Obama cancels events on Thursday & Friday

[NickCole]

Thank you gc64s1, he is a slippery little devil isn't he? He pisses on my shoes, then both he and Nick try to convince me its raining!

I didn't try to convince you it's raining; I pointed out where you'd been wrong. It's all right here in the thread.

It's small of you to pretend justapixel pissed on your shoes and I tried to convince you it's raining. If that's what supporting Obama does to a man's integrity, you're welcome to it.

 

[smelter]

I didn't try to convince you it's raining; I pointed out where you'd been wrong. It's all right here in the thread.

You were wrong, smelter.

It's no sin.

But it's very small of you to pretend justapixel pissed on your shoes and I tried to convince you it's raining. If that's what supporting Obama does to a man's integrity, you're welcome to it.

Nicky, Nicky, Nicky! Please do me a favor and step back from your conclusion and review the posts one more time. You're digging that hole deeper and deeper. Eventually you'll have to climb out and admit you're wrong! This is becoming more laughable by the minute.

Question: why did he post Swerve's comments and not acknowlege they were his.

Question: why did he say the above comments (plural) belong to Spensed when he only had one comment and the rest belonged to someone else (Swerve).

He was trying to obfuscate and obviously it worked on you!

 

[smelter]

I am confused as to why people debate others with ridiculous arguments? If you come across as not being able to refute their claims for not responding then who cares if they think they have won? They are the ones with such a pathetic view and standpoint! They can win in their head if they want to. In the end they will feel they won the argument anyway so what does it matter?

I say just let them be "right" and don't waste your time. I personally feel like I am declining in my intelligence when I battle wits with a mound of rocks.

You're right of course .... but I'm an old man and I have so little time left to have fun!

 

[NickCole]

Nicky, Nicky, Nicky! Please do me a favor and step back from your conclusion and review the posts one more time. You're digging that hole deeper and deeper. Eventually you'll have to climb out and admit you're wrong! This is becoming more laughable by the minute.

Question: why did he post Swerve's comments and not acknowlege they were his.

Question: why did he say the above comments (plural) belong to Spensed when he only had one comment and the rest belonged to someone else (Swerve).

He was trying to obfuscate and obviously it worked on you!

We've already gone round about this.

It's all in the thread.

Justapixel posted one quote marking it "1)" and another quote marking it "2)". It was obvious (at least to me) that he was in some way distinquishing the two. When Spenced responded in his assinine way, justapixel pointed out that the quote he made his comment about had been his own (Spenced's). You're right justapixel didn't detail it by saying the second quote had been swerve's; maybe justapixel thought it irrelevant since swerve wasn't part of the conversation, or maybe he forgot. That, however, is beside the point as this relates to the part you played. You posted that the quote wasn't written by Spensed -- you didn't say that part of it wasn't written by Spensed. And the truth is, the "1)" quote was a verbatim copy of what Spensed wrote about McCain suspending his campaign. Justapixel's only point was to catch Spenced in his hypocrisy, which he did. Unfortunately he's also caught both of you being unable to own up to the truth.

 

[smelter]

We've already gone round about this.

It's all in the thread.

Justapixel posted one quote marking it "1)" and another quote marking it "2)". When Spenced responded in his assinine way, justapixel pointed out that the quote he made his comment about had been his own (Spenced's). You're right justapixel didn't detail it by saying the second quote had been swerve's; maybe justapixel thought it irrelevant since swerve wasn't part of the conversation. That, however, is not the point as this relates to the part you played. You posted that the quote wasn't written by Spensed -- you didn't say that part of it wasn't written by Spensed. And the truth is, the "1)" quote was a verbatim copy of what Spensed wrote about McCain suspending his campaign. Justapixel's only point was to catch Spenced in his hypocrisy, which he did. Unfortunately he's also caught both of you being unable to own up to the truth.

You still haven't answered the questions I posed to you. Look at post 19 one more time and explain to me how justapixel was being forthright with that post.

His attribution to Spensed encompassed the entire quote regardless of how he tried to mask it with his obscure "1)" and "2)". He said Spensed had made those comments (plural). Its that simple!

 

[smelter]

Here is post 19 in its entirety.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spensed
Thank you, once again, for showing us the true meaning of knee-jerk response. LOL.


Quote:
1) Hopefully, the public will see it as a sign of weakness, lack of preparation and inability to deal with more than one thing at a time.

2) So now we're supposed to SUSPEND Presidential campaigns due to crisis???

WHAT about the 2 wars we're losing???

What about the HURRICANE that devastated parts of Texas???

GIVE ME A BREAK...

I want a President that can MULTI TASK...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The comments I posted above are from Spensed.

I simply cut and pasted them out of the thread where we discussed McCain suspending his campaign.

I just wanted to prove your double standard. LOL.

 

[NickCole]

You still haven't answered the questions I posed to you. Look at post 19 one more time and explain to me how justapixel was being forthright with that post.

As I've said, maybe he thought explaining it in detail was irrelevant. Maybe he forgot he'd used two different people's quotes. Maybe he made a mistake and thought both were by Spenced. I don't know. He might not know. It doesn't matter because one of the quotes that Spenced responded to with his assinine, "Thank you, once again, for showing us the true meaning of knee-jerk response. LOL." was his own. Showing Spenced his own hypocrisy was justapixel's point, and he accomplished that.

His attribution to Spensed encompassed the entire quote regardless of how he tried to mask it with his obscure "1)" and "2)". He said Spensed had made those comments (plural). Its that simple!

If you want to hide behind that, of course that's your choice.

In my opinion a man of integrity would admit he was wrong in saying, "Spensed, I did a search and found the quote was from Swerve. I can see why he was confused .... your names both start with an 'S'! " and doing a victory lap with your buddy Spenced while ridiculing justapixel. "The quote" wasn't from swerve; the "1)" of the quote was, in fact, verbatim from Spensed.

 

[smelter]

As I've said, maybe he thought explaining it in detail was irrelevant. Maybe he forgot he'd used two different people's quotes. Maybe he made a mistake and thought both were by Spenced. I don't know. He might not know. It doesn't matter because one of the quotes that Spenced responded to with his assinine, "Thank you, once again, for showing us the true meaning of knee-jerk response. LOL." was his own. Showing Spenced his own hypocrisy was justapixel's point, and he accomplished that. And it was brilliant.





If you want to hide behind that, of course that's your choice.

In my opinion a man of integrity would admit he was wrong in saying, "Spensed, I did a search and found the quote was from Swerve. I can see why he was confused .... your names both start with an 'S'! " and doing a victory lap with your buddy Spenced. The "1)" of the quote was, in fact, verbatim from Spensed.

I did a search for two key words (which happened to be 'Multi Task') ... thats how I found it belonged to Swerve.

To expect I should have checked for keywords in every line is ridiculous on its face. If justapixel was trying to confuse, yes, it worked brilliantly. To claim that I'm hiding behind anything is not so brilliant. If anyone was hiding it was justapixel who hid behind his dishonest cut and paste post. Only he knows for sure and I doubt he will ever own up to it.

 

[snapcat]

I see we're all still trying to figure out who posted what and when.

 

[smelter]

I see we're all still trying to figure out who posted what and when.

Yes we are! I think this ship has finally run aground so we must either wait for high tide or abandon it on the beach. LOL, I'm leaning toward the latter!

 

[snapcat]

Lord, we're on page four on a rollercoaster ride to hell! LOL!

 

[smelter]

^ Thanks Marley .... I needed that!

 

[smelter]

Did anyone hear that Obama's grandmother is ill and he will not be on the trail Thursday or Friday?

No, I didn't .... why doesn't somebody start a thread so we can talk about it!

 

[MidnightPrism]

This is like the most popular thread I have ever started in all my years here. I feel special.

 

[fireside]

There is a world of difference between the two events.

McCain suspends his campaign = bad.

Obama suspends his campaign = good.

Oops. Didn't see this before I posted.

Sorry; didn't mean to step on your post.

There's something severely wrong with both of you.

 

[NickCole]

This just goes to show you how well they train supporters at the Republican Spin Factory. Justapixel and Nickcole are tenacious enough to stay on the Titanic even as the last few lifeboats are being cast off.

I'm not a Republican, and over the last few years I've been one of the most tenacious here in criticizing Republicans. And I've never been a McCain supporter.

Why do you continue to mischaracterize me?

It's like in Oz when Dorothy looked behind the curtain and saw the real wizard. Except here they continue riding the bike, speaking into the megaphone, and cuing the fog machine even though we're poking them saying "We can see you."

McCain is essentially the same man he was 8 years ago. The media has changed its narrative about him and Obama has effectively re-defined the public's perception with hundreds of millions of dollars of ads and ground presence. McCain's not my favorite candidate and I disagree with many of his positions, but I'm not swayed by the fashion of the moment. And, as I've been over the past 8 years, I reman disappointed that so many Americans are so easily swayed by marketing.

Obama, like the Wizard of Oz, is the one manuvering controls behind the curtain who is fooling most people. His supposedly being "pro gay rights" and refusing to say anything to Florida African American voters about Amendment 2, while he's been there the past two days, is easy proof positive. I saw the same Wizard of Oz thing in Bush when his approvals were in the 90s.

 

[NickCole]

Did anyone hear that Obama's grandmother is ill and he will not be on the trail Thursday or Friday?

I hear you saying it but, like so much else Obama supporters say, it's not true.

Obama cancelled two appearances on Thursday in Wisconsin and Iowa, where he's well ahead, and added one for Thursday in the closely fought state of Indiana. He will be on the trail Thursday, as he remained Tuesday in the vital state of Florida where he continued tossing gays under the bus.

 

[NickCole]

Nick Cole, is there any thread you haven't hijacked yet?

How do you define hijack?

My posts address the issues raised in the thread.

 

[grantt]

It is very sad indeed that Obama's grandmother appears to be dying. According to the news "she raised him while his mother was traveling the world" Also, "she had to give up basics to make sure her grandchild had things". Just what was Obama's mother doing, and why did she not support her child during this time in his life?

 

[Spensed]

I'm not a Republican, and over the last few years I've been one of the most tenacious here in criticizing Republicans. And I've never been a McCain supporter.

Why do you continue to mischaracterize me?

Maybe he reads your posts? LOL.