The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Trump this.

and-the-lawyers-advocating-for-the-use-of-the-14th-v0-0gqq30s27nmb1.jpg
 
Thoughts and prayers for P01135809. 💭🙏

This is on top of the previous $5 million that E. Jean Carroll won against the Tangerine Twitter Machine.

A federal judge ruled that the jury hearing E. Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit will only need to decide how much money Donald Trump will have to pay her, after the judge found the former president was liable for making defamatory statements...

Judge Lewis Kaplan said that a federal jury’s verdict earlier this year against Trump will carry over to the defamation case set to go to trial in January involving statements Trump made in 2019 about Carroll’s sexual assault allegations.
Click to expand...
 

Trump suffers big loss in E. Jean Carroll defamation case, judge says he’s liable​


"
  • A federal judge ruled that Donald Trump is liable for defamatory statements he made about writer E. Jean Carroll in 2019 when she went public with claims he raped her decades earlier.
  • Judge Lewis Kaplan said the upcoming trial for Carroll’s civil lawsuit against Trump will only deal with the question of how much the former president should pay her in monetary damages.
  • In May, a jury in Manhattan federal court in a related case found that Trump sexually abused Carroll during an encounter in a New York department store in the mid-1990s, and defamed her last fall.
"

www.cnbc.com

Trump suffers big loss in E. Jean Carroll defamation case, judge says he's liable

Donald Trump is set to stand trial in a defamation case by E. Jean Carroll just as the 2024 Republican presidential nomination primaries are set to start.
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com
 
At Rump's rally with Krusti Noem.....

Pretty meagre crowd.

376751726_870823454412218_5046496685541291733_n.jpg
 
I don't know if the scoreboard is predictive, but it looks like Trump has racked up 3 digits worth of penalties? We're only at 91 so far...unless they are counting in the other cases against him he's already lost.
 
Trump gets a warm reception when he turns up for ballgame in Iowa yesterday.

image.jpg
 
rareboy said:
And why the fuck are there two of them?

It is ridiculous that the cows have more senatorial representation than Californians.
Click to expand...
In theory, that is what the House is supposed to be for... only they capped the number of House members a while back, so the House does't accurately reflect the apportionment, either. In more populous States, the number of citizens in a single district is larger than in the States with lower populations.

For example, Wyoming has a single district for the whole State of Wyoming, which has a population of 579K. California, population 40 million, has 52 representatives and New York, population 20 million, has 26 representatives (avg 770K per district). Puerto Rico, population 3.26 MILLION, has a single representative but no Senators because it's not a State. Washington DC (population 713K) also has no Senators.

When the Democrats are in power, the House gets caught up in virtue signalling legislation when, if they had a plan, they could fix this problem with representation pretty easily. If Tuberville can get away with holding the military hostage over a single issue that he could never get the votes to change, then why can't Senate Democrats play hard ball for these big issues?
 
The US will be forever broken as long as it does not follow representation by population.
 
Thad1527 said:
Didn't the Supreme Court rile that STATE legislatures could only be allocated by population?

rareboy said:
The Senate though....
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I'm not sure which case and ruling is being mentioned here. The one that comes to mind is Reynolds v Sims (1964) which said that State Legislatures must have equal representation based upon population (one person, one vote).

For example, some States used to allocate representation in the State legislature by drawing districts based upon county lines. The SCOTUS decision said that lines must be drawn for State Legislative districts so that each district (and therefore each State Representative or State Senator) represents approximately the same number of people in all bodies of the Legislature.

The Federal system has a different standard for the US Senate which is based upon lines drawn that define each State... or in another way of thinking, the US Senate has two people who represent land and whatever people and businesses reside upon that land. This makes it all the more egregious that Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia do not have representation in the Senate. Both PR and DC are land that the US claims as its own but by not defining that land as a "State", it disenfranchises the citizens who and businesses that reside upon that land.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top