- Joined
- Sep 27, 2004
- Posts
- 18,135
- Reaction score
- 311
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Lexington
- Website
- hometown.aol.com
It's sad to see the Hillary Camp embracing such radical and racist attitudes. Ferraro has a track record of patently offensive and racist remarks.
Very sad, indeed!
From Politico ...
From AmericaBlog ....
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/11/204337/675/349/474608
Why doesn't the Hillary Camp "reject and denounce" these statements?
Very sad, indeed!
From Politico ...
A Ferraro flashback
"If Jesse Jackson were not black, he wouldn't be in the race," she said.
Really. The cite is an April 15, 1988 Washington Post story (byline: Howard Kurtz), available only on Nexis.
Here's the full context:
Placid of demeanor but pointed in his rhetoric, Jackson struck out repeatedly today against those who suggest his race has been an asset in the campaign. President Reagan suggested Tuesday that people don't ask Jackson tough questions because of his race. And former representative Geraldine A. Ferraro (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that because of his "radical" views, "if Jesse Jackson were not black, he wouldn't be in the race."
Asked about this at a campaign stop in Buffalo, Jackson at first seemed ready to pounce fiercely on his critics. But then he stopped, took a breath, and said quietly, "Millions of Americans have a point of view different from" Ferraro's.
Discussing the same point in Washington, Jackson said, "We campaigned across the South . . . without a single catcall or boo. It was not until we got North to New York that we began to hear this from Koch, President Reagan and then Mrs. Ferraro . . . . Some people are making hysteria while I'm making history."
From AmericaBlog ....
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/11/204337/675/349/474608
Markos found a Geraldine Ferraro interview from February 27, 2008, on FOX News' John Gibson's radio show, where she said pretty much the exact same thing she said this week about Obama and race. The thing is, it's nearly verbatim the same thing. These are talking points that she rehearsed, and/or was given. The question is by whom?FERRARO: If Barack Obama were a white man, would we be talking about this as a potential real problem for Hillary?Then look at what she said earlier this week:
If he were a woman...
GIBSON: You mean if he were John Edwards?
FERRARO: If he were a woman of any color, would he be in this position that he's in, absolutely not.
GIBSON: Geraldine, are you playing the race card?
FERRARO: No, and that's the problem. Every time you say the truth - I'm the first person, John, and you know how honest I am, I am the first person who will say in 1984 if my name were Gerard instead of Geraldine, I would never have been picked as the vice presidential candidate.If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position.Now look at what she said earlier today:"If in 1984 my name was Gerard Ferraro instead of Geraldine Ferraro, I would never have been the nominee for VP."In politics, those cute little zingers tend to be things you practice in advance. They're intentional, they're talking points. Ferraro planned this entire line of attack over 2 weeks ago. The question is whether Hillary's campaign planned it for her, with her.
Why doesn't the Hillary Camp "reject and denounce" these statements?
























