But metaphysics is unscientific, and for a metaphysical product that is marketed as one that "anyone" can do, it shouldn't have to adhere to statistical sample sizes and trials. You're testing to see if it works, and if the null hypothesis is that "anyone" can do it, then two who can't is conclusive enough. Theoretically, Ouija Board isn't a product or pharmaceutical that has limited effectiveness based on one's physical body or the conditions of one's illness.
If Ho: p = 1; Ha: p < 1, then Penn and Teller's "study" has already taken steps to reject Ho. I imagine it only takes at most 2 people in a pool of 25 to make <100% a significant relationship.
If Ho: p = 1; Ha: p < 1, then Penn and Teller's "study" has already taken steps to reject Ho. I imagine it only takes at most 2 people in a pool of 25 to make <100% a significant relationship.


Ludlow, I like your style man -- that was extremely well written.
