NotHardUp1
What? Me? Really?
Yes, he is very progressive. However, he is the equivalent of the Episcopalian Presiding Bishop. By that I mean there are only about 1.5 million in the U.S., but there are over 140 million Protestants. So, the Presiding Bishop represents only 1% of American Protestants, and of the larger Christian population in America of 210 million, he represents well below 1%.Having investigated many of the wisdom traditions throughout the world, it seems appropriate to mention the following.
Regarding Buddhism, the Dalai Lama has come out in support of same-sex marriages/partnerships. His reasoning is that, since it's consensual and no one is harmed, it should be all right. Note that, as a Buddhist, he doesn't invoke "with the sanction of God".
Out of the half billion Buddhists in the world, only about half are within the branch that Vajrayana is a subset of. However, it is VERY hard to find internet sources that venture to estimate Buddhist numbers by sect. That takes nothing away from the Dalai Lama, but students of comparative religion in America are easily misled into a reframing of Buddhism as not a religion, which is furthered by Zen Buddhists here, of Western descent and conversion. It seems to come from the discomfort with the majority of the world's Buddhists, the vast majority, worshipping actual gods, hundreds of them, rather than believing in abstract virtues or traits as found in Zen. It's also debatable that even within Vajrayana, it's adherents in Eastern cultures would not likely agree with the statements from American followers who state they don't worship gods.
Thank you. I shall try to find a copy.There is a Hindu story regarding the author Christopher Isherwood and his guru, Swami Premananda, who was a direct disciple of the revered Ramakrishna. Isherwood was asked by his guru to move into the ashram but, before doing so, he felt the need to tell his guru that he had a male lover. Premananda's response was: "If you see in your lover the young Lord Krishna, that will lea you to love and that will lead you to Godhead. I have no problem with it." Isherwood then moved into the ashram and eventually wrote a book which I would highly recommend, "Ramakrishna and his Disciples".
My own teacher, a mahamandeshwara in the orders of Shankara (comparable to a cardinal in the Roman Catholic Church) held the same position in reference to homosexuality.
It's the "people of the book" (the Abrahamic religions) that seem to have the biggest obsession with sex and homosexuality. LOL
As for the monotheistic Abrahamic religions, the three seem to share more a trait of denying homosexuality more than suppressing it, with no disrespect intended for our gay brothers in countries where they may be killed for being outed. There are North African countries along the coast where not only homosexuality is prostituted, but where pederastry is the norm. And we see a similar pattern in the Levant. The ancient taboo of males being passive still prevails, with tops able to deny homosexuality or bisexuality, just as convicts do despite having bitches under their control. Judaism is so hugely divergent, with American and European agnostic strains being LGBTQ activitists, at the same time African, Hasidic, and other old orders condemn it as if they were at Moses' tent.
All I can say is that we have many decades at least before we outlive the vestiges of the gay taboo in the West that is the relic of serfdom, and wives as chattel before that.

