The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Political Cartoons, Memes & Amusing Videos

7-beckom-counterpoint.jpg

6-rogers-tinyview.jpg
 
Wins the internet today. Hands down.
 
Texas is melting. Spare a thought for all the people caught up in the Troglodyte nastiness on the border.
 
^ I'm guessing that a power outage would be just as deadly as the 'big chill'? I expect AC would be a must-have.
 
^ I'm guessing that a power outage would be just as deadly as the 'big chill'? I expect AC would be a must-have.

I've lived in California, and I know what a rolling brownout looks like, and we had one last week. Nobody in our gubmint ever used that word. Because of the graft, we can't buy power from other states, and we aren't on the national grid, they never fixed anything, and it's just going to get worse the longer the temperature remains extremely high.

This is what deregulation in the name of greed looks like.
 
I'd love to celebrate but that's not the totality of what that decision entails. They did NOT render a decision on gerrymandering, they did NOT say NC gerrymandering was unconstitutional, they said the SC is the only body that gets to decide which state court decisions "go too far." It's better than nothing, but let's face it, it's at most a requirement to be less obvious.

In retrospect, it would have been very odd for any court the rule that the courts have no jurisdiction over the law. It's a stupid proposition on its face and why it was so bonkers to begin with. Had the SC agreed, they would have set a precedent that limited their own power.

None of this bars gerrymandering or any of the other election abuses in which the right routinely engages. If a trog legislature makes biased laws, and a trog state court declines to object, nothing happens. Let's see if the NC gerrymandered map for 2024 actually changes at all.
 
^^there's no way that Tex Schram would have let THAT anywhere near a cheerleader's uniform. Jerry, on the other hand :rotflmao:
 
Back
Top