The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Climate Science biting liberals in the ass again.

Red, white and blue.

I'm amazed no one decided to be the white party.

Are there any green parties?
 
opinterph said:
Do we know the name of that individual?
Click to expand...

I do not. My point is that his excuse would not necessarily be the truth. If he in part wanted to avoid the liberal-- communist association, he probably would not admit it, but give some other reason. Giving the communist association reason would make the very association he wanted to avoid.
 
Benvolio said:
I do not. My point is that his excuse would not necessarily be the truth. If he in part wanted to avoid the liberal-- communist association, he probably would not admit it, but give some other reason. Giving the communist association reason would make the very association he wanted to avoid.
Click to expand...

Meh. Only hard right people give any thought to red=communist now.
Communism is dead. Has been for decades.

Social democracy is what democrat voters actually want.

There's no confusion, apart from those who want to demonize ideas they disagree with by using dated cold war terminology.
 
Benvolio said:
I do not. My point is that his excuse would not necessarily be the truth. If he in part wanted to avoid the liberal-- communist association, he probably would not admit it, but give some other reason. Giving the communist association reason would make the very association he wanted to avoid.
Click to expand...

:rotflmao:

It must be quite exciting, when you see conspiracies under every stone.
 
Benvolio said:
I do not. My point is that his excuse would not necessarily be the truth. If he in part wanted to avoid the liberal-- communist association, he probably would not admit it, but give some other reason. Giving the communist association reason would make the very association he wanted to avoid.
Click to expand...

The fact that you equate socialism and communism already undermines any honest discussion of the values of liberal/progressive voters.
 
xbuzzerx said:
The fact that you equate socialism and communism already undermines any honest discussion of the values of liberal/progressive voters.
Click to expand...

Took you three years to figure that out?

- - - Updated - - -

LIBURULS IS WICKED!

donchaknow...
 
xbuzzerx said:
Taking all the money to give to mud people invaders and forcing white people to stand in bread lines...
Click to expand...

...while aborting white their babies so 'mexcans can have their votes...
 
Alnitak said:
The World Bank Group places the United States within the top seven countries in Ease of Doing Business, slipping from third place in 2006. If it were not for the corporate tax rate it very well may be number one. So clearly there are other sets of laws, or lack thereof, that make business very easy to conduct here. I doubt that corporations will relocate entirely based on one factor alone, as there are only six countries (just one of them English speaking) where business is easier to conduct.
Click to expand...

IIRC one of the reasons we're down the list that far is the multiple levels of government bureaucracy to be dealt with. Just as an example, when the guy behind "anything to oil" technology wanted to build a second plant in the U.S., and found a place, that spot had to get approval from multiple municipal, county, state, and federal agencies, each with their own requirements -- whereas in France, there was just one approval from one agency. As a result, getting permission to start a plant in France cost something like one-twentieth of what it cost in the U.S. So there's still just one such plant in the U.S. while new ones are being built in France. And things are murky enough in the U.S. that companies have gotten all the way through the process and started building, or even begun operations, only to have another agency decide they have jurisdiction and show up to shut everything down.
 
xbuzzerx said:
Neither party supports libertarianism.

Democrats support spending money on the society as a whole. Republicans support retaining as much of it as humanly possible in the hands of elites, bankers, corporate entities and the non-working investor class. And have entrenched habits of abusing, as far as possible, subsidies, bankruptcy laws, diluted liabilities, tax-paid resources (infrastructure, welfare, food stamps to evade proper pay) and of course, bailouts.

Republicans are just as for so-called "redistribution of wealth." They just support distributing as much of it as possible to the people who need it the least.
Click to expand...

In essence, Republicans think Social Darwinism is great. They're in love with the heartless economic jungle, so much that they want to help the "winners" along and push the losers to die off faster.
Of course they don't see it that, way, but that's the effect of their programs -- and as Jesus noted, it's by their fruit that we know them.
 
Hey, let's bring back acid rain. Let's bring back DDT. Let's bring back chlorofluorocarbons too. We can bring back leaded gasoline and lead paint. Hell, let's bring back asbestos. Why not dump raw sewage into the rivers? There should be no limit on what corporations can dump in rivers. Why even have superfund sites? No need to clean that shit up.

They're all a liberal plot to destroy businesses. Because we all know that man has absolutely no impact on the environment.
 
Kulindahr said:
So you admit that your approach to these things is to abjure research and make shit up.
Click to expand...

For shame, you are taking a sentence out of context. I was specifically referring to the obscure history of the designation of Republican states as red.
 
Kulindahr said:
In essence, Republicans think Social Darwinism is great. They're in love with the heartless economic jungle, so much that they want to help the "winners" along and push the losers to die off faster.
Of course they don't see it that, way, but that's the effect of their programs -- and as Jesus noted, it's by their fruit that we know them.
Click to expand...
False. I defy you to show me a Republican argument for Social Darwinism ever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top