The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Oh No! It's Another Thread About Circumcision.

Age and foreskin status ...

  • Under 30 and cut

    Votes: 24 16.9%
  • Under 30 and uncut

    Votes: 21 14.8%
  • 30-50 and cut

    Votes: 36 25.4%
  • 30-50 and uncut

    Votes: 16 11.3%
  • Over 50 and cut

    Votes: 31 21.8%
  • Over 50 and uncut

    Votes: 14 9.9%
  • I can't tell whether I'm cut or uncut

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    142
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

I think this thread has run its course. A discussion of underage penises was a questionable topic for debate on a gay porn forum to begin with, however non-sexual the issue is.

I don't see how it is questionable unless it has to do with something sexual, which it doesn't.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

0722111.jpg


Rabbi Schmuel Kamenetsky says it's permissible to do the sucking with a tube rather than the mouth


http://finkorswim.com/2012/04/03/metzitza-bpeh-version-∞-a-house-divided/

He's a freak. This whole idea is one the freakiest around.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

He's a freak. This whole idea is one the freakiest around.


If I recall correctly, New York State makes exceptions (special treatment) in its incest laws so certain Jews can carry on the tradition/practice of inbreeding.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Hold on, since you have been "shot-down" on your posts, baiting. Your response is to now claim that "inbreeding" is also a factor.
Incest, is when a father, son, or brother has sexual relations with a daughter, or sister.
If a man has sexual relations with a son, or a brother has sexual relations with a brother, this is not classed as "incest"

Here Scottish Law, makes that very clear, as do some other Countries. The Bel-Ami twins, and the Visconti triplets proves this point very well.
Your use of the word "inbreeding" explains one of the reasons why. as there is no possibility, of one overage brother making another overage brother, pregnant, and all the dangers and abnormalities that can occur, when close "blood" relatives have sex with the opposite gender.
Am i defending this? No i am not. Just trying to clear that rather "blinkered" outrage from you.

Inbreeding and incest, are NOT the same sexual practice.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

If I recall correctly, New York State makes exceptions (special treatment) in its incest laws so certain Jews can carry on the tradition/practice of inbreeding.

Do you have a link for that?
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Stupid tradition
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

There was no course. There was no "discussion" of infant genitalia per se, only specious accusations of a comical absurdity.

To suggest that the thread is somehow pandering to lurking pedophile interest is nothing short of paranoid hysteria.

As for the thread, all the purpose seems to be is a pretext for anti-Semitic remarks under the timeless umbrella of the circumcision "debate" in Hot Topics. Unfortunately, anti-Semitism is no more disallowed on JUB than anti-Islamicism or anti-Christianism.

Real men don't suck a little boy's penis - pedophiles do. And now you want to play the anti-semitic race card.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Real men don't suck a little boy's penis - pedophiles do. And now you want to play the anti-semitic race card.

and it's no great secret which cards you're playing, Jack...

1813-2-the-idiot-card-game.jpg



I have a strong suspicion that your deck is full of them :)
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

and it's no great secret which cards you're playing, Jack...

1813-2-the-idiot-card-game.jpg



I have a strong suspicion that your deck is full of them :)

So you like to suck little boy's dicks too?
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

196157.gif
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

BAHAHAHA Holy shit, that's enough JUB for today.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

From two years in CE&P I can tell you guys that the next stage is "you liberals always resort to personal attacks when you can't defend your position"...
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

No, the OP may or may not have, but the complaint was about religion, not humanitarianism. And your oblique claims of pedophilia, well . . .



. . . let's just say I'm not the only one here to call a spade a spade.

No, you're one of many in JUB when they can't defend their position resort to personal attacks and ignore the focus of the thread.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Jack, as much as I agree this is a bizarre religious ritual, calling it pedophilia is even more bizarre. The practice is done in front of the parents, family and friends. Do you really think they would condone such a thing? And since the practice has gone on for generations, would that mean each generation would have to find pedophilic mohels to do the deed? It would also mean all orthodox Jews condone pedophilia.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

No, you're one of many in JUB when they can't defend their position resort to personal attacks and ignore the focus of the thread.

So you like to suck little boy's dicks too?

Really man? Do you not pay attention to what you say and do yourself? You've continually ignored points made in the thread and asked someone if they were a Pedophile. Don't act all high and mighty, you are far from it.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Really man? Do you not pay attention to what you say and do yourself? You've continually ignored points made in the thread and asked someone if they were a Pedophile. Don't act all high and mighty, you are far from it.

He can't help himself...he is a right wing conservative republican Christian whose primary purpose here is to spread faux news talking points.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

He can't help himself...he is a right wing conservative republican Christian whose primary purpose here is to spread faux news talking points.

All that changes is replace pedophile with unAmerican, anti-American, communist, socialist, etc. Other than that the form is exactly the same, yup.
 
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite

Jack, as much as I agree this is a bizarre religious ritual, calling it pedophilia is even more bizarre. The practice is done in front of the parents, family and friends. Do you really think they would condone such a thing? And since the practice has gone on for generations, would that mean each generation would have to find pedophilic mohels to do the deed? It would also mean all orthodox Jews condone pedophilia.

This 'audience' business, to expose a child's genitals for onlookers and make it the centerpiece of a party, is sick right from the start - even without the cutting and sucking.

But, I'll bet if Catholics were told they'd be excommunicated if they didn't watch priests molest their children, they do it. Probably a good many of them would get off on it. How many Catholics defend child-molesting priests, or at least want outsiders to mind their own business, do you suppose?

Muslims, to this day, stone their wives and daughters to death in front of a seemingly content audience. It is quite usual/normal for them to expect audience participation, isn't it?

-------------------------

Anyway, the word 'pedophile' has more that a couple well published/used legal definitions.

For example: "Some forensic science texts, such as Holmes (2008) use the term to refer to a class of psychological offender typologies that target child victims, even when such children are not the primary sexual interest of the offender."

As usual, it is imposable to get everyone to agree to use only one definition. Here, for this topic, the targeting of defenseless male infants, the exposing their genitals, etc. is near enough to pedophile activity for Jack's comments/accusations to not bother me in the least. If this activity is not pedophilia, it is right on the brink of it - too close for comfort.
 
Back
Top