It's funny, scary almost, how this man could reach the highest office in the land, go to schools with 5% acceptance rates, become a Senator of a large state, teach at the most prestigious law school in the land and not have ONE CREDENTIAL to show for it...??
1. Proof of citizenship? His "official" birth certificate is sealed and Hawaii is hell bent on NOT releasing it
2. Went to most prestigious undergrad college in the world? No traceable test score to show for it
3. He got into the MOST prestigious law school in the world? Not an LSAT score or stunning transcript to show for it
4. He was the Editor of the most prestigious Law Review in the world? He DID NOT WRITE a single article for the review and there is NO evidence that he even edited anything..
5. Scholarly evidence outside of transcripts of value? None. Not even his college thesis has been published. Not even a class essay.
6. His legislative records from his time in Illinois? -Sealed.
7. His accomplishments post school as a 'community organizer?' Undocumented? No Letters of Rec
8. His work at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge? Mostly unavailable .
9. His tenure in the Senate? Voted present..nothing of real importance
10. His academic career as a (quasi) professor of Constitutional Law? Nothing significant.. no one has ever commented on his research/academic contributions while there. In fact, he wasn't event a professor. And why the hell did they appoint him with no in field experience ?
11. Legal credentials? Law license was voluntarily suspende. What attorney who graduates with a law degree from Harvard and passess the BAR exam surrenders their law licenses? Retired lawyers still have valid license
Say what you want people but something doesn't add up. It's funny how his transcripts aren't a big deal, but everyone else has to fork theirs over when applying for something government related? Ever try to apply for a government job? Try it, and see how fast they ask for your transcripts. Ever apply for a Fulbright, AmeriCrops, Peace Corps, TeachForAmerica ???? YOU WILL NEED TRANSCRIPTS bitches.. For some reason, qualifications doesn't apply to Barack and the elite?
Did anyone, though, ever prove that George W. Bush ever even attended one class at either Harvard or Yale?
Meaning that while records can be disclosed, even that doesn't prove much.
And while there is always a possibility that everyone in the world is full of b.s., and that conspiracy theories will always rule the day in the USA, we would have to acknowledge that Bush seemed a bit stupid and uneducated. While Obama...well, not so much.
So with or without documentation of college records, often, a person of intelligence (or not) can be spotted anyway.
But one wonders how Obama's college roommate at Columbia can hate Obama so much and know anything of him while not indeed also acknowledging that he was in fact his roommate at Columbia.
I mean, for a former college roommate to hate your policies and politics so much while not adding the "fact" that he couldn't have been Obama's roommate because Obama never attended school is sort of curious.
You would think that would the first thing such a former roommate might mention. The line, "I was not Obama's roommate at Columbia because Obama never attended Columbia and therefore I couldn't have possibly ever been his roommate".
But no. The former roommate who despises all of Obama's politics doesn't state that or make that claim.
In fact, he clearly acknowledges that they were roommates at Columbia....because Obama went to Columbia as did the roommate who hates him.
So when someone who hates you can't even disprove that you attended a particular university, well, that sort of testimony carries some weight one would think.
