I admit in my previous participation in this thread I digressed into a different discussion than one which Krammer was actualling asking, so I'll try to get more back on topic with this post.
I don't think Krammer anywhere has ever given a reason for "why" straights hate gays. I don't think Krammer was even reallly asking "why do straights hate gays?" as much as stating the question as an assertion: "Straights hate gays!" Seldom is the intent of his editorials ever to offer an explanation as to make an assertion.
The intent and content of this, like most of his commentaries, seems much more of a rhetorical nature asking: "Why are you straight people out their who give lip service to supporting gays not more vociferous in your condemnation of anti-gay remarks, such as that of General Pace, and why do you other gay activists not call them on it more when they are only give lip service?"
PFLAG in the editorial Mattie posted had a valid point that there are straight people who are out-spoken and frequently, but I think Krammer is asking, why aren't there more straights like the membes of PFLAG who make a greater outcry?
Why do members of Congress and almost every other organization, for example, always and on all levels always wheigh in when someone makes a tactless and racist remark, while frequently or almost always allowing the waffaling that Barack and Hilary engaged in go by almost without comment by the same straight individuals or non-gay civil rights organizations?
I think Krammer's over simplified answer to that rhetorical question is always "because they hate us either in the open or under their breaths and just give lip sevice" when it's of a pandering nature to gain our votes. But he never really addresses, at least not in this commentary, which is basically just a condenced version of what he said in his last book The Tragedy of American Gays, the "why." He simply asserts their reasons for not speaking up is always because of an unqualified and without explanation, all encompassing "they hate us!"
Candidly, for a long time I've seen Larry Krammer as being in a constant state of "acting out" to vent his frustrations and anger rather than "Acting Up" and really contributing very little any more to the social discourse other than his outbursts of anger and his own bitterness and feelings of personal betrayal by people he thought were his allies.
I had a lot of respect for him in the past, and still do with regard to his non-fiction works, but when it comes to his more recent commentaries and outburts that respect has begun to decrease on my part over the years.