The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Oh No! It's Another Thread About Circumcision.

Age and foreskin status ...

  • Under 30 and cut

    Votes: 24 16.9%
  • Under 30 and uncut

    Votes: 21 14.8%
  • 30-50 and cut

    Votes: 36 25.4%
  • 30-50 and uncut

    Votes: 16 11.3%
  • Over 50 and cut

    Votes: 31 21.8%
  • Over 50 and uncut

    Votes: 14 9.9%
  • I can't tell whether I'm cut or uncut

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    142
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

^ Really need to change your font color.....
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

Just for the record, although I'm anti-circ I don't support the SF circ ban...
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

The easiest way to get your post ignored? Post in banana yellow. Felt like my eyes were being circumcised. :mad:
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

Well, I might think he was somewhat consistent...

Don't assume all anti-circs are pro-choice. Most anti-circs I know are pro-life. Like I said, although I am anti-circ I don't support this ban because it's too sudden, most people just think it's either being banned for the hell of it, or gay men that have a foreskin fetish are behind it, or (AND THIS SEEMS TO BE THE MOST PREVALENT ACCUSATION FOR SOME REASON) the whole thing is being funded by white supremacist neo-nazis that want to restrict the religious rights of jews. And even if it was banned, people would simply drive outside SF to get the operation. I can see all the circ clinics on the outskirts of SF now. I think there are much effective ways to decrease the circ rate in this country. I've seen men say that they would convert to Judaism JUST SO they could have a circumcised dick if they ban was enforced. To me, that's an insult to the community/religion because the only reason you are apart of it is so you can be satisfied with the way your dick looks, you could care less about the religion and all the other rituals, as long as you're circ'd. To me, that's also disrespectful to the community.
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

Stupid thing to be banning.

There are demonstrated health benefits, if the parents want to do it it should be their choice.
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

Stupid thing to be banning.

There are demonstrated health benefits, if the parents want to do it it should be their choice.

If the health benefits were so drastically beneficial then other men in Europe and Asia would have their dicks rotting off. They're not. Like I said, behaviors are high risk, not penises. Most problems men have with their foreskin in this country are due to human error, they usually just don't ''happen''. Again, I don't support this ban, but I don't like how circ is being promoted as a means of disease prevention it gives people a false sense of security. It doesn't make sense, people think circumcision is a form of protection so now they can run around and be whores because only uncut guys get infections.:rolleyes:
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

Fastest way to change public opinion of circumcision? Cut Medicaid payment of it.
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

Fastest way to change public opinion of circumcision? Cut Medicaid payment of it.

This is what happened in other countries that used to circ. The insurance stopped covering it and the rates dropped like wildfire. Unfortunately, pressure for circumcision is so strong in this country (for certain reason but I won't get into that here.....) that many offices lower the price on them. Did you know that human foreskins are used in cosmetic products? They use circumcised foreskin fibroblasts.

http://www.plasmetic.com/skin/skin-...rom-skinmedica-promoted-by-oprah-winfrey.html


They are also sometimes used as new skin for burn victims. But this does not justify the practice, as there are other ways to get new skin for burn victims.


And still, many of them simply get thrown in the trash and the doctor/hospital takes the money for the circumcision and uses it for whatever. Of course not all or maybe MOST doctors are not like this, but you know some are.
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

It amazes me the extent to which pregnant couples go to in order to deliver a healthy baby, (ie... not one drop of alcohol or even 2nd hand cigarette smoke during pregnancy, multiple check ups, neo-natal vitamins, music for the fetus, etc...) yet will volunteer their newborn baby to be subjected to a needless procedure that can mutilate their sons sexual organs, create infections, and yes, even death. Granted these percentages are small, but given the lengths the couple went to during pregnancy is illogical in the extreme to then do.

This family lost their newborn baby boy to a circumcision gone awry. It happens. Don't kid yourself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YSBS9y9YvQ
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

I agree with what blackbeltninja said up-thread - I really hope that if this is done, there is no religious exemption.

Actually, I would actively campaign against this bill unless religious circumcisions were also banned.

I don't like to see any pseudo-"cultural" reasoning treated with kid gloves and unnecessary sensitivity while the rest of the people simply get ordered what to do and told to like it or fuck off elsewhere.

-d-
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

Actually, I would actively campaign against this bill unless religious circumcisions were also banned.

I don't like to see any pseudo-"cultural" reasoning treated with kid gloves and unnecessary sensitivity while the rest of the people simply get ordered what to do and told to like it or fuck off elsewhere.

-d-

Hear hear!
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

I've had a circumcision. I'm not scarred, my dick is a (very) healthy size, I don't hate my parents for choosing to have this procedure done, and I have yet to see such an extreme as Molten so conveniently pointed out. I've seen the result of a circumcision right in my own home - the aftermath is a little scary, but it lasts less than a day, and it's over, healed and back to normal use - but that's one experience and unlike Molten, I won't use one story to convince you to go out and snip your dicks, or not.

You anti-folks want it to be the boys' choice ONLY. Well, that's all well and good - you have children and raise them how you wish.

I will never rail against abortion - that's the mothers' choice. In the same vein, i'm not going to rail against circumcision - that's clearly a family choice. Useless? Well, I don't have an uncut dick, so I'm not at liberty to discuss the pros and cons of having one versus not having one. And I personally don't care to. Mine is in working order. Yours is too. And life goes on.
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

^Interesting; but I'm not sure how it's a "family" choice.

It's not like sitting down to chat about which city we should move to with Dad looking for a new job; it's the boy's winkie and the family really need no say in the matter whatsoever, unless the parents need to make a critical medical decision. For purely cosmetic reasons... no.

-d-
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

^Interesting; but I'm not sure how it's a "family" choice.

It's not like sitting down to chat about which city we should move to with Dad looking for a new job; it's the boy's winkie and the family really need no say in the matter whatsoever, unless the parents need to make a critical medical decision. For purely cosmetic reasons... no.

-d-

In my roundabout way, I'm really posing this question - how is it societies' choice? No, it's not a painless procedure, and like all surgery, it comes with risk - I can argue that it is very slight, but saying there is a 1% chance still means there is a chance. It depends on the parent, how they were brought up - hopefully they do research on the procedure rather than do it "cuz my kid wouldn't want a hood over his pee pee". My parents, while christian, probably didn't do this out of some religious construct(my father most certainly didn't; he despises organised religion almost as much as I do)... so I fail to see the problem with the anti people wanting the choice of the procedure stopped.

It's just an alternate way to think on it. I'm not getting why on this one thing, everyone is ready and eager to jump into a nanny state agenda.
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

And physical harm? It's temporary pain... and a procedure that has benefits to it, both physical and social (pertaining to cultural). A pain that has no lasting physical or psychological effect as far as I know.

So your cool with me punching you in your face? (not that I have any desire to what so ever) The pains only temporary and it can have the benefit of making you look totally bad ass! You can tell people about how you swooped in to save an old ladies bag or saving a young maiden from a dragon. They'd think you were totally cool ;). Plus you can play the wounded puppy card and get lots of sympathy from people.

It depends on the parent, how they were brought up - hopefully they do research on the procedure rather than do it "cuz my kid wouldn't want a hood over his pee pee".

But which ones more likely?
 
Re: Circumcision in San Francisco

I'm trying to picture all the people who have struggled to ensure safe access to birth control and abortion over the years...trying to picture them shouting "It's a woman's right to abort her son's foreskin after he's born!!!"

And you know, I just don't buy it.
 
Back
Top