The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Trump this.

Someone knows that Meadows not only flipped, he could help seal the deal on conviction....and those damned viscous Rinos and Rats.

FyETY2JWYAAgF3X
 
Viscous rinos?
Through him under the bus?
A stollen election?

English is purportedly his first (only?) language, is it not
 
"Viscous" is a perfectly good word for Mark Meadows and his lot.

Following up on yesterday's discussion, WaPo also picked up on the venue issue:

Trump special counsel shifts focus of possible indictment to S. Florida

Justice Department prosecutors are planning to bring a significant portion of any charges stemming from the possible mishandling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, the home of former president Donald Trump, at a nearby federal court in South Florida, according to people familiar with the matter.

The legal rationale for such a move is that the bulk of the conduct at issue in the investigation occurred in the southern district of Florida, in and around Trump’s Palm Beach residence and private club, even if much of the investigation — led by special counsel Jack Smith — has been handled by a grand jury in D.C., these people said.

A former aide to Trump, Taylor Budowich, appeared Wednesday before the federal grand jury in Miami. Other witnesses have appeared before the same grand jury in recent weeks, a person familiar with the matter said.

If Trump is charged on his home turf, he could face a significantly different jury pool than the one in Washington. Such a move could also speed up the path to a trial, former federal prosecutor Randall D. Eliason said, because it could eliminate potential legal challenges about whether charges were being brought in the right place.
Click to expand...
 
I saw that...but I see real jeopardy, unless the evidence is so overwhelmingly damning, of having Trump potentially having a jury of white, rich Trumpists or just GOP stalwarts who would let him walk because he is 'one of them'.
 
pigface said:
Viscous rinos?
Through him under the bus?
A stollen election?

English is purportedly his first (only?) language, is it not
Click to expand...
Written English is the first language for him like it is for a backward, 7 year old.
 
rareboy said:
I saw that...but I see real jeopardy, unless the evidence is so overwhelmingly damning, of having Trump potentially having a jury of white, rich Trumpists or just GOP stalwarts who would let him walk because he is 'one of them'.
Click to expand...
And I wouldn't be surprised if Florida MAGA jury candidates would lie during voir dire.

I do think Florida should consider drug testing jury members. ;)
 
If Mark Meadows has a limited immunity deal, if I were one of these insurrectionists, I would likely be pretty worried about the records and testimony that he provided to Jack Smith.


FyGR-eEXsAESUH4
 
And of course, we know that these asked Trump for pardons.

FyDc7R2WIAAWvPL
 
KaraBulut said:
"Viscous" is a perfectly good word for Mark Meadows and his lot.

Following up on yesterday's discussion, WaPo also picked up on the venue issue:

Click to expand...
Probably whatever crimes originated in Florida will be charged there, but the primary offense happened in D.C. The people who will be charged in Florida are probably going to be the people who are involved in the cover-up.
 
I just watched a new Trump campaign ad (wolves) in which they talk about Biden's "money-grubbing corruption".

Mirror Mirror On The Wall...

(Sorry. Can't find the article or video again.)
 
rareboy said:
If Mark Meadows has a limited immunity deal, if I were one of these insurrectionists, I would likely be pretty worried about the records and testimony that he provided to Jack Smith.


FyGR-eEXsAESUH4
Click to expand...

I wonder who Mark knifed in the back. I hope it's Toad, but maybe not.
 
gsdx said:
I just watched a new Trump campaign ad (wolves) in which they talk about Biden's "money-grubbing corruption".

Mirror Mirror On The Wall...

(Sorry. Can't find the article or video again.)
Click to expand...
Don't worry, nobody wants to see it anyway. I no longer even listen to anything the Toad vomits up.
 
gsdx said:
I just watched a new Trump campaign ad (wolves) in which they talk about Biden's "money-grubbing corruption".

Mirror Mirror On The Wall...

(Sorry. Can't find the article or video again.)
Click to expand...
That's one of Trump's "tells".

If he's making an over-the-top accusation, there's two things you can assume:
  1. He considers that person a real threat.
  2. The Trump family or Trump organization commits the same offense.

It's a bizarre slip of the Karl Rove "attack them on their strong points" political warfare. Instead of attacking an opponents' strong points, Trump goes for the "He did it too" attack and deflect approach.
 
Or both.

Toad is incapable of thinking strategically. It's all reactionary blustering to protect his fragile ego. There is no plan, there has never been a plan.
 
I do find it amusing watching his lawyers lose their careers though.
 
TX-Beau said:
I wonder who Mark knifed in the back. I hope it's Toad, but maybe not.
Click to expand...
He won't have anything in Trump's own hand or on a recording. That's the problem.

And the key conversations he had with Trump likely had no witnesses.
 
TX-Beau said:
Don't worry, nobody wants to see it anyway. I no longer even listen to anything the Toad vomits up.
Click to expand...
The ad was from his campaign. Trump's only comment was endorsing the ad. It's doubtful that he had any input into it. The entire ad, in my opinion, is to divert Trump's supporters' attention away from his own 'money-grubbing corruption' as he fleeces more money out of their pockets and into his.
 
gsdx said:
The ad was from his campaign. Trump's only comment was endorsing the ad. It's doubtful that he had any input into it. The entire ad, in my opinion, is to divert Trump's supporters' attention away from his own 'money-grubbing corruption' as he fleeces more money out of their pockets and into his.
Click to expand...
Six of one, half dozen of the other. It's possible to predict exactly what they are going to say on any given topic. It's always the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top