The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Oh No! It's Another Thread About Circumcision.

Age and foreskin status ...

  • Under 30 and cut

    Votes: 24 16.9%
  • Under 30 and uncut

    Votes: 21 14.8%
  • 30-50 and cut

    Votes: 36 25.4%
  • 30-50 and uncut

    Votes: 16 11.3%
  • Over 50 and cut

    Votes: 31 21.8%
  • Over 50 and uncut

    Votes: 14 9.9%
  • I can't tell whether I'm cut or uncut

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    142
Re: Oh No. It's Another Thread About Circumcision

That will make them more dangerous, because the dirt will remain there like odourless death :cool: :mrgreen: 8-)

Still, no nose hair to trim, and no lingering boogers. That's gotta be worth something.
 
Re: Oh No. It's Another Thread About Circumcision

Still, no nose hair to trim, and no lingering boogers. That's gotta be worth something.

The same sort of logic that would justify apotemnophilia in general.

2898516-mountain-biking-with-a-scratched-up-leg.jpg


Imagine the joy of outdoors activities without scratches and stings all over :rolleyes:
 
The tragedy of a botched circumcision

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-47292307

"It quickly became apparent that what had just happened was a catastrophe... I died in 2015, not now."
Alex was an intelligent and popular 23-year-old with no history of mental illness. Lesley [his mother] could not understand why he would have wanted to take his own life.

His email explained how the foreskin of his penis had been surgically removed two years before. This is commonly known as circumcision, but Alex had come to believe it should be regarded as "male genital mutilation".


In England, the NHS advises topical steroids and stretching techniques - and circumcision as a last resort.

But Alex went to a 'Dr' (now disgraced) in Canada

"He was in so much pain that it hurt to do normal physical activity," says Lesley. "He was a keen skier and snowboarder so you can imagine the pain he was in."

Alex also wrote about experiencing erectile dysfunction, and burning and itching sensations, particularly from a scar which sat where his frenulum was removed.

Most of the men circumcised in the UK are either Muslim or Jewish, as circumcision is regarded as an important part of their religions.
People who question circumcision are sometimes accused of being anti-Semitic or Islamophobic
 
Re: The tragedy of a botched circumcision

IDK, there's usually more than a singular reason for suicide, or that's what the experts say. Blaming it on circumcision allows the mother to escape any introspection.

This guy was wound up so tight he couldn't discuss anything with anyone. Then he get's his dick cut, non-emergency, without bothering to do any research at all because his internet is down. This story has holes.
 
Re: The tragedy of a botched circumcision

Agreed. Just dig deeper to find the truth. Most anti circ "victims" have much deeper mental issues.
 
Re: The tragedy of a botched circumcision

Agreed. Just dig deeper to find the truth. Most anti circ "victims" have much deeper mental issues.

Those who, not being Jewish, are so vehemently 'pro-circ', as if it were anything but an arbitrary mutilation, truly have bottomless mental issues... and maybe some hygiene issues too.
 
This is a sad tale, but it has little to do with infant circumcision which is done with out the consent of the penis owner.
 
Re: The tragedy of a botched circumcision

Those who, not being Jewish, are so vehemently 'pro-circ', as if it were anything but an arbitrary mutilation, truly have bottomless mental issues... and maybe some hygiene issues too.

People who think the best way to keep a body part clean is to cut it all off DEFINITELY have a lot of hygiene issues.
 
This is a sad tale, but it has little to do with infant circumcision which is done with out the consent of the penis owner.

And that is the only argument against circumcision we need.

(Apart from the fact that it doesn't prevent STDs. The oft-quoted "reduction" in infection of 15% or 30% doesn't help as it would need to be 100% to be of any use.)
 
And that is the only argument against circumcision we need.

(Apart from the fact that it doesn't prevent STDs. The oft-quoted "reduction" in infection of 15% or 30% doesn't help as it would need to be 100% to be of any use.)

That reduction is general in all the population around the world, or only in one or a couple of countries? Is that reduction truly related to circumcision, or to some other practices and habits of a population who also happen to follow the habit of circumcising?
 
I wasn't given the choice when I was born. We didn't have our son done, but he wound up having an issue and had to be done as a married adult.
I have a friend who has phimosis - he really should have something done but doesn't see the need at 23.
He doesn't retract so it takes him quite a passionate effort to attain orgasm, but attain it he does.

He doesn't have any malodorous tones even though he doesn't retract.
 
I wasn't given the choice when I was born. We didn't have our son done, but he wound up having an issue and had to be done as a married adult.
I have a friend who has phimosis - he really should have something done but doesn't see the need at 23.
He doesn't retract so it takes him quite a passionate effort to attain orgasm, but attain it he does.

He doesn't have any malodorous tones even though he doesn't retract.

Ah, phimosis! Why do Americans always come up with phimosis as a reason to circumcise?

Phimosis means your foreskin is too narrow for your penis.
The solution to that is to make the foreskin wider, not to remove it.
Just like we fill teeth rather than pull them out.

But of course American doctors will promote circumcision because it's a much more invasive type of surgery, hence bringing in more money.
 
1920px-United_States_Neonatal_Circumcision_Rate_by_Region.svg.png


Circ. rates are much lower in the USA in states that don't provide it through medicaid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision
"Medicaid funding for infant circumcision used to be available in every state, but starting with California in 1982, 18 states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah, and Washington) had eliminated Medicaid coverage of routine (non-therapeutic) circumcision by July 2011.[26] One study in the Midwest of the U.S. found that this had no effect on the newborn circumcision rate but it did affect the demand for circumcision at a later time.[27] Another study, published in early 2009, found a difference in the neonatal male circumcision rate of 24% between states with and without Medicaid coverage. The study was controlled for other factors such as the percentage of Hispanic patients.[28] Other studies have shown that the rise of immigrants from East Asia, Southeast Asian, South Asia and Hispanic South American countries are a large factor in why the rates continue to drop in the US."
 
^ Looking at that map... there is al alternative name for "The South": "The Bible Belt"... but what about "The Midwest"..?

BTW
idys9k0zyz9z.png



"The Northeast" is just rancid "Old America": it's normal to be backwards there :mrgreen:

Poor Mormons & co.: surrounded by infidels.
 
^^
In 'old' America most boys were born on a farm, the mid-wife didn't circumcise them. Jimmy Carter was the first US president born in a hospital, it's pretty safe to say that it's doubtful that his predecessors were cut. My dad and his brothers were born on a farm as well. Circumcision took off when it wasn't an out of pocket expense and was covered by health insurance. States that have health care provided through employers or medicaid programs that pay for infant circ. have the highest rates.
 
^ Since when "old" means "traditional": "old" is merely yesterday's "new" getting rotten, after having usurped the genuinely "old", the "traditional": I always thought circumcision in the USA was more a XXth century fad, boosted after WWII... Cod knows why :rolleyes:
 
Lordy, the histrionics on this thread!

Our penises are ostensibly seen as our most sacred body part. Maybe even a little more so for gay men. But why all the borderline hate for not just the practice of circumcision, but for those who are circumcised themselves? Shouldn't it be either a personal choice or a matter of acceptance? It's like the Church Of The Penis all up in here. Reading these posts is making me feel like some sort of pariah for having a sliced and diced dong.

Regarding the hygiene issue, which is all that I really feel qualified to comment on, if your dick smells funky, you're a pig. No amount of foreskin or lack thereof is going to change that. There are guys who get turned on by such funkiness, but I would rather cross the street than pass one of those fetishists on the sidewalk.

Also, sorry to go off topic, but I feel the need to address something belamo said, and in doing so, to belie my nonplussed reaction to the subject of what other men do with their genital areas.

It just looks better and your dick doesn't smell funky.

Like people with shaved hair smell, and even look, better.

If you are referring to "down there hair", again, this is more subject to the individuals hygiene practices than anything else. In fact, I would argue the opposite; shaving the crotch clean fosters the formation of bacteria more than it inhibits it: hair on the pubes, scrotum and taint acts as a sort of aerator, preventing skin-on-skin contact. The moist, dark areas of the body are a breeding ground for stinky bacteria leavings (ie. body odor). Men have a lot of skin coated junk flopping around down there. Packing it into a pair of tight briefs and/or pants is bad enough, but without ample hair, all that skin area becomes sealed against itself. Add to this the skin irritation that hair removal can sometimes cause, not to mention the presence of tiny tears or pustules which can form if it's not done properly, and you've got the recipe for not only more bacterial odor, but minor, if admittedly inconsequential infection as well. Simply put, your dick will smell like a woman's armpit.

Besides, although it is not porous like the skin, the hair can hold the pleasant scent most soaps and toiletries leave behind. If I'm going to have sex with someone, I make sure to shampoo my bush prior. On more than one occasion I've looked down to see a face pop up from between my thighs to proclaim, "Gee, your taint smells terrific!"

As far as looking better, that, my good Sir, is a matter of opinion.:D
 
^ Since when "old" means "traditional": "old" is merely yesterday's "new" getting rotten, after having usurped the genuinely "old", the "traditional": I always thought circumcision in the USA was more a XXth century fad, boosted after WWII... Cod knows why :rolleyes:

Because Americans don't think things through. Probably one creepy doctor in the 1950's proclaimed that circumcision was, for whatever reason, preferable, and all of a sudden, like a trend, everyone had to put their babies under the knife.

Also, the Jews. They run everything.
 
Back
Top