Gay Republicans Are Self-Loathing And Don't Care About Gay Rights

[DiamondSkin]

C'mon, Your point of view is like trying to pick up a turd from the clean end. You make no sense.

I can imagine you saying that to yourself in the mirror and it makes me giggle.

No referendum or logic to retort?

Oh well.

Politicians claim to support all kinds of things.

Yes, but many of them actually follow through.

When Republican with an anti-gay agenda plans an anti-gay agenda, he's likely to follow through. Especially in a red state.

But what do you care? You're bi and you still go women if that goes south...

It has to come down to overall values that I support.

Yes, we know. You put your values on a totem pole.

Gay rights all the way at the bottom.

Preventing America from becoming Socialist/Marxist/whatever at the top. Oh and lower taxes.

Unlike you, I don't have 'value hierachy'....

I knew Obama was lying through his entire campaign. Did you? probably not. You only heard what you wanted to.

What does Obama's supposed lying have to do with gay rights and gay Republican's apathy about it...?

 

[hungrybrownbear]

I'm reading into what you post and what you write.

I don't see you denying it and you post below just seems to support what I say.

Because I don't see how you can even infer that, you argue with so many presuppositions, its really sad and really hard to have a discussion.

I'm denying it. Ok?

Most gays are Democrats for the same reason most African-Americans are.

It's kinda hard to be Republican when they're always launching some sort of anti-gay Proposition every damn month.

Like I said, one clear sign of a totalitarian. Opposition is bad, everyone should agree with my idea of how life should be. Or they are a bigot. End of discussion.

 

[JasunStrikesBack]

By the way elvin1, you're way too good looking to be a liberal.

Yeah because we sure want some hotties like Rush Limbaugh, Gary Baur and Strom Thurmond.

Ew with those ugly Liberals like Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Matt Damon, Jude Law and Ben Affleck.

Your profile also says that you are married, so.... what rights are you complaining about? Some states allow gay marriage some don't. That's the American way.

No... the American Way is equality for all. Not "equality so long as you live in the right place." That's called "segregation."

 

[JasunStrikesBack]

What does Obama's supposed lying have to do with gay rights and gay Republican's apathy about it...?

Nothing. But Conservatives pretty much deflect when you have them backed into a corner.

 

[DiamondSkin]

Because I don't see how you can even infer that, you argue with so many presuppositions, its really sad and really hard to have a discussion.

It's not my fault you're so transparent...

I'm denying it. Ok?

I would hope it's the truth...

Like I said, one clear sign of a totalitarian. Opposition is bad, everyone should agree with my idea of how life should be.

I'm a totalitarian because I believe that all gay people should care about gay rights since it directly impacts their lives and status as second-class citizen?

Yep, that makes sense...

 

[DiamondSkin]

Yup, I have all I want. Good luck getting what you want with your narrow minded gay bashing attitude.

Yes, it's why you don't care about gay rights, no?

Again, no logic or referendum to retort.

Come now.

 

[hungrybrownbear]

Nope you're totalitarian, because you are making judgments about one group based on the actions of some in that group. You cannot stand the opposition party. You wished everyone would just agree with your ideals, because since they are your ideals, they must be accurate. Key word, judgmental. Doing the same exact thing, you don't want others to do. Ha.

 

[JasunStrikesBack]

He probably knows you love him anyway.

That's the most loathsome thing I've ever read.

But it's the kind of cold, heartless, vicious, mean-spirited thing I expect from a gay conservative. I've never met one who wasn't sociopathic and incapable of emotion.

 

[hungrybrownbear]

I love when Jasun pwns.

IMO, he just comes off as uncouth, uneducated and narrow-minded.
When you bring subjective, exaggerated statements into an argument, it may come off as epic.
Well, if that's the definition of "pwn"...

 

[JasunStrikesBack]

I love when Jasun pwns.

Oh, I'm just getting started.

 

[DiamondSkin]

Nope you're totalitarian, because you are making judgments about one group based on the actions of some in that group.

Again, I'm totalitarian because I think all gay persons should care about gay rights regardless of political party?

And NOT vote for anti-gay politician?

Yep, that makes sense.

You cannot stand the opposition party.

Actually, I agree with many of their fiscal policies except when it comes corporate regulation.

I can't stand the anti-gay agenda in the Republican Party and I don't have tolerance for anti-gay Republicans who push for anti-gay laws and legislation.

Sorry it makes me a Nazi...

Clearly you think it's okay to have anti-gay agendas in the Republican Party....

You wished everyone would just agree with your ideals, because since they are your ideals, they must be accurate. Key word, judgmental.

Nope, just idealistic.

This thread has already shown that gay Republicans or supposed Independents are willing to throw gay rights under the bus if their tax refund is bit bigger so they can afford that Audi next spring....

 

[hungrybrownbear]

Who said I did't care about them?

You just assumed, a narrow mind will do that.

he seems to do that in every single one of his posts. even in the post above me. focusing on the minor and twisting to make the poster come off as a bigot.
why do I even bother?

 

[DiamondSkin]

Who said I didn't care about them?

You just assumed, a narrow mind will do that.

You put other 'issues' above them like you're stacking boxes.

I don't know about you, but political issues and gay rights aren't mutually exclusive and they sure as hell ain't boxes to be stacked.

It's always important to me regardless of what's happening and it's always at the 'top'.

You apparently keep it somewhere on the bottom in deference to other issues which shows that you don't really care about it unless it's convienent for you to care about it...

 

[JasunStrikesBack]

Again, I'm totalitarian because I think all gay persons should care about gay rights regardless of political party?

And NOT vote for anti-gay politician?

Yep, that makes sense.

And she's the one who said I "exaggerate."

But you know.. you gotta consider the source. Not the sharpest knife, that one.

 

[JasunStrikesBack]

My, my, a bunch of biased opinions being thrown back and forth to one another like a football. How productive. Really, what is the point of this thread?

Venting anger.

And we need to do it.

but I'm still on side with outing gay Republicans.

 

[SilverWolf]

My, my, a bunch of biased opinions being thrown back and forth to one another like a football. How productive. Really, what is the point of this thread?

It gives a general idea about what is really important to some people and how they view things and some small insight into personality

 

[hungrybrownbear]

Who are we talking about now? You?

Really because last time I checked I don't base my arguments on emotional driven statements to prove my point.

This man didn't even know the difference between a public good and socialism in action.

If he's going to use inaccurate information in his posts to make a point and then run away when you point it out, yeah that's pretty uneducated.

oh and Stacy, If you think throwing baseless "cold hard punches" in an argument makes you win, well I'm sorry you think that.

 

[DiamondSkin]

Maybe you should get to know me before you throw stones.

It just might help your cause.

This is what YOU said:

THERE are more important things going on that you can not seem to comprehend.

You have EVERY right that any one else has except marriage.

This tells me everything I need to know about your view of gay rights....

 

[hungrybrownbear]

And she's the one who said I "exaggerate."

But you know.. you gotta consider the source. Not the sharpest knife, that one.

And this is coming from someone who works in the porn industry. Not exactly, what I call a reliable source on all things political. Now if you actually read what I wrote, instead of believing the twisted conclusions of the OP, maybe you wouldn't be so quick to judge. Oh wait, yes you would.

Take a simple course in political science, and familiarize yourself with the terms before you try using them incorrectly in an argument, because when arguing with someone who has a major expertise in the area, all you can do is run off, like you did and then accuse me of picking and choosing. Ha.

 

[JasunStrikesBack]

You guys can say what you want, I'm just glad the Republicans had a good night this week.

You won 2 and lost 8... including one you haven't lost in over 100 years.

that's a good night for you?

I think and hope America is finally starting to wake up. I hope they do wake up while we still have an America.

America did wake up and just in time.