- Joined
- Dec 25, 2005
- Posts
- 22,238
- Reaction score
- 120
- Points
- 63
[never mind...post reconsidered]
PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
it's very easy to use science to back up a certain viewpoint nowadays but the truth of the matter is that in order to be able to raise a child, you have to be able to have the power to discipline them and to be able to guide them. sometimes, discipline comes through the use of fear by showing a consequence behind an action to get a kid not to do it.
plenty of people i know caught asswhippings and came out to be productive citizens compared to some people outthere that are locked up and the whole nine because their parents were scared to discipline them.
how so?
You can establish authority without the whip. Or without even threatening the whip.
Lex
I don't know; it seems that disrespect is up even as less corporal punishment is used. Seems pretty basic cause and effect to me...confusing cause and effect
I'd say it's denouncing yet another paper that looks at a specific punishment without looking at other punishments and the damage they may cause. We already know that words can do their own damage, and in fact can do a lot more damage to a kid than physical abuse. That's also ignoring humiliation and other forms of punishment that can easily lead to the CPS being called.Denouncing scientific research just because it contradicts our culture
The problem is that that could be said of any punishment, as most punishment relies on some degree of fear. And I personally debate the efficacy of time-outs, but that's because I see anything that gives a kid a chance to nurse a grudge rather than actually think about the negative ramifications of his own actions as bad...The obvious common sense behind raising a child in fear of violence doesnt even SOUND healthy
Care to use actual facts at some point? Or are you trying to drive home the point that verbal abuse is also possible?You suck at life and debate.
You'll always have poverty, crime, and dropping out of school. However, violent crime and teen pregnancy are down.In my culture violent discipline has been a staple for years. The results? Zero. Still teen pregnancy, still high crime, still poverty and dropping out of school.
Pardon my editing your full post, but these have meaning for me.And I would have to figure that with corporal abuse, a parent can raise a child to flinch - a lot - physically, mentally and emotionally.
Its amazing how many people are diagnosed with depression and anxiety. While not all were savagely beaten as children, often they cite some sort of "abuse" in their early years as being a root cause (at least as they can identify a root cause).
And again, why wouldn't being physically beaten by one's own parent/s cause a child to fall into depression, suffer anxiety and perhaps become completely untrusting of authority figures and those in positions of trust.
Read my post again.And for the last part, so people from your generation who were beat don't murder?
Nearly all the children of those generations were spanked/hit or whatnot and they turned out fine for the most part as well.
Yep, my dad's whipping's turned him into a fine child abuser himself![]()
And like I said earlier, there are also studies that show spanking is beneficial. One study does not equate to proof.I don't know why people are trying to debunk the research as a whole. The research is there and it's true. The research isn't saying that spanking will cause one to develop mental disorders, but it just increases the risk. With that, just because people here have been spanked or whipped and turned out fine doesn't mean they didn't have an increased risk.
It's important to know the difference between causation and association. You can't dismiss the research just because it didn't apply to you and/or a few others you know.
I don't need to.
I agree. And that's all I have left to say.And that's why this "debate" is at a stalemate
*Sigh* You said:No I didn't.
And for the last part, so people from your generation who were beat don't murder? They don't rape? Steal? Cause violence to other people?
I did not say my generation, I said "those generations" implying previous generations - on whom the full effect of spanking can be witnessed because we are able to analyze it's effect over the course of their entire lifetime, the same cannot be said of my generation most of whom are barely adults. Misinterpretation number one. Also I made a point of saying "nearly" and "for the most part" because I am well aware that nothing applies to every person on the planet, especially murder and rape which only a very small amount of the population do and I made sure of acknowledging that. Misinterpretation number two.Nearly all the children of those generations were spanked/hit or whatnot and they turned out fine for the most part as well.
I never claimed spanking works, I just said I was spanked and am not mentally ill. And also, the fallacy of research is exactly the reason why I can call bullshit on a study especially when I find another study that perfectly contradicts this one. And while my personal experience is a factor in my belief, so are the personal experiences of others I have encountered as well as other studies I have read. How is that any different than you, especially with the mention of the effect spanking had on people you know?You can't call the research bullshit and claim that something like this works for the most part. While also pointing out the possible fallacy of "research" and/or "study". So you think it's bullshit based on your personal experience. You're looking at it black and white.
But I have to say that whether spanking actually "works" I don't totally agree with it but I won't tell people what to do with their kids. I don't think it's going to work with every kid, one kid might be ok with it another kid might not like being hit at all. And I think when inanimate objects are involved, that goes beyond "discipline". Cause the only reason to grab something like a belt or something would be to cause more pain and that's stepping out of the realm of discipline.
But it is a matter of fact (at least in the context of my posts). The majority of people from previous generations are not mentally ill (of course, I'm not including things like Alzheimers or Dementia which are common with age), nor are they rapists or murderers or thieves despite the fact that they lived in a time when going to even more extremes than spanking was a common practice while discipling ones child. That was the point I was trying to make. If you need a study to tell you that most people's parents and grandparents aren't murderers and rapists, I honestly don't have a response. And you were partially correct in your assumption, but what you did misconstrue may be my own fault. I do not completely disregard the correlation and evidence the OP's study presents, however, I do disregard the notion that this study by some means proves that spanking is detrimental to the health of all children...came off a bit of "matter of fact" when you pretty much disregarded studies. And if you didn't it mean it that way, again I apologize.
I can see your point and agree with most of it. I too believe spanking should not be an initial response to misbehavior but I was also one of those children from whom no other form of discipline or behavior modification (including therapy) worked besides spanking. So I simply cannot agree with those who say spanking is unacceptable under any circumstance.But I have to say that whether spanking actually "works" I don't totally agree with it but I won't tell people what to do with their kids. I don't think it's going to work with every kid, one kid might be ok with it another kid might not like being hit at all. And I think when inanimate objects are involved, that goes beyond "discipline". Cause the only reason to grab something like a belt or something would be to cause more pain and that's stepping out of the realm of discipline.
Hear, hear.Guys, there's a difference between a whipping and a beating. We knew it then, and I understand it now.
And that's why this "debate" is at a stalemate. And that's why I said it's not completely bullshit. Sometimes it is bullshit, other times it's not. Children react differently to different form of punishment. I got yelled at, I turned out fine. Some people get whipped, they turn out fine. Everyone has different thresholds.
But I don't believe that parents should start out spanking their children as a form of discipline. Inflicting fear and pain should be the "last resort" if the parents resort to it at all. And if they're still misbehaving, perhaps they should see a psychiatrist.
Here ya go.I'd like to see the research that is FOR spanking please.
