- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 122,824
- Reaction score
- 4,067
- Points
- 113
I don't find that very clear. It's not apparent that actions are intended specifically as opposed to orientation, or whatever anything "else" might refer to. Qualified scholars have suggested other interpretations. Some have suggested the prohibition is significant only as identifying Hebrew culture...others that the prohibition was done away with via JC...others that the passage merely seeks to include same-sex relationships under the same principles of virtue that apply to different-sex relationships...others that the intention is not to distinguish same-sex love, but same-sex abuse.
What a shame.
Where is "orientation" mentioned? There's nothing even mentioned but actions. It doesn't talk about love, either; it gives no indication that love is relevant. No "competent scholar" will say anything else, because that's what the words mean -- your explication of "other interpretations" aren't even relevant to what the words mean, because they're obviously dragging in stuff from outside -- which no competent scholar does. In fact a competent scholar would point out that the verse itself says it's talking about an act, in the case of the second passage.
Whether or not the prohibition applied to anyone besides the Hebrews, or for that matter to anyone but priests, or whether Jesus did away with it, are not relevant to what the words mean. Before those considerations even become relevant, first the words have to be read for themselves.
[Text: Removed]


















