The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

State Sponsored Homophobia: World Homosexuality Laws

No, he's implying that the gays were just as persecuted as they are now, and it's not the British' fault. Of course, that ignores the fact that gays weren't really a thing ANYWHERE at the time, yet countries where religious dogma has been replaced with reason and logic have embraced LGBT rights. And the reason for why Africa is mired in religious dogma is very much the British.

There, history lesson done.

But it's got to be because of a certain attitude or such of the religious British, because the French and Portugese and others were also religious. That's why I pin this on the Puritan strain, which was outwardly busy-body almost solely in its British manifestation. That was what put the laws in place, and also why the laws are arguably more symptom than cause: the same religio-cultural imperialism which made that law even acceptable served to drive the whole British Empire.

So it could be said that the problem is not so much the law but the attitude that it's legitimate to use the force of the state to impose religious views behind it which is the problem. Thus for the most part the countries which have those laws have inherited the attitude, though some have escaped, while it's also evident that some few countries lacking that law share the attitude.


BTW, to see the connection between the British Empire and religious imperialism, one need only take note of the concept of "The White Man's Burden". And, looking around, if white men indeed had a burden, it was discharged rather poorly.
 
I shall call for "loaves and fishes."

Random gray-matter connections . . .

I learned a song about "Five Loaves and Two Fishes" from an Eastern Orthodox priest, to whom the miracle of the feeding of the thousands was that a bunch of hard-nosed Semites were actually stirred to share what they were hiding by the example of a child.

I suspect that in Father Rob's opinion, calling for "loaves and fishes" to be taken to Africa would be the Christian route to go, not encouraging madness that shares a heart with the Spanish Inquisition.
 
But it's got to be because of a certain attitude or such of the religious British, because the French and Portugese and others were also religious.

Not to mention the large amounts of Islam in North and West Africa.

-d-
 
I excused myself from the forum for a few days to reflect on this thread.

My apologies to DreamTeam, Kallipolis, TX-Beau, Pat and others for behaving the way I did. While I stand by my perspective on the situation I should have been more civil and said it with a bit more tact than I did.

That being said, there is so much more reporting on the situation I will continue with. Watch this space.
 
Back
Top