I never wrote that it wasn't shallow. It may very well be shallow, but whether bisexuals prefer masculine men in general is an interesting topic of discussion IMO. You weren't attacking my "taste" or preference? What about that remark about our preferences reflect our personal insecurities and hang-ups? Let me explain my preference a little more specifically. I've been a jock or an athlete for most of my life, and I've kept company with other jocks for the most part. Sorry, but I've never run into an effeminate guy playing soccer, basketball, baseball or any contact sport like football or wrestling. If they exist, I've never seen one.
I really don't have that much in common with a guy that looks like Screech and speaks with a lisp.Okay, I realize that this is an extreme example. However, I'm more attracted to very masculine, athletic men because I normally spend more time playing, watching, and discussing sports with them. Sorry, but men that are athletic and in shape are physically more appealing to me. Am I the only guy that finds athletic guys more physically appealing? I don't think so.
Also I once saw this show on the Health Channel about sexual attraction and which traits make females more attractive to males and vice versa. It was concluded that most females are attracted to physically fit and strong, powerful men, because females normally look for a protector & provider. Now, a man like Donald Trump would be considered attractive to females, because he's a powerful man as well as a good provider. However, I don't exactly know how this translates to male-male attraction. All I know is that I prefer very masculine, athletic men because their bodies are normally better, and they're normally more confident and reassured.
On the other hand, it was concluded that males are generally more attracted to females with an hour glass shape or a voluptuous physique, because these women are seen as more fertile as some of the organs associated with or related to the reproductive system are more exaggerated or more visually apparent. For example, voluptuous females normally have larger breasts and wider hips. These women have very "female" physical traits in general.
Further, if you consider the social psychological aspect of human sexual attraction, people may be attracted to a certain type of female or male that is promoted by the media as being the ideal type. However, this doesn't always work. For example, you'll find alot of guys that don't find Kate Moss attractive, more than likely, because she's far from voluptuous. As a personal example, I don't find Brad Pitt or Leonardo DiCaprio to be that attractive either. I definitely have a preference for athletic guys and brunettes with light eyes. Finally, more people may be attracted to an athletic, strong, & powerful man and a voluptuous woman, but most people end up coupling with someone in their own range of physical attractiveness. In other words, most people couple with someone in their own league.
And is there a point to this? I said THIS THREAD is shallow. Geez, get a grip and stop take shit so damn personal.  ](*,)](/images/smilies/bang.gif)
But you are starting to make me wonder why you feel you need to justication for your attraction to me. When I don't care what you like. This thread speaks of another shallow aspect of the queer community, but whatever it seems society in general is quite shallow.










Your passive aggressive bullshit hasn't proven thing to me besides you are simpleton. STFU talking to me. WINK, WINK, HINT, HINT. 





















