The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Femmephobia in the gay community

"A big taboo that we don't talk about".......WTF! Bullshit!
There's a world of difference between having femminine characteristics and acting/being FEM.
I know guys that display many femminine characteristics, the manner they talk, walk, move, even sit. But that's all there is to it. It's not an act, it's who they are, and most people are fine with them.
Fems, on the other hand, are all about "look at me, look at me..........stop looking at me". They're all about the drama they can cause. Loud, obnoxious, and shallow are not innate characteristics. People have every right to conduct themselves in this manner, but don't be surprised when the majority of people (regardless of gender, orientation, ect) turn their backs and walk away. Fems, in my experience, aren't looking for a supportive community, they're looking for an audience.
 
Fems, in my experience, aren't looking for a supportive community, they're looking for an audience.

Well...having been in a gay bar almost every night for 20 years...I feel qualified to make an observation about the kind of men you are referring to. I am very familiar with them.

Here's the thing though....I called them assholes...because they are...and there are just as many masculine men with the exact same catty bullshit attitude (assholes)...alot of them are even worse...and no one even mentions them...which pretty much supports the OP's position. Just sayin'
 
A lot of misinformation and judgment being spread about fem gays and that the same gay community that preaches about tolerance and DEMANDS acceptance is the first to ... Bully... Yes, bullly... Fem gays for being feminine is fascinating and a topic that will keep coming up until some of you address your femmephobias. Because the tension is going to keep mounting in our community as more and more fem gays step back and say "I refuse to be judged and ostraciszed by the gay community for who I inherently am"

That some of you are trying to differentiate from someone who acts fem and someone who is fem makes no sense either. You say you know plenty of great men who are fem but great guys, then go on a rant against fem guys who aren't great qualifying all fems as those negative traits. How would you feel if people did that about the gay community or a sector of racial minorities and focused on the negatives? I'm middle eastern and would hate people to paint all of us with one brush, yet listen to yourselves... You freely spew ignorance and prejudice about all fems and feel entitled to BULLY them because you're more hetero appearing, and masculine and superior.

If you know quality fem men with fem mannerisms and you still harbor preconcieved negative notions with negative generalizations about fem gays... Then you need to confront your bigotry.

I don't see this issue going away and I see more and more fem gays addressing it; as I've noticed they have been on various gay sites, and pointing out the gay communities double standard and prejudice on this topic.
 
The Fly's reply is a perfect example of being completely unaware of one own femmephobias. He says that there's great people who have very prominent feme traits, characteristics and mannerisms but they are great... Yet they aren't fem to him. Fem to him are evil.

So is this a case of those who are prejudice against femmes redefining what femme is to suit their stubborn dislike of femmes?

That's what I'm gathering here.

That you don't like feminine gay men, but you know of fantastic gay men who are feminine, yet you don't want to catagorize them as feminine (even though, by your own admission they are) instead... You want to strictly label femmes as those who have negative triats....

No inconsistency to serve a bigger agenda in that at all. Right.
 
And really really loved your prespective, rareboy. And that last sentence you wrote tied it up really legit. Thanks for sharing.
 
I think some people have mis-interpreted being femme to being a Drama queen. We need to differentiate that from each other. Like what eastofeden said, there are many "butch" and masculine types who create beef out of nowhere and are hell bitch-ier than anyone I've known, not to mention highly judgmental and have some kinda superiority complex like that of a "Diva".

I've got friends who are very effeminate in their behaviour, yet they don't try to create drama nor beef with others. We as a community is extremely diverse and we need to accept people for who they are, whether their behaviour is similar to the traditional feminine gender stereotypes or even "straight" in the heterosexual context. All this talk about not wanting to seem feminine should never have taken hold in anyone's mind anyway. We should accept ourselves for who we are and not judge others just because of their behavioural inclinations.
 
Simply put... I think many gay men do themselves a disservice by brushing off a segment of our community as avoidable or worth ridicule based on something as petty as theirs mannerisms. That's not to say romantically being with them, but platonically befriending them or just giving yourself a chance to expose yourself to them can expand your own horizon and views.

Get to know fem gay guys and you'll be surprised by how many out there are incredibly KIND, gentle, generous, loyal souls with smart, artistic, poetic, engaging thoughts.

Don't let yourself dictate who people are, let yourself discover it.

Because for every terrible fem gay you can name drop, I can list a plethora of phenomenal fem gays who have been the most persecuted people I know, yet are the most genuine and kind spirits you could ever meet.
 
....I can list a plethora of phenomenal fem gays...
Please do. So then we'd have a better idea of what this thread of yours is about.


And BTW; I hope you're not going to regurgitate the story about transexuals leading the week-long Stonewall Riot— that story isn't supported by the verbal evidence of those in the week-long Stonewall Riot.
 
First off let's tackle this "femmaphobia" hogwash. I have no phobias, I'm not afraid of, or posess hatefull feelings towards femmanine guys. I didn't say anyone was "evil". I never said, nor do I believe, femmininity to be a negative trait. You seem to be claiming obnoxious CONDUCT is a character trait of femminine men, it's not. I have NO agenda to serve. And why it should matter I don't know, but I've been out for 33+ years.
You (DreamDancer) seem to link all feminine guys into a group commonly refer to as "Fems". There's a world of difference. having femminine characteristics does not automaticaly make a person part of the Fem culture. Characteristics such as femmininity are inate and should be seen as just one aspect of an individuals being. But Fems, as a group, are guys with femminine characteristics, who blow it all out of proportion, for attention. The attention they/you recieve is negative...imagine that.
It's just like guys who paint their faces/bodies with their favorite teams colors, their obnoxious.
 
Poster make references that it's complimentary to have less feminine/queens on media representing gay people, and painted them as basically tolerable side shows at Pride. I guess I wonder...what is so shameful about being an inherently effeminate man?

It's lobsters in a tank. The same way you'll see black people criticize those who have darker complexions or Hispanics who look down on other Hispanic nationalities.

Oppressed groups of people oppress each other. Whoever is closest in behavoir or appearance to the oppressor are considered the most desirable members of the oppressed group.

The way to change it is within each individual and being aware of their behavoir and taking responsibility for it. Internalized homophobia affects all of us and understanding it is the first step to overcoming it.

I felt that fragments of these comments at least indirectly touched upon some statements I've made in various discussions, so I'll comment on that.

I agree with what everyone's said pertaining to: there is a struggle often times between more/less masculine men and a lot of it is about social acceptance or personal comfort. That being said, I do also feel there is a backlash many times from within the gay community which overcorrects for this, and gets uncomfortably close to these notions:

If you assert that you aren't effeminate-- you're embarrassed of feminine gay men or suffering internalized homophobia.

If you point out that dominant depictions of gay men are dangerously cliched, stereotyped and limited in depiction, you obviously have a problem with stereotypical gay men.

Although both statements could be true of an individual in question, neither is necessarily true of any individual in question.

I agree that even in this thread, we've seen a little bit of misoginy raring its head, where people talk about the reason they dislike effeminate behaviors is because of "negative traits of women." Without judgment on women, I would agree that many gay men that heavily identify as effeminate, or embrace the idea of femininity, would not be well represented by holding up an image of Hillary Clinton or Sigourney Weaver or some other kick-ass female... they'd be better represented by a reality TV or music diva famous for giving 'tude to fans or photographers and looking glam. And I do personally think of that as a negative reverse-role-model that no one, not even female teeangers, really ought to be emulating or thinking of as something positive to imitate. And I do think that a lot of the more negatively stereotyped extremes of the gay community glamorize this sort of 'diva' mindset.

However, none of that is coming from: I can't stand women who act like women, or I can't stand gay men who sometimes act like those women. It's coming from I'm the kind of guy happier with a book than a reality TV show or a fashion award show, and I generally hate the dumbing-down effect of mass media and the glamorization of the entertainment industry, I lack the ability to be star-studded by celebrities and I wish it was sexy for people to be in front of a camera because of their contribution to human knowledge or social awareness and not for how great a frock they managed to buy from some ridiculously exclusive designer for an award show and how many times they put their palm in the face of someone asking for an autograph.

So a lot of that is just how I'm wired and how I look at the world as a geeky guy.

I do think media depictions of us are limited, and I totally understand the reaction people have to perceiving that someone is saying: we shouldn't show effeminate gay men, but that isn't what I'm saying. I'm saying we have a great diverse continuum of gay men and some small fraction of it has been chosen as the approval-stamped imagery of all gay men. We shouldn't be happy with being a stereotype or a cliche. So when I talk about media diversity, I want the media to show all kinds of gay men... not just one, and then attack anyone who doesn't like it as having some sort of problem with being gay. I think we do a disservice to ourselves when we allow a limited image like that to become our holyfied posterchild.

Celebrate guys who look fantastic in drag and dominate their local gay scene. But celebrate guys who go to an office in a suit and meet with clients or businesspeople from every walk of life, too. And gay farmers, and gay soldiers, and gay olympians, and gay truck drivers. And don't say that those guys aren't all doing their part too to move us all forward on a person by person, relative by relative, friend by friend basis in their everyday lives as they change minds or make people rethink their ideas about gay people or their negative views on gay people.
 
II'm saying we have a great diverse continuum of gay men and some small fraction of it has been chosen as the approval-stamped imagery of all gay men. We shouldn't be happy with being a stereotype or a cliche. So when I talk about media diversity, I want the media to show all kinds of gay men... not just one, and then attack anyone who doesn't like it as having some sort of problem with being gay. I think we do a disservice to ourselves when we allow a limited image like that to become our holyfied posterchild.

Celebrate guys who look fantastic in drag and dominate their local gay scene. But celebrate guys who go to an office in a suit and meet with clients or businesspeople from every walk of life, too. And gay farmers, and gay soldiers, and gay olympians, and gay truck drivers. And don't say that those guys aren't all doing their part too to move us all forward on a person by person, relative by relative, friend by friend basis in their everyday lives as they change minds or make people rethink their ideas about gay people or their negative views on gay people.

:=D:

Hats off to you, sir.

-d-
 
Buzzer, do you realize your articulate and mindful point you made is all about embracing us all? I couldn't agree more with your words... Because your words express a desire to have us all (butch lesbian, fem gay man, masculine gay man, and prissy lesbian) ALL having a place to sit at the dinner table.

Your desire to broaden exposure of various types of gay men is NOT at the expense of femme gay men, and shunning them back in the closet... But a dire need to showcase that butch lesbian, masculine gay and femme gay all galvanized as a community, living their lives, and pursuing one goal: love/equality.

Can't argue with that. But I do wish that was more or less the argument being made by all. Some don't want femme gays to have an invited seat at the table. Thanks for your thoughtful input.
 
Please do. So then we'd have a better idea of what this thread of yours is about.


And BTW; I hope you're not going to regurgitate the story about transexuals leading the week-long Stonewall Riot— that story isn't supported by the verbal evidence of those in the week-long Stonewall Riot.

What kind of idiotic bullshit is that? First of all, yes, it's documented. Second, not transsexuals, but drag queens - a world of difference. Third, there is NOTHING in common between either drag queens and femme boys, OR transsexuals and femme boys.

Seriously, why are you on a gay forum, Pat?
 
Rolyo, for what it's worth... I've had numerous posters tell me Privately that Pat is also the resident board troll: Medusa. So I mean... Consider your source here.
 
Buzzer, don't make me ask you again for those mythical limited depictions of gay people in the media. We both know that ends in awkward silence ;)

DreamDancer, may I suggest that while your heart is most definitely in the right place, you could be slightly less aggressive to perceived disagreements? The only way to have an actual discussion is if you don't treat the opposition as if they just threw a flaming bag of poop in your face :) Nobody is productive in conversation when they feel aggressively attacked.



As for the topic... I am not sure what to add. I saw a lot of valid points, and a lot of bullshit, frankly on both sides - as much as we can talk of sides here - and my impression is that the issue we are having is mostly one of unclear terminology rather than the problems discussed (though those are also real of course).


First of all, there is no ONE type of femme behavior. I can list a few off the top of my head:

- Guys who have some feminine traits, like voice or body language. Frankly, I don't even consider that "feminine", I consider it "gay". Because to be gay in my mind means to not be shackled by heteronormative stereotypes of how "a real man" behaves. Those guys don't imitate women or something, their natural setup is just less butch, freer, more sensual maybe... you name it. There are many ways to describe this type of behavior, mannerisms and talk without ever using a gender word. By the way, I just spent an evening, a night and a morning with a guy like that - who is also a totally regular dude, not a bar scene boi, not bitchy, catty or anything of the sort - and it was the best evening AND the best sex I've had in a while. Just saying.

- Young guys who are simply strongly effeminate both physically and in terms of mannerisms. Often they are the first type I described, who had to turn this behavior into a shield against a homophobic environment - school, family, whatever - and it became second nature, and then first. They could be much more feminine than the first type, because it started as some form of statement, but they are no more "faking" it at this point, than a man is faking having a dick.

- The continuation of the previous type, introduced to the bar scene. I hasten to add, this is no longer simply behavior, it is now a culture as well! A culture that comes with its own rules of behavior and social interaction, and one that's pretty exclusive. It could be all fabulosity, or bitchiness, or any type of behavior that mashes well with extrovert femininity. To think they would ALL be bitchy is demented. True, the process that leads many boys to that type of culture often includes some sort of psychological damage through bullying and oppression, and many people lash out. I find it both understandable, and forgivable. But to put even all the guys in that sub-type as ONE group is made of dumb.

- Drag Queens, though often coming from similar types of behavior as the previous groups, are not necessarily tied to any of them. A drag persona is a fictional character. Drag is performing art. Often the drag persona is the absolute opposite of the guy behind it, and in those cases it tells you nothing about who they are. Drag is also a culture, tied to the bar scene, and it includes a lot of cattiness, its own terminology, backstabbing and all that jazz, but those are at least partially part of the performance.

And I'm sure I could come up with others too.


Femmephobia also isn't a single issue:

- There are the closeted and the not-quite-comfortable-being-out, for whom this type of behavior is simply put, scary. It reminds them of their own sexuality, their own difference from the heteronormativity that they are still either pretending to be a part of, or strongly tied to, even after coming out. And of course this reminder becomes hateful.

- There are people who are not attracted to feminine traits as they see them, and who are not classy enough to keep that sentiment to themselves on the hook-up/dating sites and apps, which creates this annoying tag of "no femmes". Often, those don't hate femininity, and though they might be part of the first type, they could also just be pretentious fucks who also don't like "fatties" or "Asians", and are too callous to realize that it's not ok to put that on a profile, because it creates a sense of discrimination. You can be bothered to just politely decline the interest of a femme guy when he contacts you, instead of throwing it in his face by default. Or you can be a douche.

- There are the ignorant people - often sharing similar qualities with the first two types - who just don't really know all that much about gay culture or the bar scene, and who equate the unpleasant and loudest parts of it with femininity, since femme guys are the most visible ones. As somebody already pointed out, assholes at the bar are not necessarily femme, and frankly, at least in Chicago, my experience is that the biggest assholes are ALWAYS the jock types, and NEVER the femme boys, but that's irrelevant. What matters is that ignorance and lack of actual interest to learn what's up can cause this misplaced femmephobia by wrong association.

- Then there are the ultra unpleasant activists who are so thirsty for breeder approval, that they are ready to cut anything out of themselves to fit with the heteronormative crowd. To them everything that the straights don't like is undesirable, and what's more anti-heteronormative than a guy acting "like a girl"?



So yeah, in the end, this is not a single issue. It's multiple issues deceptively covered by the same two terms - "femme" and "femmephobia" - but they are actually very diverse, caused by different things and not really subject to a sweeping statement solution.
 
WE are talking about femmephobia. YOU are not talking about anything and should really gtfo of this topic :) I am not going to respond to any of your future posts here, unless they are actually on topic.
 
WE are talking about femmephobia. YOU are not talking about anything and should really gtfo of this topic :) I am not going to respond to any of your future posts here, unless they are actually on topic.

Pat's always in his own little separate kids table/sandbox version of any ongoing serious discussion. The trouble is if you actually pay close attention to what he's making in the sandbox, it's usually offensive.
 
Back
Top