The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

president Obama and transgender bathroom controversy

There's a distinct lack of empathy from the transphobic towards those whose lifestyles they oppose.
Just the same as with gays, the issue gets rolled in with perverts, rapists and pedos as straw man arguments - and the think of the women and children defence is used as justification against those implied threats.
It's a shortcut to ostracise people, and it's a handy justification for harm done towards them.

You can only hope these kinds of debates aren't increasing the personal risk to safety of trans people. But do the people making these arguments want to cause actual harm to the minorities they're connecting to unrelated criminal acts?
 
...You can only hope these kinds of debates aren't increasing the personal risk to safety of trans people. But do the people making these arguments want to cause actual harm to the minorities they're connecting to unrelated criminal acts?

Some don't care, some do.
 
You do realize that transwomen are not men. No one is fighting for the right to let men in women's spaces but to allow transwomen in these spaces as they are women.

Let's take another look at your transphobic ideas. If you basically forced people to use the same bathroom as the gender they were born into biologically then you would have transmen like this in the women's bathroom.
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/...ill-not-believe-are-trans181114-0/#gs.7_E2wfQ

I think that most ciswomen would rather have say Laverne Cox in the bathroom then Buck Angel.



Why should transwomen give a damn about how transphobic people feel? I mean should Blacks have given a damn at the fact that some racist white people didn't want to use the same bathroom as them? Again transwomen are women and deserve to use the female facilities. Again what is your alternative to make for instance transmen like Buck Angel use the same restrooms as the bio females. I guarantee you that most women would rather share for instance a transwoman like Diamond Stylz then someone like Buck Angel.
Also you do realize that the majority has no right to infringe on the rights of the minority right?

That is the logical falacy of begging the question: you assume trans people have a " right" to use the womens room, but the right or lack thereof is the very issue being discussed.
If trans people don't giva a damn what other people feel, why should anyone give a damn about trans people?
If trans women have the right to the women's room and shower how can you discriminate against other biological men wanting to lurk in the women's room? Or in the high school girls room? How can you tell? If they claim to think they are women they are in.
Are you goung to say that some discrimination is ok--only discrimination against minorities is bad?
There is no discrimination if equal facilities are provided for trans women and biological women. Trans people cannot insist on privacy while robbing others of theirs.
 
@Mariatenebre,

I highly suggest liquor or a hot shower and a scrub. Also maybe try not to get sucked into accidental innuendo'ing basing acceptability in a bathroom by how feminine/masculine someone looks, tends to be dangerous to the ambiguous. It also tends to help him (the talking head directly above me) along in his 'discourse', the weaselly bugger.
 
That is the logical falacy of begging the question: you assume trans people have a " right" to use the womens room, but the right or lack thereof is the very issue being discussed.
If trans people don't giva a damn what other people feel, why should anyone give a damn about trans people?
If trans women have the right to the women's room and shower how can you discriminate against other biological men wanting to lurk in the women's room? Or in the high school girls room? How can you tell? If they claim to think they are women they are in.
Are you goung to say that some discrimination is ok--only discrimination against minorities is bad?
There is no discrimination if equal facilities are provided for trans women and biological women. Trans people cannot insist on privacy while robbing others of theirs.

Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

Of course Ben's primary dishonesty is that there is no "right" to ban people from public accommodations because you hate them.

He's pushing apartheid using the same old tired excuses. One would hope for something fresh, but I guess bigots and haters by definition lack intelligence.
 
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

Of course Ben's primary dishonesty is that there is no "right" to ban people from public accommodations because you hate them.

He's pushing apartheid using the same old tired excuses. One would hope for something fresh, but I guess bigots and haters by definition lack intelligence.

They tend to rely on persistence, and when that fails, police batons.
 
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

Of course Ben's primary dishonesty is that there is no "right" to ban people from public accommodations because you hate them.

He's pushing apartheid using the same old tired excuses. One would hope for something fresh, but I guess bigots and haters by definition lack intelligence.

I can't even.

We're up to six pages with people continuing to dance around Benvolio's elliptical logic.

He has been proven wrong on so many statements he's made in this thread that I'm amazed that he has the balls to actually keep doubling down.

By his logic, no equal rights or protections would be granted to any minority if a state legislature passes legislation denying these protections. Once again, this bill wasn't about toilets. It was about a broad attempt to allow the state and businesses to discriminate against not only transgender people, but against the lgbt citizens in a number of areas.

He has no valid arguments or new arguments to offer. He will continue to hang on to his specious narrative and bigoted beliefs. Time for this thread to die a well deserved death.

 
Oh, Benvolio.

You have been proven wrong repeatedly in this thread.

Refusing to acknowledge when you've been caught out either lying outright or because of your ignorance of the issue at hand still doesn't change the fact that you have been proven wrong.

But the greatest shield that you and the others always throw up on issues from evolution through climate change and now the nature of transgenderism is that there is no scientific fact, only opinion.

I know we're not going to change your mind...and we are still going to find your arguments intellectually feeble, so there isn't much more to see here folks.
 
Oh, Benvolio.

You have been proven wrong repeatedly in this thread.

Refusing to acknowledge when you've been caught out either lying outright or because of your ignorance of the issue at hand still doesn't change the fact that you have been proven wrong.

But the greatest shield that you and the others always throw up on issues from evolution through climate change and now the nature of transgenderism is that there is no scientific fact, only opinion.

I know we're not going to change your mind...and we are still going to find your arguments intellectually feeble, so there isn't much more to see here folks.

Nonsense. Science has not and canot eliminate the expectation of privacy in the restrooms, dressing rooms and showers. Nor can our dictators whisk it away with the snap of his fingers. Ultimatley it will be a question for the US Supreme Court. The dems will vote for total power, the Republicans will vote for democracy. Today the court would be evenly spit. Depends on the new Justice. Or a Republican president can end the Federal intrusion.
 
It will take awhile for people to realize that the dictator has repealed the right of privacy in the bathroom.

You don't have it now.
Other women can watch you undress if you're a woman, other men can watch you undress if you're a man.
That's terrifying to homophobes.
 
You don't have it now.
Other women can watch you undress if you're a woman, other men can watch you undress if you're a man.
That's terrifying to homophobes.

So now you speak for homophobes?
 
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

Of course Ben's primary dishonesty is that there is no "right" to ban people from public accommodations because you hate them.

He's pushing apartheid using the same old tired excuses. One would hope for something fresh, but I guess bigots and haters by definition lack intelligence.

Yup. "They make me feel icky. This is America. I got rights. I don't gotta be around them if I don't want to."

He thinks this translates into a valid basis for denying people equal access and protection to public facilities.
 
It will take awhile for people to realize that the dictator has repealed the right of privacy in the bathroom.

And again with the same repeated lie.

Which once more makes me sure that this is about the black man in your white house.

There is no dictate. There is no federal law.

On behalf of institutions like University of North Carolina, the federal government has filed suit in order for the third branch of government to determine whether the law is a breach of civil rights.

In the meantime, the Federal government has made it clear that schools that do discriminate under the Republican piss place law may lose federal funding.

And as has already been pointed out, there is no perfect privacy in the bathroom...at least for men at urinals anyway. But last time I checked, we weren't all shitting like this....

public-toilets-at-the-latrine-at-ephesus-selcuk.jpg


...even in North Carolina, I know that there are these.

5a8csxgwe3fe5g7c.jpg


As for me, once I'm parked in a toilet stall....I really could care less who is taking a crap on either side of me. Or changing.

You really have nothing here.
 
A total waste of time to argue with Benvolio, he is a prime example though of the brick wall that makes up the right wing vocal base. Look how trump feeds on it by telling them any lie they need to hear to sell him his shit.
A call to ignorance and lack of empathy. That's what is important to remember they are many and though most may not have basic dsl connection in the hinterlands of America they know how to tune in AM hate radio. Expanding their views on anything they don't personally experience isn't going to happen.
 
And again with the same repeated lie.

Which once more makes me sure that this is about the black man in your white house.

There is no dictate. There is no federal law.

On behalf of institutions like University of North Carolina, the federal government has filed suit in order for the third branch of government to determine whether the law is a breach of civil rights.

In the meantime, the Federal government has made it clear that schools that do discriminate under the Republican piss place law may lose federal funding.

And as has already been pointed out, there is no perfect privacy in the bathroom...at least for men at urinals anyway. But last time I checked, we weren't all shitting like this....

public-toilets-at-the-latrine-at-ephesus-selcuk.jpg


...even in North Carolina, I know that there are these.

5a8csxgwe3fe5g7c.jpg


As for me, once I'm parked in a toilet stall....I really could care less who is taking a crap on either side of me. Or changing.

You really have nothing here.

I understand that where you come from men and women share holes outside, but not everyone wants to be "equal" with you again. You can hardly set your kind up as the gold standard of potty privacy for which every else must settle.
 
That statement doesn't even make any logical sense. Apparently, you've got nothing left in your meagre arsenal.
 
That statement doesn't even make any logical sense. Apparently, you've got nothing left in your meagre arsenal.

Your announcement that you don't care who craps next to you is an arrogant attempt to impose your low standard of privacy on others everyone. I don't think many ladies would like to join you.
 
Back
Top