Well, it is right out there in the open, isn't it.
Trump just takes his marching orders from the 2025 legal team.
He doesn't even think about the actual oath he took upon inauguration. And I suspect that they told him that if his hand wasn't on the bible, the words don't count.
No one who has ever listened to Donald J. Trump for more than 14 minutes knows quite well that honesty and integrity are not even possible for him. He is such an inveterate liar that he truly believes no one has those virtues. He is transactional. He will say anything and then the opposite, and claim CEO exemption when called on it. He is a true Tsarist.
We need to stop referring to him as king. Kings have constitutional limits and are subject to parliaments. He seriously envisions himself as the owner of the company and therefore can violate anything he damned well pleases. It tells you everything you need to know about how he has violated law and the SEC, FTC, EPA, HUD, and many others.
It's a representative democracy. The problem is not the elected. The problem is the electorate.
David Hogg has been out doing interviews saying that it's time to throw out old, stale, entrenched Democrats in safe districts and replace them with younger people who are more in touch with the problems of average Americans and you have a vision for reforming the system. He has the message right. Expertise can be developed in school boards, county governments, state governments and other federal government positions. We don't need a Congress full of in their 70s who die in office after serving 30+ years, and whose purpose is to perpetuate the stale bureaucratic system and then get themselves re-elected.
Hogg's plan to bring in a new energetic group with new ideas will work but only if the system is reformed to make every Congressional seat a competitive race for everyone. If we have a politicians like Alan Grayson, MTG, Matt Gaetz, Robert Menendez, Dennis Kucinich who get re-elected with big margins, we have a bigger problem with the electorate, with the primary system and with gerry-mandered districts.
I think I differ.
From the inception of demcracy, there have been base movements in populism. But, the successful democracies withstand that element, and the integrity of the elected prevails over the corrupt or anti-constitutional tendencies.
In America, both parties do and have gerrymandered.
The prevalence of mercenary disruptors is evidence of a no-confidence vote among the working class. The fact that the GOP successfully hijacked the working class vote from the Democrats after decades of being identified as the upper classes party is evidence of Trump riding the dissatisfaction, offering mere cultural victories while raping away the benefits the working man had in the federal government's agencies.
And all the GOP had to do was sell its soul, and play hard on abortiton in the pedals while running a fugue in the great and swell with hormone treatements for children of dysmorphic parenting and a full-throated rejection of that everything in white America is racist above all else. Hmmm, I wonder WHO could have let the opposition dwindle to only SJW topics instead of health care, minimum wage, and affordable housing?
You are in a state with some of the lowest turnout numbers in the country. Let's also add a fourth reason- some States have political power structures that make it as hard as possible to vote.
Presidential election years typically have a 60-70% turnout. Off year elections get about 45-55% of the electorate to turn out.
States like Alabama, California, Hawaii, Mississippi and Texas typically have turnout numbers that are below the norms. These states also have a large number of minority voters who are more inclined to vote Democrat.
But that doesn't get at the heart of the issue. Again, low voter turnout is a symptom, not the problem.
And, it isn't THAT hard to vote.
The electorate includes a large swath of uneducated citizens who have no clue about what politicies do what, nor do they care a whit. For many of them, their houses would have to be bulldozed before they'd make the effort to go vote. They simply don't care. And in that swath, I'm including many college educated persons who never learned anything in college outside their vocational training as business majors or some specialized technical field like IT or engineering. My co-worker, a decent guy with a teen son, a divorce, and a middle-class income, mentioned last yeart that he had never voted before 2024. He is in his mid-40's. I don't think he is rare at all.
Too many liberals argue that everything is about poverty and the least capable, but there are plenty of the poor that make it to a sports game or pop concert or casino or theme park when they want to, so showing up to vote once every four years isn't that big of a hurdle.
And many of the young see how little voting matters when GOP and Democrat alike claim to be helping, when what they are actually doing is helping their corporate lobbies and screwing the working man.
So, their no-show IS their vote.
That also explains why SO many support MAGA and its anti-constitutional strain. If the Constitution isn't helping in the current disintegration of Aamerican society, why would they care if it is ignored? It's not like the law is sacred to them. They see it bent for the rich every day. And they know Epstein didn't kill himself.