The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Post Presidential opinions regarding LGBT rights in the future

And here we are again.

After the trans, it will be women, then blacks and hispanics.

Trump is back asking the Supreme Court to uphold his ban on trans people in the military.

Enjoy that piece of pie, Caitlin Jenner.
 
And...

bafkreicpdi7qq6bgo5pdup5maw6yo55a5ms6akenhu5gsuvyzaidvklspi@jpeg
 
And Samuel Alito and the Supreme Court may be banning homo friendly books from schools.....the march towards 'Don't Say Gay' across the USA begins because apparently homophobes can't read.

www.rawstory.com

Supreme Court justice just accidentally 'revealed his own homophobia': analyst

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito leapt into proselytizing from the bench on Wednesday — and in doing so, he "revealed his own homophobia" as well as that he didn't understand the basic plot of the children's book he wants to allow parents to force schools to embargo, court watcher Mark Joseph...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com
 
He wants to kill millions of people and make many more millions suffer needlessly.
If there is such a thing as real evil, Trump is the embodiment of it.

491956410_992380293069621_90850728305852728_n.jpg
 
rareboy said:
And here we are again.

After the trans, it will be women, then blacks and hispanics.

Trump is back asking the Supreme Court to uphold his ban on trans people in the military.

Enjoy that piece of pie, Caitlin Jenner.
Click to expand...
Words come to mind about Jenner and none of 'em are polite. She'll be the last of the first to go, the raging fool
 
And this shit still happens. WTF are State police doing that they have so much time for this?


But I bet that some of the down low members of the force were hoping to get a BJ in the patrol car.

bafkreia2hxhbmbh4yp5nq7pyy4zjrgir7vvgekwcqrnectlcu52eezy2gm@jpeg

www.advocate.com

Pittsburgh police raid LGBTQ+ bar during drag show featuring Amanda Lepore

What the owners of P Town have called a "surprise inspection" has been described by attendees as reminiscent of past police raids of gay establishments.
www.advocate.com www.advocate.com
 
And more seriously:

The SC again sides with TrumpCo. on banning trans people in the military. At least while the case is being heard.

So you can be sure that TrumpCo. will eject them all. Even if the ban is ultimately overturned, the US military will never again be a safe place for trans people.


This type of erasure is so significant that it will end up serving as a wobbly precedent while the case is still being litigated at the lower court. Expect to see the right use it to block trans people in the police and other positions while they can.
 
I suspect it will die in Committee.

But Mike Lee will be able to suck his sponsors' taint and use this in his campaign messaging.

What a godly man, eh?
 
rareboy said:
I suspect it will die in Committee.

But Mike Lee will be able to suck his sponsors' taint and use this in his campaign messaging.

What a godly man, eh?
Click to expand...
And a "Constitutional law expert" and "free speech advocate". :rolleyes:
 
It is about as cynical and performative a piece of silliness as I have seen out of the GQP.

But he knows he can raise a lot of money off this.
 
No surprise it is this judge.

im.jpg
 
And then there is this happening.

im.jpg
 
^ So depressing.

I realize that states can pass their 'don't say gay' laws and the SC won't roll them back.

Nice move for Pride month.
 
smokeshadow said:
](*,)

www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com

'Vindictive Erasure': Hegseth Ripped for Pride Month Order to Rename USNS Harvey Milk

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is kicking off Pride Month by ordering the renaming of the USNS Harvey Milk, one of a number of ships in the John Lewis-class, named for the assassinated LGBTQ civil rights leader who served as a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy in the 1950s. “A defense official...
www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com
Click to expand...
Also in the article:

The Navy is also considering renaming ships named after other prominent civil rights leaders, including the USNS Thurgood Marshall, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Dolores Huerta, USNS Lucy Stone, USNS Cesar Chavez, and USNS Medgar Evers, according to a report by [CBS News.
Click to expand...

I'm not a fan of naming military assets after people who weren't military heroes. Does anyone believe that Harriet Tubman or Ruth Bader Ginsburg would have been happy about something used in a war bearing her name?

Also not a fan of Secretaries of Defense who waste time with performative politics instead of doing their job. He's a security threat. Why haven't they gotten rid of him yet?
 
KaraBulut said:
I'm not a fan of naming military assets after people who weren't military heroes. Does anyone believe that Harriet Tubman or Ruth Bader Ginsburg would have been happy about something used in a war bearing her name?
Click to expand...

Good point.

KaraBulut said:
Why haven't they gotten rid of him yet?
Click to expand...

How many credible alternative candidates would be willing to serve under Trump?
 
unloadonme said:
Good point.
Click to expand...
It reminds me of a politician that I respect who was offered a chance to have a prison named after them. They said, "No. Name a school after me because that's what I want to be remembered for."


unloadonme said:
How many credible alternative candidates would be willing to serve under Trump?
Click to expand...
I don't think Trump is on the market looking for "credible candidates". Otherwise, he wouldn't have 23 former Murdoch employees in his administration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top