The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoPLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Why does life always takes away the things we like the most?
- Thread starter rodvill
- Start date
PhunkSpunk
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Posts
- 8,560
- Reaction score
- 158
- Points
- 0
My problem with circumcision is and always will be that the procedure is performed on infants who have no say in the matter. That strikes me as a profound violation of personhood.
During my pediatrics rotation our preceptor tried to convince us that it was painless, and I didn't see a single little guy who wasn't wailing his head off. All the glucose solution in the world didn't keep them quiet. In short, it's a hell of a thing to have done to you on your second or third day of life.
The foreskin is there for a reason: it protects an extremely sensitive part of a man. If it was useless evolution would have taken care of it ages ago.
During my pediatrics rotation our preceptor tried to convince us that it was painless, and I didn't see a single little guy who wasn't wailing his head off. All the glucose solution in the world didn't keep them quiet. In short, it's a hell of a thing to have done to you on your second or third day of life.
The foreskin is there for a reason: it protects an extremely sensitive part of a man. If it was useless evolution would have taken care of it ages ago.
I share your philosophy, and it is something atrocious to do to a little human being, but speaking about aesthetics, i've seen that in general, circumcisions done at birth have better outcomes and look more pleasant that those performed in adulthood.
So that is why in my personal opinion, it is better to either be cut at birth or be uncut forever. (I was circumcised because of phymosis, so it was not optional).
So that is why in my personal opinion, it is better to either be cut at birth or be uncut forever. (I was circumcised because of phymosis, so it was not optional).
I have watched three live circumcisions of newborns and in none of them have I witnessed much of any reaction of pain by the babies. One was a mere, single whimper. Another was a couple of faint cries, then stopped. One cried a bit louder but was very quickly calmed. I saw nothing that could be identified as even slightly traumatic.
When in the Army, an 18 y/o boy in my barracks voluntarily was circumcised. It was done as an out patient surgery. He was back in the barracks late that afternoon. It was done with a local and he said he hardly felt anything. But, later that night, and the next day or so, he was pretty sore but tolerable.
Us nasties in the barracks brought him lots of porn mags. Bad us.
After he had healed, he was quite happy that he had done it and would recommend it to others should their need arise. He had no problem adjusting to resuming sex, including masturbation, which he claimed became even more sensitive and pleasant. He also mentioned that he enjoyed the benefits of improved, easier hygiene.
I, however, have also read of botched circs. I would think there is no excuse for that.
When in the Army, an 18 y/o boy in my barracks voluntarily was circumcised. It was done as an out patient surgery. He was back in the barracks late that afternoon. It was done with a local and he said he hardly felt anything. But, later that night, and the next day or so, he was pretty sore but tolerable.
Us nasties in the barracks brought him lots of porn mags. Bad us.
After he had healed, he was quite happy that he had done it and would recommend it to others should their need arise. He had no problem adjusting to resuming sex, including masturbation, which he claimed became even more sensitive and pleasant. He also mentioned that he enjoyed the benefits of improved, easier hygiene.
I, however, have also read of botched circs. I would think there is no excuse for that.
ChickenGuy
Likes cock.
I will just give once more my own personal case once again, which is that I have phimosis, I still have it, the urologist wasn't worried about it, I wasn't ordered or pressured to have surgery done, my relative who saw children with this condition said to me it wasn't important, I've never had any pain or problems in all my life with it, and I'm increasingly finding this American obsession with equating phimosis almost like some sort of life-threatening emergency to be ridiculously stupid, and driven by the American health corporations who have a vested interest in putting men under the knife for a quick profit.
Enough of the hysteria and mania about this condition. If you're not experiencing pain or discomfort or any issues with it, then just forget about it, ignore it, and get on with your life. That's what I did.
Enough of the hysteria and mania about this condition. If you're not experiencing pain or discomfort or any issues with it, then just forget about it, ignore it, and get on with your life. That's what I did.
