Fair enough. And I am a foreigner too, so I feel ya.
To answer your actual post from before - I was joking, although I do feel there is a bit of a douche quality to calling yourself SA.
As for "the first 10 pages" thing, I could say the same. Clearly we are not understanding each other. Also, so many people never got past the way I phrased things to actually read the things themselves, but that's my fault for phrasing them provocatively.
All that said though, there is nothing more I can add. The very defense of SA makes it redundant and illogical. If there isn't ONE straight behavior, then there can't be one gay behavior either. The fact someone feels they are so far removed from "teh gay" that they are more similar to some "straight" stereotype already proves there is no gay behavior to be the opposite of. If you are a gay guy who doesn't act like a stereotype, then that means not every gay guy acts the same way, which means there is no gay acting to be the opposite of.
The whole thing borders on the absurd.
Some food for thought: has anybody heard of a "white-acting" black/Asian guy? A "man-acting" woman? A "Muslim-acting" Christian? A "pedophile-acting" necrophile? Other than the last one, I am sure examples of all of the above can be found, but has anyone ever met a person that identified themselves like that? "Sure, I'm black, but I'm not like THOSE blacks you know, I'm white-acting"... Wuut?