Oh, I quite agree with you, and in non-tipping situations (retail, business, non-American restaurants) payment has nothing to do with good service. I mean, I give great customer service, and I don't get tips for it.Most Americans believe that an included service charge makes the service worse, because you get the same tip whether or not the service is bad.
That's an old wives' tale, a HUGE misconception, Swellegant, and I'll tell you why.
I worked in a job like that once, and while we did not have to worry about "not getting tipped", we did have to worry—from one minute to the next—about complaints about slow service. That worry was never very far away from our minds.
Waiters who got a lot of complaints about slow service were subject to discipline, up to and including dismissal.
I'm just saying that tipping is a mechanism by which you can exercise discretion over how much you pay for the service. Tipping isn't going anywhere, the degree of governmental reforms and cultural reprogramming required to reverse an institutionalized tradition like tipping is simply not going to happen. I was just trying to give people a way of looking at the practice that made a certain kind of sense.
The whole issue of tipping (in the US) is that it doesn't matter why you must tip, or why you think you shouldn't have to tip; what matters is that you are expected to tip just as much as you're expected to pay your bill. It is a cultural contract, but no less imperative than a legal contract. If you don't want to tip, don't eat in table-service US restaurants. That is the very bottom line.

