The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

president Obama and transgender bathroom controversy

Very importantly: The University of North Carolina is defying the Governor of North Carolina.



This is perfect demonstration that if there was any government over-reach...it was the State government of North Carolina.

Without consultation or respect for institutions like the university, the legislature moved to curtail rights that transgender people already had.

Yeah, the nutjobs may be whining about bathrooms, but this bill was actually aimed at institutionalizing LGBT discrimination across the board. They were trying to make illegal any attempt to protect LGBT people. The trans this was just the wedge.
 
Yeah, the nutjobs may be whining about bathrooms, but this bill was actually aimed at institutionalizing LGBT discrimination across the board. They were trying to make illegal any attempt to protect LGBT people. The trans this was just the wedge.

Most of the knuckle dragging mouth breathers that are so incensed about the toilets don't even know what the true intent of the legislation was.

It has been an almost perfect Trojan Horse bill. Keep everyone distracted by the false argument of caring about where people defecate...while making sure they are ignoring the real assault on civil rights entrenched in the rest of the bill.
 
Most of the knuckle dragging mouth breathers that are so incensed about the toilets don't even know what the true intent of the legislation was.

It has been an almost perfect Trojan Horse bill. Keep everyone distracted by the false argument of caring about where people defecate...while making sure they are ignoring the real assault on civil rights entrenched in the rest of the bill.


^^^THIS^^^...and it is working....
 
There is no discrimination involved in expecting biological mem to use the men's room, and women the women's..
 
And this is where you fail.

You don't understand the neurochemical and hormonal structure that can define male and female and how these may not match the external sex organs.

So you are arguing this side of the issue from a point of complete and utter wilful ignorance of the complexities of gender identification....only seeing it as some kind of purely emotional or behavioural aberration.

For fuck's sakes.

Don't you ever even make an attempt to read up on a subject and develop a more complex understanding.

I'll bet that you also don't believe in evolutionary biology or that the earth is billions of years old either.

Fuck.
 
I don't know what you mean. Democracy is the only alternative to tyranny.

Democracy in it's purist form is mob rule, the majority decides what will happen and the minority has to go along with it.
In the 5TH grade my social studies teacher explained why The United States of America IS NOT a democracy, but is a Republic that protects individual freedom and liberty.

This should be an easy concept to understand, I really don't care where people piss.
Men bring their daughters into the men's room. Mothers bring their boys into the ladies room.
Last year at the Detroit zoo, I saw boys who had to have been at least 12 in line with mommy to go pee. I thought that it was weird, but guess what? I told myself to MYOP. (mind your own piss.)
 
Democracy in it's purist form is mob rule, the majority decides what will happen and the minority has to go along with it.
In the 5TH grade my social studies teacher explained why The United States of America IS NOT a democracy, but is a Republic that protects individual freedom and liberty.

This should be an easy concept to understand, I really don't care where people piss.
Men bring their daughters into the men's room. Mothers bring their boys into the ladies room.
Last year at the Detroit zoo, I saw boys who had to have been at least 12 in line with mommy to go pee. I thought that it was weird, but guess what? I told myself to MYOP. (mind your own piss.)

The US is a representative democracy. Of course we protect valid individual right, but it does not follow that the minorities are entitled to decide what will happen and the majoruty havs to go olong with it.
 
The US is a representative democracy. Of course we protect valid individual right, but it does not follow that the minorities are entitled to decide what will happen and the majoruty havs to go olong with it.

Do a little reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic
A republic (from Latin: res publica) is a sovereign state or country[1] which is organised with a form of government in which power resides in elected individuals representing the citizen body[2][3] and government leaders exercise power according to the rule of law. In modern times, the definition of a republic is commonly limited to a government which excludes a monarch.[3][4] Currently, 147 of the world's 206 sovereign states use the word "republic" as part of their official names; not all of these are republics in the sense of having elected governments, nor do all nations with elected governments use the word "republic" in their names.

The USA is a constitutionally based Republic with a representative form of government as opposed to a direct vote by the citizens which distinguishes it from a democracy.
 
The US is a representative democracy. Of course we protect valid individual right, but it does not follow that the minorities are entitled to decide what will happen and the majoruty havs to go olong with it.

attachment.php
 
The US is a representative democracy. Of course we protect valid individual right, but it does not follow that the minorities are entitled to decide what will happen and the majoruty havs to go olong with it.

Elected representative in a single part of government aren't able to gazump the others by introducing unconstitutional laws or those that breach the country's various agreements and treaties.
Interestingly, a substantial part of the majority believes that in this case, the minority should be entitled to equal rights.

Outright majorities are supporting this within affected universities, but somehow only majority views within your preferred scope should count.
 
The US is a representative democracy. Of course we protect valid individual right, but it does not follow that the minorities are entitled to decide what will happen and the majoruty havs to go olong with it.

You seem to be arguing in favor of a “collective right” – a fundamental right held not just by one person but by all in common. Is that a reasonable assumption?
 
Democracy is a way of government and is the only political system that includes a capacity for self-correction.
 
You seem to be arguing in favor of a “collective right” – a fundamental right held not just by one person but by all in common. Is that a reasonable assumption?
Yes. The people as a group have a right to make decisions about their country, and that necessarily means a majority of the people.
 
Democracy is a way of government and is the only political system that includes a capacity for self-correction.

I agree, and representative democracy is historically the most long lasting, stable and successful form of government. Alas, in the US, after the Civil War, the democrats were reduced to being a collection of minorities, and that continutes today. The result is US liberals/democrats have developed an ideology designed to get votes and keep the democrats/minorities in power: anti majority, anti white, anti Christian, anti free enterprise, anti Americana and pro immigrant, anti straight, and ultimately anti democracy, and pro authoritarian. You can clearly see it among the democrats in this forum; scornful of democracy, eager to have the liberal agenda forced on America by the president and/or Supreme Court.
 
sigh....

And so it goes.

I suppose that you also still think that you should be allowed to own slaves.
 
sigh....

And so it goes.

I suppose that you also still think that you should be allowed to own slaves.
The slave owners were democrats, and my family never were. 3 grt grandfathers and 6 grt grt uncles fought for the Union. After the war, the southern democrat bigots, the immigrants, mostly Irish and Jewish becomes the party of minorities and have been attacking the majority ever since.
 
Back
Top