What's Twitter?
I'm not sure but I read somewhere that it used to give The Donald orgasms.
To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
What's Twitter?
Same here.Cormac135 said:Don't use it, don't care.
Don't use it, don't care.
Who’s acting hysterical? All I’ve seen anyone say in this thread is “Who Cares?”
Typically short-sighted response. I don't use it either but there are implications beyond our personal social media habits.
You're talking about a man who named his son 'X Æ A-12 Musk'.
What is your point? One is a dumbass attention driven decision. The other is a business decision. Unless you think he paid 44 billion with the intention of losing it all he will make little to no real changes.
Right. Does anyone even use twitter anymore besides old celebrities?
Musk agreed to pay $44 billion for the social media site, partly funded by a $12.5 billion loan secured against his own stake in Tesla. He has secured $13 billion in other loans from Wall Street lenders, but Tesla stock has tumbled with fears he may have to sell further stock in order to make up the $18.5 billion shortfall. He has not yet commented on how he will pay this portion of the price.
THERE IS NO BUSINESS CASE.
This is a mentally ill, drug addled sociopath who could burn through 44 billion for a punch-line to the joke of his life and not notice.
He is already running into trouble under the Agreement to Purchase, so I suspect this was just one of those things that in a manic phase he was determined to do and found everyone eventually ready to cash in knowing he would destroy it.
Got it.
But now it will be controlled by One Person.
The companies you cite are not private. They are public. And are susceptible to shareholder direction.
Elon Musk won't be.
As I've noted he is already running afoul of the terms of the purchase agreement and is being cautioned by the EU and countries with hate speech laws.
This is a cannabis fueled fever dream that is going to cost his TESLA shareholders billions.
Time to get him sectioned.
[Quoted Post: Removed]
Paradox of tolerance
if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant...in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must retain the right to be intolerant of intolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
Ok people. Do you really want Elon Musk to turn Twitter into an uncontrolled, free-speech free-for-all with zero moderation and no rules?
It's just going to be one massive neo-Nazi fascist hate-fest; Twitter Der Stürmer.
The only thing remaining on Twitter is going to be:
1. Irrational conspiracy theories and frauds.
2. Mindless denial of facts and rejection of reality and science.
3. Bald-faced lies, disinformation, incoherent bad-faith rants, contempt for those unlike yourself.
4. Fascist, white-supremacist, and theocratic bigotry, along with every ism and phobia known to humanity.
5. Seditious, insurrectionist, anti-government militias, and Nazi hate groups spewing propaganda to deceive victims into joining their traitorous movements.
6. Foreign goverments sowing lies to tear apart the fabric and foundations of the United States.
This is what Twitter was becoming before it was somewhat controlled, and that's what it will be again, and that's why taking off the controls is so dangerous, and that's why I care even though I do not have a Twitter ID.
That is not "free speech". It is predatory, rapacious, destructive hate. And I am stunned that some can't or won't recognize the existential threat to safety and security that opening up this venue potentially poses. A truly free society cannot have unlimited tolerance for intolerance. You have to draw a line or be destroyed.
It is happening right in front of our eyes. Democracy vs. Fascism? Freedom vs. Autocracy?
This. Is. Not. A. Drill.
What you are calling for is censorship of people you don't agree with and for things that could happen or already are happening. In what world is that free speech?
