gay/bi/homo should be executed

[gsdx]

I don't go to their church and pray 5 times a day.
Any link of your death cult statement? Zero

And you have provided nothing except a stupid video.

 

[Telstra]

And you have provided nothing except a stupid video.

What info do YOU want ???????????????

 

[Taz]

oh telly, the jimmys you rustle are not even real.

 

[Willie Boy]

He is definitely representing Christianity....

No. He is representing secular religion. True Christianity is not practiced much on this Earth any more. The reason, believers have been misled by secular religion.

I don't believe in you. Therefore, I can judge that you do not exist.

You lose. I win.

Quoted for truth.

 

[xboxfan34]

All I gotta say to this pastor is.

Come the fuck at me, bro.

 

[Keeland]

Exposing hate speech and hate groups should be required of every news-media outlet in the so-called civilized world.

Is it possible to do that without doing their 'work' for them – spreading their message – giving them the airtime they're probably hoping for? I don't think it is..

So beheadings, flying airliners into buildings, screaming at funerals that god hates fags and they and dead soldiers are burning in hell, killing and kidnapping hundreds of children, other televangelists preaching gays must die and AIDS, earthquakes, droughts, floods and tsunamis are god's retribution for allowing gays to live should not be reported, along with the uncountable usual of the religious bashing and murdering homosexuals — and by extension everything that isn't puppies and kittens, including murders, robberies, world politics, local politics — because they give the perpetrators the publicity they want.

 

[Kahaih]

So beheadings, flying airliners into buildings, screaming at funerals that god hates fags and they and dead soldiers are burning in hell, killing and kidnapping hundreds of children, other televangelists preaching gays must die and AIDS, earthquakes, droughts, floods and tsunamis are god's retribution for allowing gays to live should not be reported, along with the uncountable usual of the religious bashing and murdering homosexuals — and by extension everything that isn't puppies and kittens, including murders, robberies, world politics, local politics — because they give the perpetrators the publicity they want.

You might want to turn your drama dial back one or two dozen notches before you give yourself an aneurysm.

 

[Keeland]

You're the one advocating news-media censorship, no small thing.

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

betta no say planet stills wound ten a so many ways
_ooh wot ways dat?_
"titttars"

anyway

shame ons UN ans alls a heads on all thang
_ooh ya dun it now_

thankyou

 

[MakeDigitalLove]

Actually i don't know what you are talking about now.
I said non-believers can judge the bible better than the believers because the are neutral and not biased or blind by faith.

Non-believers can be biased against religion because they see what people do with religion.

 

[chrisrobin]

.
There are times when you need to confront your adversaries:

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

Non-believers can be biased against religion because they see what people do with religion.

at good bit
_yea 1 many tools a folkees play _

@muhawahahawa@

ooh no wake up centurys
_ garlic sausages _
wot?

anyway thankyou

audience will now interval ans drink a tea

ha

 

[MrPerfectMan]

You're the one advocating news-media censorship, no small thing.

You must be joking. The news media is a business just like any other. Many of the articles simply amount to baiting devised to illicit a reaction. Hence, for quite a while there, we got news articles whenever Sarah Palin took a dump. They read the comments section as much as we do, and know how to increase hits to their page.

I think what we all would like is more honest reporting. I could start a newspaper about racist skinheads and quote them day and night, but would you really want to read it? Now, saying gay people should be killed is not a good thing, but reporting about it has two-fold consequences. It riles up hatred on both sides (a bad thing) instead of building bridges. It also ostracizes the person which can be good, but sometimes people get ostracized for stupid things, and their lives are ruined because the media reported about it. Also, who is this guy, and why should we care? If the POPE had said this, then it would've been real news!

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

You must be joking. The news media is a business just like any other. Many of the articles simply amount to baiting devised to illicit a reaction. Hence, for quite a while there, we got news articles whenever Sarah Palin took a dump. They read the comments section as much as we do, and know how to increase hits to their page.

I think what we all would like is more honest reporting. I could start a newspaper about racist skinheads and quote them day and night, but would you really want to read it? Now, saying gay people should be killed is not a good thing, but reporting about it has two-fold consequences. It riles up hatred on both sides (a bad thing) instead of building bridges. It also ostracizes the person which can be good, but sometimes people get ostracized for stupid things, and their lives are ruined because the media reported about it. Also, who is this guy, and why should we care? If the POPE had said this, then it would've been real news!

?

dunno !real news! workin it ways every second world ova < no a news
_but ans a twirlssss_
"1st world audience keep a nose"
^in ta pot anoda rose^

thankyou

 

[Keeland]

Now, saying gay people should be killed is not a good thing, but reporting about it has two-fold consequences. It riles up hatred on both sides (a bad thing) instead of building bridges.

Christian hatred is already there. it doesn't need riling up. That jackass preacher should be televised on every channel everywhere, wall to wall.

Who wants to build bridges with some asshole who counsels murder? WTF is wrong with you?

 

[Telstra]

Non-believers can be biased against religion because they see what people do with religion.

No, they are neutral against religion but will pound on any wrong with religion.

 

[Telstra]

You must be joking. The news media is a business just like any other. Many of the articles simply amount to baiting devised to illicit a reaction. Hence, for quite a while there, we got news articles whenever Sarah Palin took a dump. They read the comments section as much as we do, and know how to increase hits to their page.

I think what we all would like is more honest reporting. I could start a newspaper about racist skinheads and quote them day and night, but would you really want to read it? Now, saying gay people should be killed is not a good thing, but reporting about it has two-fold consequences. It riles up hatred on both sides (a bad thing) instead of building bridges. It also ostracizes the person which can be good, but sometimes people get ostracized for stupid things, and their lives are ruined because the media reported about it. Also, who is this guy, and why should we care? If the POPE had said this, then it would've been real news!

umm the Pope has no more power than that pastor in the internet age.
Actually i find the pope in the news report annoying when the topic has nothing to do with the pope.

 

[mbamike]

.
There are times when you need to confront your adversaries:

I just love this clip. I have watched it several times in the past. Very educational too!

 

[johaninsc]

No, they are neutral against religion but will pound on any wrong with religion.

 

[Special K]

No. He is representing secular religion. True Christianity is not practiced much on this Earth any more. The reason, believers have been misled by secular religion.

Just out of curiosity, what is the "True Christianity" to which you refer, and what does it entail?