The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

What is new on the Gay Marriage front?

This vote is going to be a nail biter,no doubt about it. Hopefully others won't wimp out like Carroll did.
 
^ It's because of those "conservatives," Sausy is the only one that celebrates in good news posts of marriage equality and LGBT civil rights. The others are *always* silent, if not critical of such progress towards equality. Which is why their motives for being a part of this community are suspect.

this.
 
^ It's because of those "conservatives," Sausy is the only one that celebrates in good news posts of marriage equality and LGBT civil rights. The others are *always* silent, if not critical of such progress towards equality. Which is why their motives for being a part of this community are suspect.

Allowing marriage among two people who love one another would, I think, be a conservative value.

Faux conservatives scream about the "sanctity of marriage" but it's entirely OK for a former Georgia congresscritter to divorce his bedridden wife in her hospital bed, suffering for cancer, while he goes off and robs the cradle. It's also OK for Britney Spears to be married for a fraction of a week.

Allowing only some to experience the "sanctity of marriage" while arbitrarily disallowing others, is not conservative. No different than the laws a couple generations ago which didn't allow anything but couples from the same "race."

There is no bull's rush, anytime soon, to start allowing polygamy, or marriage to close relatives, or letting me marry my refrigerator (or a cat, if I chose to get one). Of course marriage to relatives has been proven, for a long time, to tend to cause gene-pool issues.

I'm not convinced that polygamy is harmful, except that the genders are more-or-less balanced in this country (something like 48% men, 52% women? - less a small number with gender ambiguity) and, as polygamy is almost always a guy marrying multiple women, the available pool could go out of balance.

There is no rush to allow people to marry inanimate, or non-human, objects.

Though I am a screaming diehard liberal - which includes a number of "universal" viewpoints which SHOULD NOT be considered to be conservative/liberal at all - Sausy knows well that I fully respect his viewpoints, because his views are backed with his own thoughts and decisions, not merely parroted because a blogger, an organization or entity (Tea Party, a union, Fox News or MSNBC, etc.), a politician (even Chris Christie) believes it. (*8*)
 
This morning in the Hawaii House:

The second reading on the bill is delayed.

The Hawaii House of Representatives gaveled into session a little after 10 a.m. Wednesday for the second reading and vote on an amended version of SB 1, the "Hawaii Marriage Equality Act of 2013", which advanced out of the Judiciary & Finance committees 18-12 Tuesday night.

After an invocation and brief introductions, lawmakers immediately recessed. Vice Speaker John Mizuno indicated Representatives would reconvene at 11 a.m., but nearly an hour has come and gone since then with no indication of when legislators will return to the floor. Republican Minority caucus member, Representative Bob McDermott, who is a staunch opponent of SB 1, says the delay is a result of in-fighting between Democratic Majority caucus members. McDermott says a few Representatives reportedly want a roll-call vote on the floor for a proposal to introduce a Constitutional Amendment to let the people vote on same-sex marriage, but not everyone agrees.

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/...-sex-marriage-bill-advances-to-floor-for-vote
 
Of course, in politics nowadays, there is almost NO such thing as a "universal" value. IF OBAMA LIKES IT, IT IS BAD. (so say Republicans sitting in Washington.) So many Supreme Court decisions are 5-4. Washington votes such as 424-11/96-4, or 8-1/9-0 Supreme Court decisions should be - if not the rule - at least common. But this stuff rarely happens at all.
 
It si getting ugly at the capitol building in Hawaii. Gay Marriage supporters are now being rushed and drowned out by "loving" Christians.
 
It si getting ugly at the capitol building in Hawaii. Gay Marriage supporters are now being rushed and drowned out by "loving" Christians.

The Civil Unions battle in Vermont thirteen years ago was worse.

This is the last statute that will ever legalize same sex marriage and the fundies may be cognizant if that.
 
Illinois means that 30% of US states now have marriage equality.

But, because those states with marriage equality tend to be populous, I have made a rough calculation that 37% of the American population now has access to gay marriage. (If Hawaii becomes the 16th state soon, it will be 37.6% of the population).



I doubt it matters much population wise, but don’t forget that at least two Indian tribes in Oregon have equal marriage for their people.


I suppose it may not matter much since I doubt the Feds recognize it.
 
I doubt it matters much population wise, but don’t forget that at least two Indian tribes in Oregon have equal marriage for their people.


I suppose it may not matter much since I doubt the Feds recognize it.

They should go radical, and offer a blood ceremony for any gays who want to join so they can get married.
 
Despite being pioneers in gay sexual activity reaching back some thousands of years, Greece has fallen well behind on the legalisation of gay partnerships...nevertheless, The European Court has just given our judiciary a kick in the pants with the hope that the Greek Government may take note by introducing parliamentary legislation to legalise partnerships for gay loving couples:

http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite1_1_07/11/2013_526716

I quote:

Greece wrong to exclude same-sex couples from 'civil unions,' European Court of Human Rights rules
 
One final floor vote so expect some antics but I expect the vote tally we saw for the second reading will be the final tally. A majority no vote yesterday and the bill would have been dead.
Number 16 is on its way folks.
 
'
Governor Quinn will sign the Marriage Equality Bill in Chicago* on November 20. Congratulations to Illinois! :=D:



To the other 35 states: persistence works!

*University of Illinois
 
Heard news today that four couples in Idaho are suing the state in federal court for the current laws on the books against marriage equality.

Is this how it's going to have to be to get all the red states on board?
 
I suspect that is how it will be. I am in a red state and the majority are unshakable in their ignorance.
 
Heard news today that four couples in Idaho are suing the state in federal court for the current laws on the books against marriage equality.

Is this how it's going to have to be to get all the red states on board?

Yeah the 9th circuit is already briefing Sevcik, so the Idaho case might not even reach trial.
 
Alright folks, Hawaii's in the bag. The House just voted 30-19 on passage, and confirmation in the Senate will be a formality.

This was the final statute in the marriage equality agenda. It was a circus to watch, with some of the worst testimony I've ever heard in years of following this debate, including from a member of our own community.
 
Back
Top