I was starting to like you until stopped at greed. So rob the rich of their hard earned money that they got just out of the desire to let their children grow up reasonably well.
I do not believe you are at all a Libertarian.
Please explain this "Constitutional Monarchical Libertarianism" and in the basic sense what this means.
Hard earned money"?
Wow, are you naive! The entire financial system is rigged to funnel money from the poor to the rich, without any effort on the part of the rich at all. Of course a great deal of civil law is designed to punish the poor for being poor, too.
Of all the rich people I've met, only a handful had "worked hard" for their wealth. Every one of them gave away a fifth or more of their income to people in need -- rarely as money, though, but as things people needed (like the one who, at a PTA meeting for the local church school, realized what a constant effort it was for the poorer people to work out rides for the kids, so he (1) wrote a check to the school for two large vans, (2) established a modest endowment to pay for insurance for those vans, and (3) learned from the pastor and school administration just how many families would still be struggling, with which information he went down to some car dealerships and set up a system for those folks to get cars free [without them ever knowing who did it]... with the warning that if there was any problem with any of those cars, he'd make a problem for the one who sold it [unintended consequence: not knowing which cars the families were going to choose, they overhauled every used car that could possibly qualify]) (or like the doctor who bought himself, his wife, and his secretary new vans every year, and sometimes more than once a year, because a local private school had a rule that they would not accept donations of new merchandise over some amount in cost -- and his one requirement for the school was that when they switched an old van for a "not new" one he was providing, they take it to a certain garage and have it thoroughly checked out and overhauled, and then give it to a needy family in the neighborhood).
Now, just where did I propose robbing anyone of anything? Didn't happen.
Oh -- are you objecting that I called people screaming for government money greedy? Often they are.
I suspect that by the time they die, those rich people's kids will already be doing quite well. And if they aren't, a bequest of 1/2($1 million)(minimum wage) ought to take care of that (if it can't, they're miserably incompetent anyway, and should give their money to someone who can be creative with it).
Am I a Libertarian? More than any on this board, and more than most I've met in real life... enough that I get called a liberal by the reactionaries here (the actual conservatives seem to be able to tell the difference) and a conservative by unthinking liberals.
Most self-named libertarians aren't at all -- they're closet anarchists. Case in point: dismantling the federal government -- do it overnight, as most self-proclaimed libertarians drool about, and you don't enhance liberty, you get anarchy.
Others are just liars. Example: the Koch Brothers. Looking at where they donate their "libertarian" money shows a pattern aiming at plutocracy.
And speaking of plutocracy, and decent libertarian should oppose anything that trends in that direction: plutocracy inevitable becomes some form of feudalism, and feudalism is not good for liberty. Historically, intense concentration of wealth is bad for liberty; therefore, any libertarian with an IQ over 95 should see that the concentration of wealth is to be opposed.
That's long enough; I'll describe my constitutional monarchical libertarianism later.
