- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Posts
- 60,620
- Reaction score
- 14,337
- Points
- 113
It's not really a left-right issue. Because we have a largely civilian population who never served in the military and we have a big gap between people in rural areas who grew up hunting and using guns, it's easy to reduce it to "left vs right". It's really more about people who are familiar with guns vs those who don't know much about them.This is exactly the mistake people on the left always make.
I've been hunting with people who brought an AR-15. Part of their reasoning was that they wanted to be able to take down feral hogs that they might encounter (something that assault weapons are NOT designed to do in spite of the gun industry's marketing). They did shoot the AR-15 for sport but they did also use it for shooting deer. After seeing the condition of the deer, it became apparent to me that this wasn't the best choice if you're actually planning to eat what you catch. Looking around at other hunters, I saw a lot of excessive weaponry and lots of military camo being worn, so there's a lot of guys out there on some sort of weekend warrior trip with their big toys.The argument on the other side isn't about need at all. No one is hunting with an AR-15. That's never been the point of having one. You can talk about how dangerous they are all day long, and that will only justify having them in the minds of people who buy them. The point is how dangerous they are.
The statistics say that there's a few people who own a lot of these guns. They're collectors. There's not a logical reason why they want to collect these guns. But if you look at how the gun industry has marketed them, they have been marketed as hunting guns and as home protection devices. You are correct that the weapon was designed for one purpose- the Army wanted a gun with a large magazine that could penetrate a helmet. And that's the point- these guns were designed from the start to kill people.
The AR-15 isn't responsible for most of the gunshot deaths. Handguns are. About 2/3 of those deaths are suicides. Handgun deaths are something that we can do something about because they are so closely associated with mental health issues or crimes of passion.You want to stop people from buying them, not only do you have to have a ban, you have to address why they want one in the first place, because I guarantee you that a ban isn't going to stop the determined, and while easy access is certainly unwise and should be curtailed, the underlying issue will be there until we stop blaming the tool used to pursue it for everything.
There's not much that we're going to be able to do with semi-automatics and assault weapons. Since 2004, there's been close to 4 million of them sold in the US. Overall, the long gun market grew 3% since 2004; the "modern sporting weapon" market grew 40%. Guess which segment the gun industry was making the most money on?
We've seen what just one of these weapons can do. Imagine the killing that can happen now that there's millions of them in circulation. There's no mental health solution to these mass shooting events. When someone decides they want to kill people in large groups quickly, we've just provided a more efficient means for them to do so.
We've long passed the tipping point. As troubled as I am by the civil liberties issues, it's either going to have to be that the bullets are banned or the existing weaponry has to be taken out of circulation.










 ](*,)](/images/smilies/bang.gif)






