Fucking win.




As for the question, no one is needed. I notice one of the comments below say that it is easier to be against someone than be for someone, but that's not the case with the so-called "Obama doctrine" now is it? Obama proved that he is for self-determination when he joined with the international movement against Gaddafi, and even then it wasn't a clarion call. His pragmatic approach doesn't allow for bogeymen, which is why the US didn't have any of the sort with Clinton, the previous pragmatic president.
I know this is a broken-record, but this one isn't all about condemnation--- the Boomers grew up with an America with a simplified mission, either the stories of bravery regarding the Nazis to what they lived as the Cold War. It is pretty difficult for a generation raised on the simplicity of such a stark contrast as black-and-white to appreciate the richness of color that is reality. *shrug* And seeing as how the War on Terror fails to live up to that Cold War dichotomy, I don't think that myopic worldview will persist, especially since not all of the Boomer generation bought into it, to subsequent generations.