The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

What's happening in England

Bacari Ogarro AKA ‘Secret Mizzy’ of Dalston was a media star on TikTok, YouTube and Instagram, where he has 79,000 followers.


That naughty rascal has had his wrist well and truly slapped.


Lee Sergent, in mitigation, said O'Garro had apologised to the family. He said his client was raised by a single parent and had a difficult upbringing. "He is an intelligent young man and a young man with some potential" Mr Sergent told the court.

He may yet achieve great things, who knows? Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Matthew 7:1-2

He's pushing the limits, and he'll find them when he threatens the wrong person and gets the holy shit beat out of him. The beater will go to jail for assault, but the whole bad boy prank edge will be instantly taken off, as he won't be so brave any more.

Unless of course he accidentally calls one of his victims by the wrong pronoun, in which case he'll be the one who gets locked up.
 
^
A star is born, courtesy of Piers Morgan. Note the plug for his (Mizzy's) new channel at 10:20.


I'd like to see a vigilante group comprising a selection of his past "marks" get their revenge with knobs on and post it on twitter or wherever. I'm prejudiced because I have a strong distaste for practical jokes on any level.
 
The teenage felon living on Government benefits says "UK laws are weak, simple as".
 
This 'winner' has turned into a victim.

They claim 'genocide' has been committed on them.

They claim their suffering is equal to those suffering on the slave-ships to Rawanda! They're threatening to leave 'this terrible island' called Britain.

 
This 'winner' has turned into a victim.

They claim 'genocide' has been committed on them.

They claim their suffering is equal to those suffering on the slave-ships to Rawanda! They're threatening to leave 'this terrible island' called Britain.

On a point of pedantry, there will be no slave ships to Rwanda because (a) the people it's proposed to send there claim to be asylum seekers rather than slaves and (b) Rwanda is landlocked.

Emily Bridges was previously male and the argument is that she retains some sort of physical advantage from that which female athletes who have always been female do not possess. That sounds to me like a perfectly reasonable conclusion. The wokerati are predictably up in arms about it. The ordinary person in the street couldn't give a toss.
 
I loathe the BBC and what it has become this century. Yet I love their 1932 building with its majestic curving facade of Portland stone standing over Portland Street.

I love the work of the late Eric Gill and his typefaces, Perpetua and Gill Sans, and his William Blake-like statues.

So I regret this modern, misguided numpty who thinks he can take a pick-axe every year in order to right the alleged misdeeds committed in another century.


 
Some students at Oxford are protesting about Professor Kathleen Stock, who has been invited to speak at the University. As far as I can tell, the professor does not believe that people who are MTF transgender are real women and should be allowed to use women-only spaces. Even the Prime Minister has weighed in with his views about free speech.

 
Professor Kathleen Stock
She says the Oxford students are 'a bunch of neurotic, self-absorbed youngsters' who think they're the masters of the universe'.

They have 'interesting hair' and are desperate for her to appear as 'the villain to legitimise their sense of victimhood'.

 
Another TERF talking down to Oxford undergrads.

That should gain her a lot of support and credibility. She sounds no different than those who railed about Gen Z, Gen X and back in the 70's, the radical hippies all with their interesting hair.

She isn't being suppressed or cancelled.

Just trying to be the victim in her own social justice war.
 
In the Middle Ages students at Oxford and Cambridge did not sit written exams but were assessed on their skill in composing formal texts such as sermons, and in debating or extempore speaking. They had to demonstrate not only a thorough knowledge of the subject but also a mastery of rhetoric, and they were expected to mount a structured argument on both sides of a question equally convincingly. They probably had to do it in Latin, but that would have been a walk in the park because they'd had Latin grammar beaten into them as kids.

That was then. This is now.

20230530_164618.gif
 
I suppose you might think so given the opinions of some.

Certainly that doesn't reflect the young people that I know who are studying at Oxford.

Vis a vis the emphasis on oration and argument in medieval times:

Before reforms in the early 19th century, the curriculum at Oxford was notoriously narrow and impractical. Sir Spencer Walpole, a historian of contemporary Britain and a senior government official, had not attended any university. He said, "Few medical men, few solicitors, few persons intended for commerce or trade, ever dreamed of passing through a university career." He quoted the Oxford University Commissioners in 1852 stating: The education imparted at Oxford was not such as to conduce to the advancement in life of many persons, except those intended for the ministry."



And of course, as we know, the early students at Oxford were so wild and unruly as to be banned from the Town and some had to flee to Cambridge.


I would posit that the debate between Kathleen Stock and the students in opposition to her being platformed at Oxford is as healthy an argument as if she actually spoke there.

But it isn't as though she is a great academic being denied a voice. She obviously couldn't even rise above the debate, but instead descended to insults.

I suspect that she is lashing out and accusing others in an emotional pique unworthy of a real scholar of accusing others of that which she herself and the other TERFs are guilty of: being neurotic and utterly and entirely self absorbed, a victim of her own superiority complex.

Poor miss.
 
Back
Top