The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Comey Fired - We've Seen this all Before

You recall during the election that he joked he wished the Russians would let us know what was in the emails in Clintons non protected server. They had been vulnerable to hackers like Russia, but they were being denied to Congress. Trump would never have made such as joke or any similar reference if his campaign had any contact the Russians about democrat emails. He knows there is nothing to the claim and is frustrated that the democrats are keeping the focus on it. Then Comey wanted a big budget from Congress to investigate endlessly for years as the FBI is wont.
 
He wasn't joking.



And his call to the Russians is being taken very seriously by the FBI...to the point of them withholding any information about it because it is relevant to their investigations.

Flynn, Manafort, Carter Paige and Roger Stone all have too many dealings with TrumpCo.'s campaign and the Russians. The dirt is all there. And he either knew all about it or his fingerprints are likely to be found all over it.

Maybe once Flynn is looking at charges of lying to the FBI and conspiracy...he'll start to sing like a canary.
 
The 'right' hand apparently doesn't know what the left hand is doing. The acting FBI director contradicts Trump:

The acting director of the FBI said that ousted Director James Comey enjoyed widespread support among the bureau’s rank-and-file members — directly contradicting a White House claim to justify his firing.

When asked about the Trump administration’s assertion that Comey had lost the confidence of FBI staff, Andrew McCabe said, “No, sir, that is not accurate.”

McCabe, who has worked for the FBI for 21 years, has been serving as its acting director since President Trump abruptly fired Comey on Tuesday evening.
Click to expand...

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/acting-fb...m-comeys-support-within-bureau-171528015.html

EDIT: By the way, Trump has publicly called Comey a "showboat" and a "grandstander".

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/trumps-la...de-decision-fbi-chief-showboat-183319125.html

Oh, the delicious irony.
 
Are any of the Trump news shocking to you ?
No, its interesting but not shocking, thats the problem.

Unless he eats human meat, thats shocking but he will not be the first to eat human :lol:
 
rareboy said:
He wasn't joking.



And his call to the Russians is being taken very seriously by the FBI...to the point of them withholding any information about it because it is relevant to their investigations.

Flynn, Manafort, Carter Paige and Roger Stone all have too many dealings with TrumpCo.'s campaign and the Russians. The dirt is all there. And he either knew all about it or his fingerprints are likely to be found all over it.

Maybe once Flynn is looking at charges of lying to the FBI and conspiracy...he'll start to sing like a canary.
Click to expand...

Trump was joking but the real point is he would not have said it if he were actually colluding with the Russians or getting Clinton emails from them. Nor would he have fired the his own chief negotiator of the Russian accusation if he thought there was anything to it.
 
Benvolio said:
Trump was joking but the real point is he would not have said it if he were actually colluding with the Russians or getting Clinton emails from them. Nor would he have fired the his own chief negotiator of the Russian accusation if he thought there was anything to it.
Click to expand...

And how do you know this? The man hasn't done anything logical in over 4 months.
 
I'm thinking the entire Trump presidency is just going to be one gigantic cluster-fuck. It's like watching a keystone cops film. When the official White House spokesman, Spicer or Huckabee, states something important, you can bet the farm that it isn't true. Indeed, just like the President's NBC interview today, he himself, will spill the beans on how much a lie the earlier statements are, except Trump being Trump, he will insist that his statements now in no way conflict with his earlier statements. At the end of his presidency for example, he will boast of his having built a wall across our southern boarder, despite the obvious absence of one. :roll:
 
Trump's opinion on Comey's handling of the Clinton investigation:

In October 2016
"That was so bad what happened originally, and it took guts for Director Comey to make the move that he made in light of the kind of opposition he had where they’re trying to protect her from criminal prosecution,"
Click to expand...

In May 2017:
I have received the attached letters the Attorney General Deputy Attorney General Of the United States recommending your dismissal as the Director of' the Federal Bureau Investigation. I have accepted their recommendation and you are hereby terminated and removed office, effective immediately.

While I greatly appreciate you informing on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation, I nevertheless concur with the judgment of' the Department Of Justice that you are not able to effectively lead the Bureau.

It is essential that find new leadership for the FBI that restores public trust and confidence in its vital law enforcement mission.
Click to expand...

The mentioned letters spelling out the reasoning for terminating Comey being the exact things that are bring praised in the first quote.

But it is the first line of that middle paragraph that gets me, why is it even there if the investigation has nothing to do with the reasons he is being fired?
 
Stardreamer said:
This fixation on whether Trump himself is being investigated is telling. In actuality if Comey did say something like that it would be correct, Trump himself is not being investigated it is his campaign and campaign staffers that are being investigated.
Click to expand...
In firing Comey, Trump anticipated that the democrats would accuse him of firing Comey because he, Trump, was being investigated. Trump forclosed that possibility by getting repeated assurances that he was not being investigated.
 
Benvolio said:
In firing Comey, Trump anticipated that the democrats would accuse him of firing Comey because he, Trump, was being investigated. Trump forclosed that possibility by getting repeated assurances that he was not being investigated.
Click to expand...

By commenting on it in the termination letter? If that is Trump's logic he failed, it only raises the likelyhood that people will think along those lines not forestall them.
 
rareboy said:
We'll see,

We have only the liar-in-chief's word for this.

And now this morning, his threats against Comey and the details of him demanding loyalty from Comey at the infamous supper....wow....Trump couldn't be ling up the case for obstruction of justice any better if he was actually trying.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ded-comeys-loyalty-that-could-be-devastating/
Click to expand...
Keep in mind, that the FBI only exercises power vested by the Constitution in the President Art I, Sec 2. He could, if he chose, announce the he will personally perform the function of the FBI chief and attorney general. Of course there are time and other practical problems, but it would be legal, and asking for the loyalty of his appointees is not wrong.
 
Clueless. You need to read up on the appointment of the head of the FBI and the role of the head, including why they are supposed to be apolitical.

Your knowledge of how things actually work is pathetic.
 
Benvolio said:
Keep in mind, that the FBI only exercises power vested by the Constitution in the President Art I, Sec 2. He could, if he chose, announce the he will personally perform the function of the FBI chief and attorney general. Of course there are time and other practical problems, but it would be legal, and asking for the loyalty of his appointees is not wrong.
Click to expand...

And depending on how its structured many governors, mayors and Police Chiefs could assume complete control of their IG's and Internal Affairs but you know damn well as a lawyer why that is a BAD idea.
 
rareboy said:
Clueless. You need to read up on the appointment of the head of the FBI and the role of the head, including why they are supposed to be apolitical.

Your knowledge of how things actually work is pathetic.
Click to expand...

How dismissive you are of the Constitution.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top