The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Sanders campaign loses $150 Million Dollars if we fold to DNC politics

they just simply do not care about anyone but themselves.

The juxtaposition of these two statements. You really can't make this stuff up. :rotflmao:

i hope the convention is a mess, i hope clinton is a damaged candidate and i hope she loses in november.

Oh and it won't be a mess. Hillary is 81% of the way to the nomination and about 90% the way polls are shaping up for next week and 100% before California even votes. Translation - she wins on the first ballot even if she gets a minority of superdelegates (which she won't).
 
To address the last part for now, I don't see that happening. The attitudes on both sides are more than likely stay the same. This isn't just a one sided thing. If you believe Hillary as clean as you claim, be my guest but a lot of us don't and there is plenty to back up If you want to believe in that or actually attempt to understand why people believe that, but I doubt that is gonna happen.

I am not here for the sake of discussion anymore, that ship has been gone awhile now.
 
To address the last part for now, I don't see that happening. The attitudes on both sides are more than likely stay the same. This isn't just a one sided thing. If you believe Hillary as clean as you claim, be my guest but a lot of us don't and there is plenty to back up If you want to believe in that or actually attempt to understand why people believe that, but I doubt that is gonna happen.

I am not here for the sake of discussion anymore, that ship has been gone awhile now.

On the contrary I've looked into it extensively, from Benghazi, to donations, to speeches, to Michael Schmidt's expose on the emails. Actually there is nothing unethical or even irregular about any of it. Remember that those trying to drum up noise and make these controversies into scandals have something to gain from doing it. Hillary still has one of the most liberal voting records from the Senate on a wide range of issues. So all of this negativity really is all in your mind. It's okay to think Bernie is better, but Hillary is no demon.
 
A repeat of the '68 convention will hand the election to the Republicans. It would badly damage the Democratic party for years to come.

@ evanrick, I will vote for Hillary. I can't take a repeat of the '04 election. Bush's win damn near drove me over the edge and I was far better off (mentally) then than I am now.

Back then (as now) I was looking to the future. I gambled my emotions and lost big time. I can't do that today. Clinton's "selfish supporters"? No, that would be Bernie supporters that will not get behind Hillary. They don't want to see the reality of the situation. And if Bernie isn't the nominee, they want to take their ball and go home. Thus fucking all of us. Not just the USA, the entire world.

Drumpf thinks that nukes on the Korean peninsula would be fine. Japan having nukes would be fine. And he didn't rule out tactical nukes in the fight against ISIS. Sure, drop one close to Russia's border and see what happens. WWIII.

And if it's Cruz instead of Drumpf, it puts us far closer to the religious right's wet-dream. Theocracy.
 
Sanders saying hes going all the way. I can understand Clintons supporters selfish attitude that HRC is suddenly entitled to every single Sanders supporter now that shes won her home state, but that comes at a price, a very high price. Its nothing but pure selfishness that the Clinton campaign has relied on since the beginning. I can also understand their desire for the sanders campaign to go away but its not going away, the DNC can go to hell. ..| and every single clinton supporter who thinks that sanders will just give away our leverage will somehow benefit the democratic party is exactly why they support clinton over ever other American. they just simply do not care about anyone but themselves. i hope the convention is a mess, i hope clinton is a damaged candidate and i hope she loses in november.

Do you believe that Clinton voters will all switch to support Sanders? The more liberal probably will. Certain women voters may become disillusioned.

It's the voters in the middle that tend to decide how it swings. Will they want someone more conservative than Sanders, if he's the candidate? Depends on how he can appeal to that sector.

Politically, America has been relatively conservative for the last 35 years or so, so it's a challenge.
 
On the contrary I've looked into it extensively, from Benghazi, to donations, to speeches, to Michael Schmidt's expose on the emails. Actually there is nothing unethical or even irregular about any of it. Remember that those trying to drum up noise and make these controversies into scandals have something to gain from doing it. Hillary still has one of the most liberal voting records from the Senate on a wide range of issues. So all of this negativity really is all in your mind. It's okay to think Bernie is better, but Hillary is no demon.

Benghazi is no concern of mine and I don't think Hillary is a demon, but neither is she an angel either. To say all the negativity is in my head is just insulting my intelligence and being disingenuous as if there is actually not legitimate reason to have anything against her. What is the point of even having a conversation on here when it is met with this? If my negativity about her is in my head, either prove that it is or don't claim something like that.
 
Benghazi is no concern of mine and I don't think Hillary is a demon, but neither is she an angel either. To say all the negativity is in my head is just insulting my intelligence and being disingenuous as if there is actually not legitimate reason to have anything against her. What is the point of even having a conversation on here when it is met with this? If my negativity about her is in my head, either prove that it is or don't claim something like that.

Negativity is a psychological bias characterized by the effect of giving greater weight to negative vs. positive information.

There is empirical evidence in political science that shows the importance of the negativity effect in the information processing of the voters. This effect can explain the observed decrease of popularity for a president the longer he is in office.

Negativity effect and the emergence of ideologies

So even if the email controversy was a lapse in judgement it isn't the sin her critics make it out to be, and Obama was rather clear about that. Donations and paid speeches haven't made Hillary into capitalist anti-Christ. Her record on liberal issues can be seen on votesmart.org. Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton both got 75% on "campaign finance" from Common Cause.
 
Well, actually I do check a wide variety of sites and have read a flood of angry and hurt lashing out comments yesterday, which is why I made the comment. JUB only has a couple of ardent supporters who have vented some frustration...but some of the comments on other sites read as though they were written by hysterical 14 year old children. It included a lot of 'I'm taking my vote and going home to sulk' type of comments along with a lot of the type that Evanrick has posted, accusing all Clinton supporters of being stupid, spineless, treacherous traitors intent on letting the woman who is responsible for everything including the Zika virus, destroy the US.

Well that is funny because I frequent reddit and where there is a not so much of a big fan base there when it comes to the general front page, I haven't seen as much of the sexist comments that are claimed to be made. Though I do not doubt they exist, but I see healthy criticism of on there as well as some of the nonsense that generally comes out, which makes sense considering how big the user base is.

But, what I also did see on there yesterday were not whining Bernie supporters about a loss, I saw plenty of people still in it to win, some people discussing local politics and wanting to get more progressive politicians where it also really matters, talking about even the likely scenario that he does not get the nomination that we shouldn't just forget the issues and the things he brought forward and how far he's gotten. Which I agree with wholeheartedly.

I get why people are upset. Bernie has made a tremendous showing. He has contributed immensely to the discussion that the US needs to have about politics and the destruction of the middle class. As I have repeatedly noted....he is the closest thing to a Canadian politician that the US has and I would have been delighted to see him emerge as the president of the United States. I even visited his campaign office last year while in Vermont and told his staff how much we admire the man.

People weren't just upset about a loss, they were also upset at the fact that they are being forced into a two party system just to vote for who they want to vote for, if people were registered as anything but Democrat they could not vote for him. Which is ridiculous and even the deadline being 6 months ago, is also ridiculous considering not everyone is sold on a candidate that much ahead of time.

And yes he was an independent that changed to Democrat, which one could argue that at one point they could have voted for him but either way people would be locked out for voting for them because nonsense voting rules.

There were also tons of problems at a lot of voting places and this has been problems in multiple states, its great that people want to turn out to vote but discouraging when things like this happen when a lot of these issues could have been resolved before Tuesday.

I personally want to see his campaign continue and to see his message get taken on board by the Democrats because in the extremely limiting and stifling two party corporatist political party system in the US, the voices of progressives and the disaffected left are being lost in the noise.

But I also recognize that the US has to move beyond the crippling paralysis of a destructive right wing political movement in Washington and at the state level...that it isn't about the president...it is about moulding the Judiciary and re-establishing bi-partisan, centrist action on a host of domestic and foreign policy issues.

It is simply too much to demand that someone could come in and take over the entire Democrat party because they want to run for President and push so hard to the left in such an incredibly short period of time that traditional centrist liberals would all flood to his side. There hasn't been any hocus pocus or theft of this election. Hillary has spent decades moving to this moment.....quite simply, she has gathered several millions more votes in the process so far than Bernie. So super-delegates aside, what we are seeing is a democratic process in action.

The fact of the matter is that he has been down played since he got into the race and no matter how far he has come, it is still down played continually. Even though coming from someone who is only getting donations from people, he is still in the race regardless of how it looks. People don't believe he is going to walk in and snap his fingers, then everything will magically be okay with America, but I think it is disingenuous to believe that if he did get in he wouldn't be be able to do anything. It would be hard for him to get the things he wants to get through and they will most definitely will have to come to a compromise, but that is very well expected and this would be the same way it works with Hillary although people have a tendency to ignore this.

As for Hillary I do not believe that she is outright stealing this election, she has name recognition and has been involved for a very long time it is a no brainer that POTUS was in the line of her sights. She is qualified, I get it. She has also shown to continually lie or attempt to misinform, she plays a smear campaign but spins it around to try to act like Bernie has a bad "tone", she made tons of claims about him that were found out to be completely untrue. The sexism exists, but when it comes to the supporter base they are ready to fire that gun when every time someone has a problem with her.

As much as people do get what the alternative, you're not winning over his supporter base when you do these kind of things to a candidate. That fault isn't upon his supporters, that is her fault.

I pointed out about a week ago how much farther she'd be ahead of Bernie if the Democrats had a winner take all approach to the Primaries and Caucuses. So it is clear that the Democrat process has favoured Bernie maintaining a stronger showing than simple democracy would have awarded him.

I just wish that as the country moves toward the real race in November, that Bernie's supporters will see what the real stakes are and that the bad feelings, bitterness and disappointment will be put aside. As far as JUB goes, I would hope that we don't lose another group of posters because of the primary results and that people will still continue to have spirited exchanges focussing on policies of the Democrats and the Republicans.

Again, Bernie supporters are well aware of what they stakes are. Treating them as if they do not because they still refuse to support a candidate they do not like is not correct. Just because they don't want to support her does not mean they don't understand who the other candidates are, and this is coming from someone who agrees with the sentiment of keeping democrats in office. Which again, is another problem that came straight from the Hillary candidacy, the supporter base was played down to being lazy uninformed people. For someone who obviously should gain the support of the opposing democratic candidates supporter base, this was another thing that wasn't exactly smart to do.
 
Negativity is a psychological bias characterized by the effect of giving greater weight to negative vs. positive information.

So even if the email controversy was a lapse in judgement it isn't the sin her critics make it out to be, and Obama was rather clear about that. Donations and paid speeches haven't made Hillary into capitalist anti-Christ. Her record on liberal issues can be seen on votesmart.org. Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton both got 75% on "campaign finance" from Common Cause.

None of this proves that the negativity I have for her is in my head nor does it address the fact that the majority of you act like there is absolutely no reason to have a problem with her at all.
 
If you paid attention to my posts you would know the answer to this.



As said above, I already posted multiple times. It is clear people believe what they want to believe regardless of what ones says though.

How shall I say this nicely, keeping track of the opinions of an anonymous net persona, on a gay porn site - isn't exactly a priority in my life.

Frankly if you're making your decisions about who to vote for based on this place, you need to go eat a huge bowl of perspective.
 
... if people were registered as anything but Democrat they could not vote for him. Which is ridiculous and even the deadline being 6 months ago, is also ridiculous considering not everyone is sold on a candidate that much ahead of time...

WHY should people who aren't Democrats, be allowed to vote in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRIMARY?

Simply because their candidate is a carpetbagger who didn't have the principles to run as the independent he is?

- - - Updated - - -

Millions of people were registered as Democrats for decades and decades.
 
WHY should people who aren't Democrats, be allowed to vote in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRIMARY?

Simply because their candidate is a carpetbagger who didn't have the principles to run as the independent he is?

- - - Updated - - -

Millions of people were registered as Democrats for decades and decades.

^^This, this, this and thousand times this. Brilliant.

Not to mention that the rules of the Democratic primary process were set when he chose to utilize the Democratic party to further his Presidential aspirations. You knew the game and the rules when you signed on to this ride. Whining when it didn't work out makes him look small.
 
^^This, this, this and thousand times this. Brilliant.

Not to mention that the rules of the Democratic primary process were set when he chose to utilize the Democratic party to further his Presidential aspirations. You knew the game and the rules when you signed on to this ride. Whining when it didn't work out makes him look small.

Not to mention that his campaign is now saying that if Hillary gets more pledged delegates and more votes, he's going to go promise things to the super-delegates and get them to deny the "will of the people."

Haven't they been whining about how "undemocratic" super-delegates are from the beginning? Oh well, what's one more principle out the window.
 
3dsmax7_bowl_perspective.gif
 
WHY should people who aren't Democrats, be allowed to vote in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRIMARY?

Simply because their candidate is a carpetbagger who didn't have the principles to run as the independent he is?

- - - Updated - - -

Millions of people were registered as Democrats for decades and decades.

lol what a short memory

Bernie is more of a Democrat in terms of platform and goals

Hillary is Democrat-light - progressive-not

as for carpetbagging that's a Hillary move - picking a state to run for Senate in - a state that's teed up

that's carpetbagging
 
How shall I say this nicely, keeping track of the opinions of an anonymous net persona, on a gay porn site - isn't exactly a priority in my life.

Frankly if you're making your decisions about who to vote for based on this place, you need to go eat a huge bowl of perspective.

Then maybe you shouldn't make assumptions that I made up my mind about voting, if you can't be bothered to keep track. And I don't know where you get the idea that I am making decisions based on this place, but you apparently are the one that needs a better perspective considering the amount of assumptions you are making about me of an apparent anonymous persona you don't keep track of.

WHY should people who aren't Democrats, be allowed to vote in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRIMARY?

Simply because their candidate is a carpetbagger who didn't have the principles to run as the independent he is?

- - - Updated - - -

Millions of people were registered as Democrats for decades and decades.

Calm your tits, and I should have been more specific that I was talking about independent voters who couldn't vote for Bernie, who would have more than likely have. I understand New York is one of the closed primary states, but it doesn't address the fact that my problem is that these undecided voters don't have their minds made up 6 months ago which was the deadline.
 
Then maybe you shouldn't make assumptions that I made up my mind about voting, if you can't be bothered to keep track. And I don't know where you get the idea that I am making decisions based on this place, but you apparently are the one that needs a better perspective considering the amount of assumptions you are making about me of an apparent anonymous persona you don't keep track of.

Sugar, I was being nice, up-thread you accused me of not convincing you, so baldly, I could give a tinker's damn about your opinion, so long as I find you amusing, I'll engage, when you bore me, I'll ignore you.



Calm your tits, and I should have been more specific that I was talking about independent voters who couldn't vote for Bernie, who would have more than likely have. I understand New York is one of the closed primary states, but it doesn't address the fact that my problem is that these undecided voters don't have their minds made up 6 months ago which was the deadline.

Repeating the preposterous claim that the Democratic Primary should be convenient for independents doesn't refute the fact that they aren't Democrats and if they want to participate in a DEMOCRATIC PARTY FUNCTION, then fucking register and be a Democrat, or fuck the hell off.

Which perfectly addresses your silly "problem."
 
lol what a short memory

Bernie is more of a Democrat in terms of platform and goals

Hillary is Democrat-light - progressive-not

as for carpetbagging that's a Hillary move - picking a state to run for Senate in - a state that's teed up

that's carpetbagging

Bernie is a Democrat because he can't get elected without hijacking the Democratic Party machine.

Once again, you pretend this isn't so because you like Bernie, and this has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Hillary.
 
Back
Top