The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Seriously, George Santos deserves his own thread

TX-Beau said:
Joy, we are now free to be deplorable assholes in public.
Click to expand...
rareboy said:
Since the 2008 election, the permission to be deplorable assholes in public seems to have exponentially expanded until today it is really just a huge black hole that will suck everyone into the vortex...
Click to expand...
Welcome to equality. šŸ³ļøā€šŸŒˆ
 
I remember back when we were all shocked when Sen David Vitter (R-LA) remained in Congress after his prostitution scandal. Or how much time and effort it took to boot James Traficant (D-OH) out of office after he was convicted of 10 felonies while serving in Congress.

George Santos (R-NY) is still in Congress, and he's running for another term. However, he's having problems raising money and he's being forced to refund past donations.

www.politico.com

George Santos is refunding more money than heā€™s raising ā€” and belatedly reported debts from 2022

The filing comes as Santos faces legal trouble related in part to his handling of campaign funds and past reports with the FEC.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
Santosā€™ campaign refunded more than $35,000 to donors between July and September while taking in only $1,704 in new donations, according to his latest campaign finance report. His campaign also spent more than $42,000 over the period, $20,000 of which was classified as legal expenses. That left him with less than $23,000 in his campaign account.
Click to expand...
 
...Itā€™s a tale that probably only George Santos could tellā€”though Santos declined to provide any documentation to back up his assertions. The story that The Daily Beast uncovered ranges across the United States, crosses the partisan divide, and touches upon a dark money machine feeding unsourced cash to state races across the country. It plays out as a stupefying run of errors, gaffes, confusion, and misdirection that could, on some level, give Santos a run for his money. And somehow, because of course, Mike Lindell is involved...
Click to expand...


These people are despicable. There is no way to summarize this, read it for yourself, I dare you to make any kind of sense out of it.
 
It all reads exactly as I would expect. Clumsy. Ham Fisted. Probably some weird sexual past thrown into the mix somewhere. Or as is more often the case....really petty shysters and grifters who somehow actually thought they were smarter than the press and the authorities.

Throw Datwyler and Olson into the clink and let's see how clear the story about the payoffs and the scam beomes.
 
rareboy said:
It all reads exactly as I would expect. Clumsy. Ham Fisted. Probably some weird sexual past thrown into the mix somewhere. Or as is more often the case....really petty shysters and grifters who somehow actually thought they were smarter than the press and the authorities.

Throw Datwyler and Olson into the clink and let's see how clear the story about the payoffs and the scam beomes.
Click to expand...
Working theory: The elders (and semi-elders) learned the grift from THEIR elders who were able to pull off their scams before the internet when you couldn't just type someone's name into google and see their arrest record, tax returns, et cetera. They don't realize how easy it is to get caught with your hand in the cookie jar. I found Lavern Unice Elie's tax lien information without even trying, like, on accident. And a bathing suit selfie. :bartshock
 
Kitara is going to have a fit. the NY delegation of Republicans has forced a vote to expel her from Congress. It's next Wed. Just missing Halloween.

It's probably not going to pass though for the same reason Kevin didn't toss her.
 
Santos is retaliating by trying to censure a Democrat ](*,)

www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com

As Some Republicans Move to Expel Santos the Embattled Lawmaker Tries to Censure a Democrat

House Republicans from New York will be moving to expel U.S. Rep. George Santos (R-NY), who is facing 23 federal criminal felony charges, but as they ramp up their efforts the New York Congressman is working to censure a House Democrat. Representative Santos now faces ā€œone count of conspiracy to...
www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com
 
Gee, I'm so surprised, no really, no one saw that coming
 
TX-Beau said:
Gee, I'm so surprised, no really, no one saw that coming
Click to expand...
Pretty much this....the GQP won't give up a single vote...but they have pretty much guaranteed they will lose the seat.
 
I was trying to find out the breakdown on this vote. Anyone know where to find it?

I'm glad Bucks County, PA's "independent" Republican congressman Brian Fitzpatrick voted "yes." In his swing district, standing with liars might be a liability.
 
Thad1527 said:
I was trying to find out the breakdown on this vote. Anyone know where to find it?

I'm glad Bucks County, PA's "independent" Republican congressman Brian Fitzpatrick voted "yes." In his swing district, standing with liars might be a liability.
Click to expand...
Votes are reported on the House Clerk's website daily:

clerk.house.gov

Roll Call 564 Roll Call 564, Bill Number: H. Res. 773, 118th Congress, 1st Session

VOTE QUESTION: On Agreeing to the Resolution, DESCRIPTION: Providing for the expulsion of Representative George Santos from the House of Representatives, VOTE TYPE: 2/3 Yea-And-Nay, STATUS: Failed
clerk.house.gov
 
From the above...this failed because of the Dems too....look at the number not voting or voting present...standing with liars seems to be something that reps of both sides are happy to do.
 
rareboy said:
From the above...this failed because of the Dems too....look at the number not voting or voting present...standing with liars seems to be something that reps of both sides are happy to do.
Click to expand...
A couple of the Dems who voted "Nay" said they did so because they thought it would be a bad precedent to remove an elected representative without a conviction. I get that. Santos is innocent until convicted. Probably this was more virtue-signalling to give cover to NY Republicans who are afraid of losing their seats to Democrats in 2024. This way, they can says "We tried! See?".

The Republicans via Marge filed a motion to censure Rashida Tlaib. The Dems then filed a motion to censure Marge. 23 Republicans voted against that resolution which killed both.

I have a feeling this is going to be how things roll for the next 12 months.
 
Thanks for the link. I'm pleased my Congresswoman voted yea, and dismayed that three other Eastern PA Democrats voted "present" or abstained
 
Jamie Raskin's reply to Santos' note thanking him for his vote against expelling him.

399082742_917806996371985_7255985544155816016_n.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top