The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

POLL IT:- Straight-acting

How do you feel about the term straight-acting?

  • I don't like it, but i don't resent it's usage

    Votes: 14 15.7%
  • I don't like it, and i disapprove of those who use it

    Votes: 24 27.0%
  • I don't object to it, but i don't identify with it

    Votes: 23 25.8%
  • I identify as straight-acting

    Votes: 27 30.3%
  • I don't fully understand the term

    Votes: 1 1.1%

  • Total voters
    89
  • Poll closed .
Right, so you are not yourself so much in the work environment. I am. Nothing stops me from commenting on fit guys if i see them. My workmates find it funny. Its not me putting on any front at all, i'm no different wherever i am. There is however one exception. I watch what i say around my family, because i don't have a frank relationship with any of them, except my sister who is gay also.

I think that most people have a place where they retrain themselves a bit, few st8 guys turn to their mum and say "look at the rack on that chick"
I know that some if not most folks don't want to hear about my sexual thoughts and what guy I want to suck, I might add that I don't care to hear about what chick that they want to fuck.
Out of mutual respect sex should (in my opinion) be kept out of the work place, I try not to share.
 
is a wonda ^ out of workplace ^
SSSSSSH"
ooh

anyway

lucky planet go a round ans no play it straight

ha
 
Do we want a repetition of the other thread here? Because so far I am restraining myself on purpose and not engaging in the conversation. I mean, we already had it there, to zero effect. Let's just leave it at a poll eh?
 
I think one of conversationalist desired to get anecdotal proof of his point but because of all the oppressed emotion and 'I'm a better fag than you' holier than thou bullsit in the other thread everyone avoided saying they are masculine. Perhaps JUB is feminine but online and in real life the majority of gay men are masculine and average everyday folks not Bunsen burners of rainbow pride.
 
I always thought using masculine made more sense. I personally don't like the term, but if someone wants to label themselves "straight-acting", all the right to them.
 
Of course the poll does identify that the vast majority could give two flying fucks about the term.

flying-fuck.jpg

flying-fuck.jpg
 
Why is the assumption that the people who don't like the term are feminine?

I wonder that myself.

And I asked in the other thread what brings up the NEED to measure your masculinity to begin with? I am definitely more masculine than not, but it never even occurs to me to think about it or describe myself in this way to anyone. If someone asked me if I was masculine, I'd make fun of them. Case in point from two nights ago:

1234110_10151845242609407_189660971_n.jpg




But still, if you're gonna care about your manly image, use "masculine", don't tell people that being a stereotypical gay makes you a sissy. Because the truth is, 80% of all gay guys that I know are neither the gay cliche, nor some butch manly men. Most of us are in-between - not making a statement but enjoying the freedom of expression being gay - and free from heteronormative rules of behavior - allows us. The reason why "straight acting" is a dumb term is that it perpetuates the notion that MOST gays are some crazy rainbow caricature. Which we are not.
 
I wonder that myself.

And I asked in the other thread what brings up the NEED to measure your masculinity to begin with? I am definitely more masculine than not, but it never even occurs to me to think about it or describe myself in this way to anyone.

I don't either and I don't even know whether or not I'd be considered more masculine or more fem, but I don't go around identifying myself as either. I've had people who suspected I was gay and people who didn't have a clue. If people want to make their mind up about me by just knowing my sexuality, that is on them if they're so lazy.
 
28.79% is not a "vast" majority.

Sorry this just annoys me....get it right 51.51% don't care. You have to add the people that use it because hey they are using it so they don't care. That is a majority. Also based on your other post you only showed the results on your one sided view. If you want to get a better analysis for the results you have to review and compare all the data not just the side you want.

Also if you want we could even say currently, 71.22% of people don't have even have any type of resentment toward someone that uses the term, that is a majority. You only look at the data as you want you don't look at what it is fully saying. Currently more than half don't have any an issue with the term.
 
On a dating site, it is especially useful for one. It cuts straight to the point. Masculine is not satisfactory enough a word to use, as this fails to adequately distinguish between behavioural and physical traits. I.E. bears and scallies are both masculine physically, but not necessarily in their mannerisms.
I don't use dating sites i might add, i'm guessing.

And yet most guys manage without it, to great success. I DO use dating sites, so I am not guessing. Like I said, in Chicago pretty much nobody uses that term, and people still get laid and find dates. Which is neither here nor there of course.

This may be true. Its worth noting however, based on a post in the other thread, that you say you wear a rainbow bracelet so that people can tell you are gay. So, it does occur to you to actively identify yourself as gay. For me, i don't feel the need for that. I could be wrong, but i get the feeling that your gay identity is far more important to you, than mine is to me. If that is the case, it can't hardly surprise me that we take very different attitudes towards perceived homophobia ('that's so gay' being one other example we have opposed views on).

Oh, absolutely I care about people knowing I'm gay. I want to know where I stand with everyone from the get go. I have no time for 'phobes and I want to know who they are before I waste life on them. Of course, I am in a field where nobody cares if you are gay - classical music - so it is also not a huge risk for me. Though I can't help but wonder why people deliberately put themselves in work fields that are ultra conservative and homophobic... Like, isn't your personal happiness and the ability to live free of fear and hiding more important than any one particular job?

As for "that's so gay", I didn't remember we had opposite views. That makes me sad, I'd think that one at least is beyond argument...

This annoys me greatly that you insist that straight-acting is colouring everybody else as being stereotypical. That is not what the statement is conveying. The statement is essentially making note that SA guys are not femme, and that this label is useful when describing ourselves to others in relevant situations. Please don't be under the misguided perception that SA guys make a point of how they identify. Its gay first, SA later (if relevant).
Your position as being concerned that it makes the majority of gays look like the crazy rainbow caricature you mentioned, has me wondering WHY should you be concerned? There's nothing wrong with that gay type, they are just at the opposite end of the spectrum to SA guys.
And, i might also add, that you do not seem to care that the stereotype of the colourful character is reinforced in any measure by the femme half of the community, so why is it one rule for femmes, and loathing for SA's???

The double standard is such only on the surface, and it goes into a tangent of what "persecution" is and what "discrimination" is, that was touched on a little in the last page of the other topic. People tend to dub ANY negative attitude as discrimination. And technically it is, but the question is - how harmful and deep it goes. Femme guys are persecuted EVERYWHERE. They are persecuted by straight people for their obvious "gayness", and they are persecuted in the gay community, because despite stereotypes you "SA" guys have, MOST gay men are not that feminine, and a LOT of them do not like femmy guys. If you go on Grindr, you won't find a whole lot of "straight acting" where I am, but you will find a LOT of "no fems". Which is sad, and it sucks, but it's a different discussion. My point however is this - "straight acting" guys DO NOT face the type of overwhelming discrimination that fem guys do. Sure, you get hated on by some of us who see more into the term than you do, but you don't get any fire from straight people (not more than the usual homophobia if they learn you are gay), and you have a whole big field of dudes who either identify like you or don't care enough to be bothered and hey - you're masculine, so you're right up their alley.

That would be why fem guys get what you perceive as a "free pass" on promoting their behavior, and you don't. Because for many of us your attitude is part of the problem that THEY are having, even though you don't mean it to be and you don't do it on purpose.

I know you disagree, and I'm ok with that. Also, I appreciate your tone here.
 
Sorry this just annoys me....get it right 51.51% don't care. You have to add the people that use it because hey they are using it so they don't care. That is a majority. Also based on your other post you only showed the results on your one sided view. If you want to get a better analysis for the results you have to review and compare all the data not just the side you want.

Also if you want we could even say currently, 71.22% of people don't have even have any type of resentment toward someone that uses the term, that is a majority. You only look at the data as you want you don't look at what it is fully saying. Currently more than half don't have any an issue with the term.

Um, I wasn't offering an unbiased analysis, I was pointing out stats that mattered to me. Also no, you can't say "51.51% don't care" because the ones who identify with it DO care about it. Their attitude is NOT the same as the people who don't use it and don't give a fuck.

As for the lack of resentment - you are correct. Most people tend to be apolitical and not to care too much about social justice. A fact of life, I'm not judging them.
 
"straight acting" guys DO NOT face the type of overwhelming discrimination that fem guys do.

I believe that this is true.

But I also believe it's a leap-- if not a stereotype itself-- to assert that anyone using it for themselves is trying to participate in that discrimination, or causing it. Even if they stand right here telling you that they do not believe femme gay guys are bad. And I believe both threads have shown a very big differential between the people defending the term are somehow attacking effeminate gay men vs. people who dislike the term completely attacking the character and value of someone who uses it.

The other thread practically reads like a list of testimonials about how much people believe that anyone who uses it is homophobic, self-hating and "not worth my time." So if we're going to talk about the implication of operating off prejudices and prejudgments, then let's be honest about it.
 
On a dating site, it is especially useful for one. It cuts straight to the point. Masculine is not satisfactory enough a word to use, as this fails to adequately distinguish between behavioural and physical traits. I.E. bears and scallies are both masculine physically, but not necessarily in their mannerisms.
I don't use dating sites i might add, i'm guessing.



This may be true. Its worth noting however, based on a post in the other thread, that you say you wear a rainbow bracelet so that people can tell you are gay. So, it does occur to you to actively identify yourself as gay. For me, i don't feel the need for that. I could be wrong, but i get the feeling that your gay identity is far more important to you, than mine is to me. If that is the case, it can't hardly surprise me that we take very different attitudes towards perceived homophobia ('that's so gay' being one other example we have opposed views on).



This annoys me greatly that you insist that straight-acting is colouring everybody else as being stereotypical. That is not what the statement is conveying. The statement is essentially making note that SA guys are not femme, and that this label is useful when describing ourselves to others in relevant situations. Please don't be under the misguided perception that SA guys make a point of how they identify. Its gay first, SA later (if relevant).
Your position as being concerned that it makes the majority of gays look like the crazy rainbow caricature you mentioned, has me wondering WHY should you be concerned? There's nothing wrong with that gay type, they are just at the opposite end of the spectrum to SA guys.
And, i might also add, that you do not seem to care that the stereotype of the colourful character is reinforced in any measure by the femme half of the community, so why is it one rule for femmes, and loathing for SA's???

Just still not getting your point. If being gay isn't such a big part of your identity, I assume its not because you're ashamed of being gay, but just because sexuality isn't such a big part of your identity: who you want to go to bed with isn't really who you are as a person. Nothing sounds wrong with that. But if that's the world we live in, it kind of rules out using "straight-acting" as a meaningful term. A straight guy wanting to go to bed with a woman isn't really who he is as a person either. So saying you're straight acting doesn't say much about anyone's personality, for the same reason that being gay or not has little to do with your identity either.
 
Um, I wasn't offering an unbiased analysis, I was pointing out stats that mattered to me. Also no, you can't say "51.51% don't care" because the ones who identify with it DO care about it. Their attitude is NOT the same as the people who don't use it and don't give a fuck.

As for the lack of resentment - you are correct. Most people tend to be apolitical and not to care too much about social justice. A fact of life, I'm not judging them.

WRONG, you very much so can and should take that into account because they are using the term and the whole reason this came up was because it was said a majority of people don't give a flying fuck if its used. So you take the 28.79% and the 22.73% for the people that use it because they are not going to use it if they give a flying fuck. You can say what you want but you are wrong.


EDIT: The "don't care" was related to the aspect of not liking it, you are adding things to the poll that do not belong the analysis of the poll is based on what is there. Its a poll you take the data that is there to analyze not what you want to add outside of the poll.
 
I believe that this is true.

But I also believe it's a leap-- if not a stereotype itself-- to assert that anyone using it for themselves is trying to participate in that discrimination, or causing it. Even if they stand right here telling you that they do not believe femme gay guys are bad. And I believe both threads have shown a very big differential between the people defending the term are somehow attacking effeminate gay men vs. people who dislike the term completely attacking the character and value of someone who uses it.

The other thread practically reads like a list of testimonials about how much people believe that anyone who uses it is homophobic, self-hating and "not worth my time." So if we're going to talk about the implication of operating off prejudices and prejudgments, then let's be honest about it.

Nobody ever said that SA guys do it to deliberately perpetuate a stereotype or to harm others. Not in all 12 pages there or the 2 here. It's extremely unfair to claim that, and if you insist on it, I'll hold you to quoting people. I could be wrong, but if I am, then whoever said it was deeply wrong.

And yeah, I think people who feel the need to identify as straight acting, have issues with their sexuality. Might be minor issues, and totally subconscious, but they are there. Because in this day and age, pretty much ALL of us already have some issue with our sexuality, other than young teens coming out NOW.

See, I'm honest about it.
 
WRONG, you very much so can and should take that into account because they are using the term and the whole reason this came up was because it was said a majority of people don't give a flying fuck if its used. So you take the 28.79% and the 22.73% for the people that use it because they are not going to use it if they give a flying fuck. You can say what you want but you are wrong.

Don't stomp your foot too much, it makes you seem gay.

And uh, if they don't give a flying fuck, why don't they change it when they see it bothers others? Yes, exactly, because they DO give a flying fuck.
 
28.79% is not a "vast" majority.

OH CONTRARY MON FRITTER...

I don't like it, but i don't resent it's usage 20.90% Just stated quite clearly they could give two fucks
I don't like it, and i disapprove of those who use it 28.36%
I don't object to it, but i don't identify with it 28.36% Equally just stated they could give two fucks
I identify as straight-acting 22.39% Could obviously give two fucks because they use the term.
I don't fully understand the term 00%


That 81. something or another... you do the math.... of people who could give two fucks about the whining 'people use a term that makes me feel funny inside'.

I say live and let live, getting angry or posting silly shit to other folks is just reinforcing douche-baggery and indicating that it bothers you. So yeah feel feee but whatever. If someone can make a life decision about someone else off two text messages then they are pretty damn talented or fairly close minded.

P.S. I have never asked the question nor stated it as a descriptor... I am masculine personified.

(ends with fart)
 
Back
Top