To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
 .
 .Looks as tho' the whinging poms were not allowed to trumpet their support in the Gabba:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,23069-2468916,00.html
Brisbane is obviously not a horny place.
Aussies 1/177 2nd innings, as I type this .... lead is 622 .... and it's only the second day!!!
Almost embarrassing, really.



 More to the point, why did Ponting not enforce the follow-on? The Aussies had a lead of 445. As it stands, Ponting has given England a chance - ok, a very slim chance - of saving the match.
  More to the point, why did Ponting not enforce the follow-on? The Aussies had a lead of 445. As it stands, Ponting has given England a chance - ok, a very slim chance - of saving the match.

Third day ozguy.More to the point, why did Ponting not enforce the follow-on? The Aussies had a lead of 445. As it stands, Ponting has given England a chance - ok, a very slim chance - of saving the match.
Perhaps Ricky also thought it was "only the second day"
Or the ABC commentators playing devils advocate sugesting that since the players now get a slice of CA's revenue that another day of 40,000 at the Gabba was in their wallets best interests.
 
 
Ricky Ponting must be regretting his decision not to enforce the follow-on.
He's allowed England back into a game Australia should have won yesterday. He's allowed England to re-group and restore some self-belief and pride.
If England do bat out for a draw tomorrow - unlikely of course, but possible - Ponting's decision will go down in Test history as one of the worst decisions ever made by a Test match captain. And even if Australia win, it is still a decision that defies belief.
 No doubt: they deserved to win the opening Test
 No doubt: they deserved to win the opening Test
 
  
	