, calling him anything that comes to mind.
please guys....
be respectfull here and speak to the article not each other. This is a hot potato and we don't need to hack each other apart to say how we feel about it.
thanks in advance!
B. Pirate
heres the story and the statement....
“We take no issue with the Tea Party. We believe in freedom of assembly and people raising their voices in a democracy,” NAACP President and CEO Ben Jealous said in a statement.
“We take issue with the Tea Party’s continued tolerance for bigotry and bigoted statements. The time has come for them to accept the responsibility that comes with influence and make clear there is no space for racism and anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry in their movement,” Jealous added.
Leaders of the conservative movement reacted to the NAACP action with swift and angry derision.
“I am disinclined to take lectures on racial sensitivity from a group that insists on calling black people, ‘Colored,’” Mark Williams, national spokesman of the Tea Party Express, told CNN. “The Tea Party [movement] is about the constitution of this country…[and] ensuring equality for each and every individual human being.”
based on my prior comments in threads here it is clear that I tend to agree with the naacp. I want to clearly state that the picture in my avatar is me, a white man, and my family has a murky history in regards to slavery. This may overshadow my opinions in that I have a strog desire to right what I think was a wrong my forefathers engaged in... so I have disclosed my personal impetus for having interest in this topic.
that being said....
I have been an activist and I know that if someone brings a sign to the rally that is not kosher, the organizers ask them to get rid of it.... sometimes just the people in the crowd castigate the people carrying the signs enough to get them to realize they are out of sync with the rest of the group.
I don;t see that happening here with these teabagger protesters... If anything, the pictures of the crown around the signs show an agreeing atmosphere.
It also can't be lost that there is a certain lingo... take our country back...
well take it back from whom? Bacchman calls it a gangster regime and the crowd roars.... all this language packed with inuendo, and a membership virtually devoid of anyone not white makes it clear to me that the people who said they would never vote for a black man based solely on his race have found their political home.
it is not that they are being overtaxed. the american tax burden is lower than it has been in sixty years, so that is a trumped up lie. If they could decide whther they thought he was either a fascist or a socialist, it would help me think they had a real political agenda... but all i see is alot of angry white people yelling about that black president, calling him anything that comes to mind.
please guys....
be respectfull here and speak to the article not each other. This is a hot potato and we don't need to hack each other apart to say how we feel about it.
thanks in advance!
B. Pirate































