The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Humor-Satire Trump Staff Picks, Co-Conspirators and the Revolving Door of Departures [2024 Edition]

rareboy said:
Meanwhile, Patel flew off the rails in a Senate hearing, screaming over Schiff's questioning...I was amazed that he was allowed to go on as long as he did, but I suppose the gavel is in the hands of a GQPer looking to get some good sound bites for the right wing news oultets.

Patel has to go.
Click to expand...
You might also want to listen to Patel's exchange with Cory Booker, who is usually one of the more civil Senators.

Patel is failing. His little show was an embarrassment to those of us who are familiar with the past 40+ years of Senate hearings. The evidence is that the White House is bringing in more experienced people to try to get the FBI back on track until they figure out what to do with Patel.

This is a legacy of the Kavanaugh hearings: performance for an audience of 1. They really believe that if they bark like a seal for Trump, he'll save their job. History shows that Trump will... until he doesn't.
 
Pam Bondi talks the big talk but apparently she's running an incompetent department. Either that or the people her department is prosecuting don't resemble a ham sandwich. 🤣

www.latimes.com

Trump's top federal prosecutor in L.A. struggles to secure indictments in protest cases

U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli has aggressively pushed for indictments in the high-profile prosecutions of people arrested during demonstrations against federal immigration actions in Southern California, leading to an incident that sources said involved an outburst overheard by grand jurors.
www.latimes.com www.latimes.com
U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli has aggressively pushed for indictments in the high-profile prosecutions of people arrested during demonstrations against federal immigration actions in Southern California, leading to an incident that sources said involved an outburst overheard by grand jurors.

To bystanders at the federal courthouse in downtown Los Angeles, it sounded as though U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli would not take no for an answer.

A prosecutor had the irate Trump administration appointee on speakerphone outside the grand jury room, and his screaming was audible, according to three law enforcement officials aware of the encounter who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.

The grand jury had just refused to indict someone accused of attacking federal law enforcement officers during protests against the recent immigration raids throughout Southern California, two of the federal officials said.
Click to expand...



Meanwhile, people who give Trump money get their charges dropped:
www.latimes.com

Feds move to drop charges in controversial cases as Trump re-ups L.A. prosecutor

The U.S. Attorney's office in Los Angeles is seeking to dismiss charges against a sheriff's deputy who has already been sentenced for use of excessive force and a fast food executive whose case previously led to one prosecutor's firing by President Trump.
www.latimes.com www.latimes.com
Just hours after the Trump administration moved to extend U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli’s term as Los Angeles’ top federal law enforcement official, prosecutors moved to dismiss charges in a pair of controversial criminal cases, including one involving a donor to the president.

In a motion filed late Tuesday, federal prosecutors sought to dismiss an indictment accusing Andrew Wiederhorn, former chief executive of the company that owns the Fatburger and Johnny Rockets chains, of carrying out a $47-million “sham loan” scheme.
Click to expand...

Pam Bondi, shown here describing Trump's erection.
PamBondi-darkroots-usatsi-25349358-1544x1086.jpg
 
Last edited:
And all of this time, I thought that Pam Bondi was confirmed for Attorney General because of her extensive knowledge of the Constitution:

Is a basic understanding of the First Amendment too much to expect from the nation’s Attorney General? Progressives have spent years trying to create and define a category called “hate speech.” This misunderstanding of the First Amendment seems to have infiltrated the D.C. water supply because AG Pam Bondi repeated it Monday in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Discussing Kirk’s work on college campuses, Ms. Bondi mentioned the “disgusting” antisemitism on display at many universities, and so far so good. But wait. “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place—especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society,” the country’s top law enforcer told a podcast. “We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”
Click to expand...

These days, it's not often that someone receives pushback from both the left and the right.

www.theatlantic.com

The Attorney General’s Attack on Free Speech

Pam Bondi stated that the federal government will “go after” Americans “if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
Pam Bondi stated that the federal government will “go after” Americans “if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”

Attorney General Pam Bondi, America’s highest-ranking law-enforcement official, declared in an interview posted to YouTube yesterday that federal law enforcement will “go after” Americans for hate speech. “There’s free speech, and then there’s hate speech,” she said. In fact, there is no hate-speech exception to the First Amendment.

In a post on X this morning, Bondi tried to qualify her comments. But the fact that the attorney general of the United States publicly misrepresented long-standing American speech law is ominous, especially in the context of threats made by other Trump-administration officials, their allies, and President Donald Trump himself to target “left-wing” organizations that the administration says promote violence. When ABC News’s Jonathan Karl asked the president this morning what he made of Bondi’s hate-speech comments, Trump responded, “She’ll probably go after people like you, because you treat me so unfairly. It’s hate. You have a lot of hate in your heart.” Let’s be clear about what’s happening: At a moment of polarization and political violence, the president and his attorney general are attacking a constitutional right that protects all Americans from abusive majorities.
Click to expand...
 
Bondi is the perfect pick for a totalitarian government...she just pulls pronouncements out of her ass and delivers them like they are the law of the land.

And I want to think she is intelligent and educated enough to know that she is just lying

The real objectives are a) intimidation b) playing to the MAGAt base

We know from numerous examples that Free Speech is the far right spewing any amount of invective they wnat to and Hate Speech is now anything that Musk doesn't like on Xitter.
 
rareboy said:
Bondi is the perfect pick for a totalitarian government...she just pulls pronouncements out of her ass and delivers them like they are the law of the land.

And I want to think she is intelligent and educated enough to know that she is just lying

The real objectives are a) intimidation b) playing to the MAGAt base

We know from numerous examples that Free Speech is the far right spewing any amount of invective they wnat to and Hate Speech is now anything that Musk doesn't like on Xitter.
Click to expand...
Bondi was Attorney General of Florida a decade ago when Rick Scott was governor. She was not as bad as she is now. She was a shill for Scott but she did do some worthwhile investigations. She even worked with Democratic District Attorneys back then. The first time that I met her, I thought that she was a overly tan college kid hired to work the event, after all, Janet Reno was also an Attorney General for Florida, too.

Then she got a Kellyanne style makeover [read: lots of plastic surgery] and started working as a lobbyist, Fox News pundit and Trump surrogate. That seems to have destroyed any remaining professional ethics that she had from a decade ago.
 
I love Sotomayor's take down that I posted in another thread.

I could feel the slap to Bondi's face all the way up here.

This was it by the way for those not able to find it.

Loading…

www.politico.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bafkreielbkqhtunv3x2imkakkboawollko3atnwj726gh3dzifzzkbitva@jpeg
 
rareboy said:
bafkreielbkqhtunv3x2imkakkboawollko3atnwj726gh3dzifzzkbitva@jpeg
Click to expand...
And a reminder:

1758143344596.png

Only 2 Republicans - Murkowski [R-AK] and Collins [R-ME] - voted against Ka$h Patel. Every other Republican voted to confirm.
 
"Homan is the victim here. They forced him to take that cash. They should prosecute those rogue agents.

Oh wait.

Sorry.

I was cosplaying MAGA."

- seen today on Bluesky.
 
Of course the narrative will change again and again as the WH looks to gaslight everyone.

But Homan is safe. There is literally no one to charge him or prosecute him now.


bafkreieta5amib6m5k77qlupqzj5f7722upuuh7v2pj4xhsmijm7jslnvi@jpeg
 
rareboy said:
Of course the narrative will change again and again as the WH looks to gaslight everyone.

But Homan is safe. There is literally no one to charge him or prosecute him now.


bafkreieta5amib6m5k77qlupqzj5f7722upuuh7v2pj4xhsmijm7jslnvi@jpeg
Click to expand...
Apparently, the Homan thing came out of another investigation down in Texas. A subject of an FBI investigation told an undercover agent that Homan was accepting cash payments in exchange for promises to direct contracts to the people paying him money.

The $50K was in a Cava restaurant bag and he took it. That's just the payment that the FBI got him, on camera, taking. There was likely other bribes that Homan took from those other people that he promised Federal contracts.

This is another Epstein thing: release the files, release the video of Homan NOT accepting the bribe from the undercover agents. That will exonerate him.
 
Last edited:
This is what happens when you hire a podcaster to lead the FBI.

The FBI tried to incinerate methamphetamine in an animal shelter crematorium. Animal shelter employees were exposed to smoke from burning meth. They had to be evacuated, treated under hazmat precautions and then all 14 employees spent 3 hours in a hyperbaric oxygen treatment unit.

Loading…

www.idahostatejournal.com
Meth burn by FBI smokes out Montana animal shelter
Workers at a Montana animal shelter were evacuated and sent to the hospital after smoke from two pounds of methamphetamine incinerated by FBI agents started to fill the building

A cloud of smoke from two pounds of methamphetamine seized by the FBI and incinerated inside a Montana animal shelter sent its workers to the hospital, city officials in Billings said.

The smoke started to fill the building during a drug burn on Wednesday, apparently because of negative pressure that sucked it back inside, Billings Assistant City Administrator Kevin Iffland said Friday. A fan was supposed to be on hand in such situations to reverse the pressure so smoke would flow out of the building, but Iffland said it wasn’t readily available.

The incinerator is used primarily to burn carcasses of animals euthanized or collected by the city’s animal control division. But every couple of months local law enforcement or FBI agents use it to burn seized narcotics, Iffland said.

Fourteen workers from the nonprofit Yellowstone Valley Animal Shelter evacuated and went to the hospital. The shelter’s 75 dogs and cats were relocated or put into foster homes, said Iffland and shelter director Triniti Halverson.
Click to expand...


hyperbaric.jpg


68cb722b3cbeb.image.png
 
Lindsey Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist.

She has never prosecuted a case.
 
rareboy said:
Lindsey Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist.

She has never prosecuted a case.
Click to expand...
Apparently, she couldn't get a DOJ employed prosecutor to sign the Comey indictment, as is the custom. She showed up in person in Federal Court. The judge called her up to the bench, held up two documents and asked her which "indictment" was the real indictment, since there were two different documents that had been filed with the Court.

Halligan responded she didn't know as she had not seen the filing.

The judge responded, "Both documents have your signature on them?".

One of former Federal prosecutors who is now a talking head on cable news asked whether Halligan even knew what a criminal indictment was, since there's no evidence that she's ever filed one in any court.

The fact that Halligan signed the indictment may resolve the case quickly. There's some question about whether she could be appointed as an "interim" US Attorney since her predecessor was an interim, too. It has been more than 120 days since Trump took office and interim US Attorneys can only serve for 120 days before the Federal Courts intervene to appoint a permanent US Attorney.
 
This was so sloppily handled that hopefully a federal judge would be able to make it go away before it becomes more of a dark farce.

I don't know how much direction a judge provides to a GJ panel, but I would hope that they would have enough not to embarrass themselves by setting up something that
will fail immediately on the merits of the indictment if it goes to court.

This will be another good test as to whether a Grand Jury would indict a ham sandwich.

I only wish I could feel more empathy or sympathy for Comey, but his attempted ruination and career building by pursuing Martha Stewart and his ruination of the campaign by Clinton make him one of my despised opportunists in politics. The fact that he then went on to help enable TrumpCo. in his first term is anathema as well.

But like David Frum, I see the danger being signalled here.

www.theatlantic.com

The Comey Indictment Is Not Just Payback

It’s a glimpse of Trump’s next attempt to seize power.
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top