The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Oh No! It's Another Thread About Circumcision.

Age and foreskin status ...

  • Under 30 and cut

    Votes: 24 16.9%
  • Under 30 and uncut

    Votes: 21 14.8%
  • 30-50 and cut

    Votes: 36 25.4%
  • 30-50 and uncut

    Votes: 16 11.3%
  • Over 50 and cut

    Votes: 31 21.8%
  • Over 50 and uncut

    Votes: 14 9.9%
  • I can't tell whether I'm cut or uncut

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    142
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

You are arbitrarily insisting the intent behind this one ritual must be a sexual desire for children. With no more evidence to support that claim than I could say my doctor went into his field so he could cup my balls and touch my penis.

Actually, I have no more evidence than a doctor who gives a boy a prostate exam for no medical reason. Your analogy would only be true if I accused him of becoming a Rabbi because he's a pedophile which I did not say.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Actually, I have no more evidence than a doctor who gives a boy a prostate exam for no medical reason. Your analogy would only be true if I accused him of becoming a Rabbi because he's a pedophile which I did not say.

Bankside already addressed this and I agree with him.

That there is no reasonable motive for our times does not turn something into pedophilia.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

That there is no reasonable motive for our times does not turn something into pedophilia.

So you and buzz support doctors abusing children then?
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

So you and buzz support doctors abusing children then?

It is your assertion that this is abuse. You are arguing in a circle. The outrage that this is inappropriate abuse and viewable as such within its context would be much more convincing coming from a member of this community rather than someone judging it from the outside.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

It is your assertion that this is abuse. You are arguing in a circle.

You are seriously arguing that doctors have the right to grab and probe whatever they want on your body?
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

You are seriously arguing that doctors have the right to grab and probe whatever they want on your body?

Why would I countenance defending something I never said?

You creating a strawman and pushing it into my mouth doesn't mean that I said it.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Why would I countenance defending something I never said?

You creating a strawman and pushing it into my mouth doesn't mean that I said it.

If you don't support it then you shouldn't have a accused me of circular reasoning. That I was making an analogy should have been obvious.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

If you don't support it then you shouldn't have a accused me of circular reasoning. That I was making an analogy should have been obvious.

"It's abuse because it's not medically necessary" is not a logical conclusion anymore than "there's no modern day medical need to avoid shellfish or pork so Jewish parents are intentionally fostering malnourishment in their children."
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

"It's abuse because it's not medically necessary" is not a logical conclusion anymore than "there's no modern day medical need to avoid shellfish or pork so Jewish parents are intentionally fostering malnourishment in their children."

REALLY????😨😨😨 Because the law completes disagrees with you. Doctors can and do go to prison all the time for that, but you're arguing that a Rabbi should be allowed to hold the completely outdated belief that it's hygienic without being labeled a pedophile. Why?
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

REALLY????������ Because the law completes disagrees with you. Doctors can and do go to prison all the time for that, but you're arguing that a Rabbi should be allowed to hold the completely outdated belief that it's hygienic without being labeled a pedophile. Why?

You can get a circumcision in a secular hospital from a secular doctor and almost assuredly, he is going to be touching the child's genitals.

So why don't you take all this outrage and go form a lawsuit against every doctor providing neonatal care in the country, since you're so convinced you are right. Let's see if the law agrees with you.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

You can get a circumcision in a secular hospital from a secular doctor and almost assuredly, he is going to be touching the child's genitals.

So why don't you take all this outrage and go form a lawsuit against every doctor providing neonatal care in the country, since you're so convinced you are right. Let's see if the law agrees with you.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Sorry, but that was just too funny. A doctor doesn't touch anything more than necessary for the procedure. Straw man argument right here folks.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

��������������������������

Sorry, but that was just too funny. A doctor doesn't touch anything more than necessary for the procedure. Straw man argument right here folks.

The procedure itself is unnecessary in the overwhelming majority of cases. But it is not seen as abusive and sexually motivated even with utter lack of medical need.

Have a new argument?
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

The procedure itself is unnecessary in the overwhelming majority of cases. But it is not seen as abusive and sexually motivated even with utter lack of medical need.

Have a new argument?

Actually this is false. My mother, a nurse btw, decided to get me circumcised for the belief that my penis would be easier for me to clean as I got older resulting in a lower chance of infection. She's also not alone in the idea. You're free to disagree with the belief if you want, but saying that there's no medical logic behind it is just false.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Actually this is false. My mother, a nurse btw, decided to get me circumcised for the belief that my penis would be easier for me to clean as I got older resulting in a lower chance of infection. She's also not alone in the idea. You're free to disagree with the belief if you want, but saying that there's no medical logic behind it is just false.

The medical establishment in general recognizes no substantive medical benefit assuming reasonable body cleaning on a reasonable timetable. It is not seen as medically necessary at all other than to deal with specific (and highly rare) disorders.

Sorry your aunt isn't the Medical Tzar.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

This entire thread stopped making sence a long time ago. Now it's just a pissing contest.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

The medical establishment in general recognizes no substantive medical benefit assuming reasonable body cleaning on a reasonable timetable. It is not seen as medically necessary at all other than to deal with specific (and highly rare) disorders.

Sorry your aunt isn't the Medical Tzar.

Lol. In general? That's funny. You make it sound like doctors are actually allowed to have minority opinions! Where would science be if professionals were allowed to have different opinions!
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Lol. In general? That's funny. You make it sound like doctors are actually allowed to have minority opinions! Where would science be if professionals were allowed to have different opinions!

No major medical organization recommends either universal circumcision for all infant males (aside from the recommendations of the World Health Organization for parts of Africa), or banning the procedure.[7] Ethical and legal questions regarding informed consent and autonomy have been raised over non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

No major medical organization recommends either universal circumcision for all infant males (aside from the recommendations of the World Health Organization for parts of Africa), or banning the procedure.[7] Ethical and legal questions regarding informed consent and autonomy have been raised over non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision

And your point is........???

Oh wait. You have none and now your just grasping at straws.
 
Back
Top