The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Oh No! It's Another Thread About Circumcision.

Age and foreskin status ...

  • Under 30 and cut

    Votes: 24 16.9%
  • Under 30 and uncut

    Votes: 21 14.8%
  • 30-50 and cut

    Votes: 36 25.4%
  • 30-50 and uncut

    Votes: 16 11.3%
  • Over 50 and cut

    Votes: 31 21.8%
  • Over 50 and uncut

    Votes: 14 9.9%
  • I can't tell whether I'm cut or uncut

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    142
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

Sure, but how often do they flip-flop on this?
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

Just because someone put a video on the interwebz doesn't make the circumcision any more beneficial.

I suppose the OP believes in penis growing techniques too.

And Nigerian oil money coming his way.
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

The foreskin advocates have been distorting all scientific evidence for their cause. They have been saying that it is dangerous, not beneficial and on the decline in the U.S. But this latest evidence not only contradicts what we've been led to believe but equates infant circumcision to vaccination. At this point the foreskin activists will sound like the Tea Party global warming science deniers.

Oh...this thread again....
Uncut dicks are unsanitary.
That was the big conclusion.

I have a cut dick and enjoy the head of it all ready to go no messy foldy smelly skin to peel back...prefer also cut dicks on my partners.

Any questions.

My position is clear and I have the balls to come out and say it whether you like it or not.

Deal with it.

My opinions are not for the faint of heart.


:O
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

Those of us equipped with the natural look know how to wash throughly avoiding unpleasant odors.

Far too much OCD cumming from the penis mutilation proponents.....
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

^Stick to your own balls.


Greece is a disaster!!!!!!! But the EU pumps the money into the Greece and hopes for cohesion....

Greece is a failure ...a ruin atop a ruin.....
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

^Skinless response...appropriate for those minus their foreskin.:D
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

People that live in countries were cutting is the norm will prefer it, as its what they are raised around. The majority (70% of the male population of the world) will either not care or have prefer uncut because its what we are use to.
This website makes it seem like there is a debate out there because most of the site is American, with a few of us being European - still most of the world is uncut and we get by just fine. Some of the world is cut, and that is fine. Lets try and not pretend either gives us an advantage and accept our opinions are probably formed because we come from cultures that are dominant one way or the other and it effects what we prefer.
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

It is very clear that America is at the cutting edge in high technology....whereas, penis mutilation might well suggest that the United States remains in the Dark Ages....
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

On a more serious note it is risky to assume that circumcision reduces the risk of contracting HIV....when the circumcised avoid using a condom...a false sense of security....
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

Oh this debate. Uncut dicks are also grotesque and repulsive.
To me a circumcised penis has far more eye appeal. Foreskin does little, actually nothing for me.
However, I think that my tastes are based upon what I grew up wanting, another guys cock to pleasure.

My stand or position is based solely upon the rights of the owner of the foreskin, who in most cases can not speak for himself.
A baby boy's penis should not be the object used to make any money, if that skin wasn't meant to be there I believe that nature would do the proper job in modifying a modern man's penis.

If I had my way, foreskins would be a thing of the past, let nature take it's course, someday they might disappear.
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

The CDC, AMA, UNAIDS, and WHO all recommend circumcision to combat HIV AIDS.
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

^A false sense of security fostered by reliance on unproven theories....better rely on a condom as a safer sex practice.
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

The CDC, AMA, UNAIDS, and WHO all recommend circumcision to combat HIV AIDS.
I am aware of this and at the risk of sounding paranoid or at the least like a conspiratorialist, I really don't trust all that they say.
Question all authority... Thoreau ? not sure who said it, but I like it.
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

Well...would you rather have the "bi" thread? I actually prefer this.....bi is a lie!!!
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

^Suck my cut dick faggot


:badgrin:
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

^
Stick it in yer rerpot (whatever that is)!
 
Re: Mayo Clinic rerpot: benefits of circumcision far outweigh the risks

The CDC, AMA, UNAIDS, and WHO all recommend circumcision to combat HIV AIDS.

Only in heterosexual males, and again the stats are a little off as there are many economic and social factors to circumcision in Africa where these studies are held. No major medical organization recommends either universal circumcision for all infant males or banning of it.
I will keep saying it again and again, the only reason American's have such strong opinions on it that they grew up in a world where nearly everyone (77-83%) of men were cut. The rest of the worlds population (the 70% of all men in the world aged 15+) and the women around those men, probably prefer uncut because its what they are use to.
 
Back
Top