barnbuddy
Sex God
Re: Why is circumcision a mutilation?
I'm cut, and I can't imagine being angry about it
I'm cut, and I can't imagine being angry about it
To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
In CA or specifically SF, baby circumcision is banned as it is considered a mutilation.
In moslem countries boys get circumcised at 8 yrs old with no anaesthetic, ouch.
I am glad I got cut, looks better than sausage
you would be glad too if your eye lid was circumcised as long as all other people around you got their eye lids removed.![]()
There is a phobia thread around the forums if you wanted to add to...
Oh, and the foreskin has a purpose too. At least two in fact. Although in fairness they can be considered benefits rather than necessities obviously, otherwise people wouldnt get circ'd at all.
First, the foreskin aids stimulation of the glans each time it rolls over the rim.
Second, for women, the foreskin covers the rim on outward thrusts, so a womens natural lubrication doesn't get pulled out of the vagina which can lead to vaginal sores from frequent or prolonged sex.
Nice link. Now, with cut and uncut being arguably better or worse, we can all agree that it doesn't matter either way at least.
Now, its just about a persons individual choice to have it done.
You must have had some bad experiences to make such a harsh statement.

THAT BEING SAID, I have seen quite a few uncircumcised dicks that were just nasty looking. Like the foreskin is too small and it's strangling the head so it's bright red in a not-very-healthy-looking way.
Um...I'm not quite sure I understand your question, but I'll give it a shot.
If you're asking about my husband's previous sexual history, I don't think that has anything to do with it. He had WAY more sexual partners than I did over the years, plus he started at a much younger age.
This is a fact. I immediately noticed the difference when I first got together with my husband. Not that my own glans isn't sensitive and all, but his is definitely smoother and more sensitive than mine. The sensitivity issue is unquestionably a valid argument.
Ryan didn't receive abuse because of his decision to get circumcised. He received abuse because he became a fanatical pro-circumcision advocate to the point where almost all of his posts were about the benefits of circumcision, and he spent quite a bit of time trying to convince JUBbers to get circumcised for no reason at all. He was incredibly inflexible and close-minded, and I personally found him incredibly irritating. I never gave him any abuse, but I was not at all sad to see him leave. If he hadn't been so good-looking, he wouldn't have had nearly as many supporters as he did.When did this occur? It is unfortunate that he was treated in such a way.
Because he's much more diplomatic than I am.Interesting. I wonder why kallipolis didn't mention this in his post about him.
