luckynumbah7
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2008
- Posts
- 8,814
- Reaction score
- 117
- Points
- 63
- Location
- City
- Website
- www.justusboys.com
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/18-old-said-caught-kevin-200229346.html
The alleged victim managed to tape Spacey. To me if you can video tape someone touching your penis... you're not too drunk to say "no".
Setups involve texting your girlfriend and 'a picture's worth a thousand words for winning an argument o'disbelief' with said chicky, now, is it? Because there couldn't possibly be something akin to an an invisible umbilical cord attached to most phones of the under thirty set that doesn't involve nefarious purpose?
The younger years are always on their phone, including when they're talking with other people. Hell, so are quite a few older people. It's not difficult to notice someone using their phone. And you can't read texts under the table so I can't consider it entrapment when the device was acknowledged. Just because the over 35 set forget that phones are ubiquitous with youth doesn't make it entrapment, it's not a wire and that wasn't a sting operation.
And remember, sexual assault in legal terms must be physical and repetitive after a negative response is given. Especially on tape. District attorney's don't generally bring out sexual assault felony charges for "He grabbed your crotch, you declined, he apologized for the confusion and so you stopped plying him with alcoholic comestibles."
Perhaps you could explain how multiple 'let's not' and subsequent touching is entrapment? Sexual assault has a rather specific definition in law. It's 'physically hit on 'em, don't acknowledge the error of your perception or their declining and then continue with the behavior ".
It wouldn't have been any better if he'd left after the second or third or however many recordings he'd gotten, either, since Spacey's actions still involved 'He isn't responding how I hope, let's keep trying'. When you add that he tried to pick someone up in a restaurant where he knows not everyone is legal and he's buying booze 'shifty behavior' doesn't even begin to cover it.
Or we could discuss the theme of guys trying very, very hard to ignore that a successful guy is using all the tricks of the trade to get someone in bed without actually looking for consent. Wearing someone down doesn't quite meet that consent definition in my book and I'd like to know how you're justifying the behavior when it involves liquor and someone many years older buying said liquor with sexual motivations on the table when there's apparently video evidence of pervasive declining.


this elementary, dishonest, one-dimensional perception of abuse or abusive relationships is very unsettling.