The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

NO BLACKS,NO ASIANS,NO INDIANS??? Grindr is the enemy of ethnic men?

Frankly, Telstra, I find his hastefully-formed conclusion neither accurate nor productive. (If he's simply looking for reactions, which I have an inkling is the case, than I'll stop here and let him wallow in his deliberate puerility. Otherwise, if he's for real, here we go.)

I'm guessing he's not going to read and grasp my whole message.

First of all I'm not trying to be mean. You're grown and can do whatever you want. But the font you are using is very distracting especially when discussing dialogue like this. That's your business you can use whatever font you want, but it's just straining on my eyes.

So I hope you don't get offended, but I'm going to disable that font.

I read everything. lol. Sometimes I lurk. Other times I'm a ticking time bomb and I don't stop lol.

One thing that he hasn't taken into account is the more-than-abundance of Asian and African individuals who are above the stage of self-acceptance and expressed pride. We have so many of them here in California, Washington and New York; to name just a few states in the States.

I never said they didn't accept themselves. I just said it was hard for them to. I'm a gay black man here in California. I understand.

I don't doubt that some Asian countries do still currently fall a little behind the Western World in LGBT rights, but that itself doesn't represent the many confident individuals who are out and about in trying to hit up anyone they choose.
Not everyone is that lucky though. Some people still live by their family values.

Like for example myself. Being black I'm raised to be masculine and act like a stallion and be well endowed. I'm a very goofy, nerdy looking black guy, So in some cases I'm already failing to deliver in that regard.

Furthermore, what about those white folks who suffer a rigid Euro-Christian background and still believe in ex-gay ministries? (After all, the birth of anti-gay sentiments and attitudes are a predominantly Caucasian thing; if you research your world history!! And, most people who were in the ex-gay movement in the USA, and then in Europe, were white bible-belt folks.) As far as I'm concerned, these individuals can still scurry around the backwaters of the black closet and hook-up with other married white men with little to no problem.

Well white gays are the majority. So what if a few are into the ex gay movement. The white gays control the gay community and they reap the benefits of their white supremacy. So it's ok.

What's my obvious point? It's obvious that outness and self-acceptance aren't the issue at hand. So, what is?
The fact if you're gay, you better be white.

I don't claim to be an expert anymore than Taralen here claims. What I do believe is the root of the problem is exposure. It's that simple. I know people have heard it tiresome amount of times before. We see beautified Caucasian people everywhere in the media. They are the majority of the Western World. We see them in our daily routines. They define beauty in the West. They even influence Asian countries as to what beauty is, because modern Asia see's a lot of our Western Caucasian advertisement in their own homeland. Our brains, over time, has learned to become primarily attracted to specific Caucasian features; because it's what we've mostly experienced.

Exactly. White is right. White is beautiful. White is attractive. So it's only natural for us gay men to fall victim to that as well right? Is that a crime?

On the other hand, how often do we see Asians and Black people in comparison to their Caucasian counterparts? Representation has gotten better, granted, but still. How often? We don't see "slit-eyes" as beautiful because it's hardly there in our daily basis; not in the media nor in our regular daily routine. When we do see it those few times, we squint with disgust because our un-experienced brains regard it as out-of-the-ordinary. (Caricature portrayals in pop-culture hasn't helped either.) The ordinary, as our brains have learned, are the Caucasian standards of beauty; because it's mostly what our brains have known. Same goes with dark-skinned bodies with 'unattractive' body features (thicker lips, curled 'messy' hair, etc.).

I can only speak as a gay black man.

There was this show called Noah's Arc. It was about a screenwriter who was a feminine white collar gay black in Los Angeles/Hollywood. He was very well spoken and sophisticated. All of his friends and romantic interests were black deviant acting men. That is so unrealstic as far as LA is concerned. That shit might fly in Atlanta or DC.

But here in LA, a gay black man in that position is going to be with a non black men. Is that's the type of gay man he is going to be around in the corporate business world.

I cannot speak for gay asian men, but I will say this. Gay asian men will more than likely be around non gay asian men. If a gay asian man is with the same race, he moves to a asian homogeneous country like Japan or the Philippines or find love.

That, I believe, is why many White folks do not hit up Asians and Black folks; and why many Asians and Blacks are not, respectively, interested in Asians and Blacks. (You know. The kind branded as racially "self-hating".) That, I believe, is why porn is mostly consisting of White heads instead of colored.

No they are just racists and jerks and don't want to ruin their inner circuit of white gays only. It could also be a status and image thing. They don't the extra pressure. "You're gay and in an interracial relationship. Dude whats wrong with you.?" "You're gay and you're with a fat guy. Man what's your deal?" "You're gay and your boyfriend looks like a ugly serial killer" "Your gay and you're with a sissy twink, how sad" etc.

The second part about gays of color not being with their own race, again I already mentioned that.

Gay black men are together because they usually don't leave the inner city and street culture, and find other gay black men to relate to that.

Professional gay black men in the business world are going to be with non black men 95% of the time.

With asian men it's the same. Usually asian guys find love with other asian guys in asian dominated countries. Here in the states, many are with white men. Hence the name rice queen and stuff like that.

The final point you made about porn, it's just because porn is racist.

~~~Optional read~~~
All this can, thankfully, be corrected. Though, I speak from experience when I say, it wasn't easy. All the years of damage might still linger. For me, as an Asian, it has. I've been self-accepting of my homosexuality way longer than I have accepted my racial self; the latter of which has started happening only less than a decade ago, which is rather recent in comparison. I had grown up in Republican-town back suburbs of Northern California. It was even more horrid in rigid White-town America of Central California. In these places, I hardly got to see many asian folks. Those few that I did see in these regions were obviously not affected by the media nor anything else that would influence their definition of beauty; how could they be, since they don't see themselves in it? They don't see Asians as an existence in their regular lives. Rather, they see Asians more as an outside foreign that they don't care to associate with. They constantly go for White people, while rejecting other Asians. They never did get the very people they were chasing, because those visually-inexperienced White folks had the same attitude towards asians as said-mentioned Asians had towards their own race.

Why were you in Norcal? Did your family own a business there?

I have to agree asians are not represented in the media at all sadly.

I think why you had an easier time being asian than gay, is because naturally asian men are feminized. So I believe the transition was easy for you.

As I said earlier, me being black I can't do that. By societies standards, I'm supposed to be way more masculine that I am now.

Asians are not on adult websites like Xtube and such, because they don't feel their own physical type can fit into these places. It has nothing to do with "self-acceptance" and "being out". It has to do with an injured confidence due to lack of exposure.
I agree. I also think it has to do with culture. You don't see that many asians doing deviant acts. I mean they do, but it's rare. It's not as much as other races.

So, the correction phases eventually took position. I started looking at Asian media more and more where I can find it, trying to convince myself that I'm interested in what I was seeing; even looked at Asian porn. It was all a bit of a forced chore, but I damned as hell kept with it. After a few more years, I have learned to desire the certain features of my own race. Now-a-days, I don't see why idiots hate the "slit eyes" so much, since they are nothing but sexy to me. Given the right accents, they (slit eyes) give off a devilish kind of appeal even.

Yes I like all races of guys and I'm glad you like your own race of guys.

I was "healed" of the "self-hatred". Now, I don't give a shit if the guy is White, or Asian. I'd fuck a cute abs-defined big-titted muscular slit-eye any day! Often times, I even get frustrated if I search up Asian guys for porn and can't find anything.

I understand.
 
Too much is made of the supposed "hate" of so-called "Asians" in American hookup sites, or even porn. Go to India, or China, or Japan, or the Philippines, or Thailand, and see how much of the porn consumed there features Caucasian races.

I have no idea what you think this has to do with anything. You might as well mention that in Southern India a heavy build is the beauty standard as a "disproof" that there is any harmful relationship of weight and beauty in western societies.
 
What I also find trite is people who really play down that there is in fact hate involved in prefences, not all the time but it exists. But people really play it down like it almost non-existent.

It's like please, people still get upset that that is a Spanish language option on a Debit Card reader still.

Everytime the discussion comes up virtually ever, including at however many years I've been at JUB, it's as if it's the very first time the discussion is happening and you have to work through the usual arrangement of hurdles meant to dismiss the issue. "Oh well that's just on apps." "Well those are just the jerks."

I get that there's a large investiture for some people in the idea of the "gay community" as this inclusive thing they're proud of and feel personal investment in and has built good things for gay people. But I think to me and really any ethnic gay man, it's just watching people go through stages of denial listening to people trying to make it sound as if this problem doesn't exist, doesn't virtually perfectly mirror what you see in the mainstream society (gays didn't specially sidestep racial issues or gain immunity to influence from a prejudiced beauty standard just because being gay made them a minority group). It's not that we (ethnic gay men) are in any doubt this happens, we get to go out and live it and deal with the awkward pretzel-shaped manuevering people do to let us know without letting us know. But 100% of the strife discussing it is entirely with getting our own community to even be willing to acknowledge it exists--- because it largely seems that the community doesn't want to.

Nope, it's not the odd man out, it's not the random rabid racist, it's not just people under 24 on apps.

Stupid comparisons to "but I get rejected too because of weight/shape/looks" are pointless. We all get rejected for those reasons as well, once you get past the large filter of "sorry, I'm just totally not into x's at all."
 
I'm Asian, and I don't find 80% of black men attractive. It's not because of their skin color, because I love really dark Indian men, and Mexicans.

I don't think it's racist not to be attracted to a certain race. But don't be weird, and call us Asians Ching Chongs, LOL.
 
It wouldn't work out anyway, black homos tend to be size queens and I'm 99% sure your dick is the size of a vienna sausage

To be fair, I've had people tell me they're not into Asians. It can sting me sometimes. Yeah.....
 
Stupid comparisons to "but I get rejected too because of weight/shape/looks" are pointless. We all get rejected for those reasons as well, once you get past the large filter of "sorry, I'm just totally not into x's at all."

Race isn't special. For everything there's a heirarchy. That doesn't meant the hierarchy may not be based on some influential, societaly approved stereotypes about whatever-it-is. That includes weight/shape/looks.

Unless you think the conception of race also has has nothing to do with weight, shape or looks. I mean, I'd thought you would have noticed there's more to the social concept of race than pigment.
 
-From what I can figure most of the 'socially ingrained dating preferences' have to do with shape or looks in some fashion. From the "I'm not attracted to black people (Wait, you don't look/sound black) to "I'm just not attracted to trans people (despite knowing the same amount of info about what's going under the clothes as you get from everyone else. Which, to wit, is NOTHING BUT GUESSWORK) (and no, that point is not here to be argued. It's an example of rejection before one even knows what an individual has), right on to assumptions about what weight means to ones character.

And that last one definitely exists. TL;DR, Weight/height and pigment make a difference in racial beauty standards, I'd think you'd agree, so there's no reason why weight and height are suddenly neutral if race is 'set to the side'.

But not special via comparison, no. I wouldn't want anyone to fall into the trap of thinking only their exclusion in the dating pool via social messages is worthy of thought.
 
Race isn't special. For everything there's a heirarchy. That doesn't meant the hierarchy may not be based on some influential, societaly approved stereotypes about whatever-it-is. That includes weight/shape/looks.

Unless you think the conception of race also has has nothing to do with weight, shape or looks. I mean, I'd thought you would have noticed there's more to the social concept of race than pigment.

Now we're getting to the nitty gritty. Everybody isn't going to be everybody's cup of tea, but when you ask a lot of these people to explain their preferences there's usually a mountain of ignorance and generalization behind it. "I don't like black people cuz they're just so ghetto!" I've seen comments as such expressed more than a few times here on JUB. Often times this preference for non-blacks excludes those who aren't tradionally black ie baggy pants, hat backwards, walk with swag, listen to hiphop, urban stylings etc. What they mean to say is they don't like the black typecast.

I'm a homosexual, I'm not sexually attracted to women. Common denominator, ALL women, every single one whether she's tall, fat, short, dark, light, educated, homeless, rich, they all have a vagina. In this regard every single woman is exactly the same. None of them have that glorious penis that I worship so much. Writing off an entire race is different because no people of any race are monolithic. Asians aren't all the same. Blacks aren't all the same. White people aren't all the same. Physiologically, culturally or otherwise. Casting out an entire group would lead me to believe one has the impression that everyone in the group is the same or possesses the same quality the person has found undesirable. It'd make more sense to me if whites/blacks/asians were all the same.
 
I'm Asian, and I don't find 80% of black men attractive.
As a "healed" ex-whitewashed, I'm sorry to say, love: you really don't know what you're missing. As an Asian muscular twink-jock, I'd 'impregnate' any hot African guy any day!! But hey, Asians like you don't like them. More for me!! :gogirl: :gogirl:

It's not because of their skin color, because I love really dark Indian men, and Mexicans.
I can't help but think it is. "Skin color" is more than just the mere color-tone of the dermis: it's defined by the whole genetic physiological makeover and their specific trademark features. Indian and Latin-American skins are bi-racial Native-American/Caucasian and Asian-Aboriginal/Caucasian, respectively; they have Caucasian features nicely in place (large round eyes with pronounced double-eye lids, sharp square/triangular pointed jaws, etc.), because half their genetic decent comes from European settlers. Africans do not have that: they follow their own lineage of characteristic features, one which is still underrepresented in visual exposure.

The predominant image you've probably seen, as I'm predicting, is Caucasian.

Your brain, in summary, likes dark Indian and Mexican men, because it has learned to like White men.


I don't think it's racist not to be attracted to a certain race.
You're not racist. Your biological brain is. Every human being's is.

But don't be weird, and call us Asians Ching Chongs, LOL.
As much as I agree with you, "Gung ging gah geh Chinng chong cho'zzzzz!!!!!!" is, as I believe, rooted in the very non-preference that many Caucasian people still have for Asians; in the same way you have a non-preference for black folks. Not all Caucasians taunt asian folks, but what taunt does exist is probably greatly owed to their having a non-favor for asian features. See?
 
-be simpler if there was one button to pin to a lapel. Well, if I had a lapel. It could be taken from a writers' quote about new written works.

"Kill all your darlings". While you age you're getting rewritten. People say 'you become more yourself as you age', but personally I think that's only true emotionally, just not so much how people interpret a noun's influence. I found that most of the time, those 'preferences' have not much of a personal base, they'll start shredding themselves if you put in a little effort. That's a kicker, though. Who wants to kill all their darlings when it takes even a modicum of effort.
 
Virulent, you make a fine point.

My response is this: those Dominican and Puerto Rican "Black" men have genetic Latin features in them. And then, 'Latin' has genetically Caucasian features in them. So, the difference is that at least they could be passed as 'exotic' forms of the otherwise allegedly un-interesting (and dully 'ugly') pure African Black: they are helped very indirectly by the Caucasian features that are somewhere hidden but very present in their Latin-side lineage.

In the end, however, I say it as I've said time and again: give exposure a chance, and you will see the surprising turn around. White people who have lived in largely Black populations have a larger attraction to Black men; and I'm not referring specifically to the Latin-exoticized 'Black' men of Latin-American islands.
 
I'm Asian, and I don't find 80% of black men attractive.[/quote:bday:] As a "healed" ex-whitewashed, I'm sorry to say, love: you really don't know what you're missing. As an Asian muscular twink-jock, I'd 'impregnate' any hot African stuff any day!! But hey, Asians like you don't like them. More for me!! :gogirl: :gogirl:

I can't help but think it is. "Skin color" is more than just the mere color-tone of the dermis: it's defined by the whole genetic physiological makeover and their specific trademark features. Indian and Latin-American skins are bi-racial Native-American/Caucasian and Asian-Aboriginal/Caucasian; they have Caucasian features nicely in place (large round eyes with pronounced double-eye lids, sharp square/triangular pointed jaws, etc.), because half their genetic decent comes from European settlers. Africans do not have that: they follow their own lineage of characteristic features, one which is still underrepresented in visual exposure.

The predominant image you've probably seen, as I'm predicting, is Caucasian.

Your brain, in summary, likes dark Indian and Mexican men, because it has learned to like White men.


You're not racist. Your biological brain is. Every human being's is.

As much as I agree with you, "Gung ging gah geh Chinng chong cho'zzzzz!!!!!!" is, as I believe, rooted in the very non-preference that many Caucasian people still have for Asians; in the same way you have a non-preference for black folks. Not all Caucasians taunt asian folks, but what taunt does exist is probably greatly owed to their having a non-favor for asian features. See?

Sorry, but I have the right to like any type of person, sexually, if I like. If a black person, or white person, doesn't like Asian people sexually, who is anyone to force them too? Yes, and this is coming from an Asian person. No need to force someone's hand on something they don't want. Not everything has to be political, some people like things because they just like them. And some people don't prefer something, because they just don't prefer it.

I respect someone's boundaries if someone's not into me, and I don't go stalking them.
 
Back
Top