The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

White Gay Americans will all vote Republican

Yes. Because by default, if you don't agree with Kane, it is de facto proof that you are a racist white homo. But wait. If you do agree with Kane then it is proof that you are a racist white homo.

Pretty much, when a thread out right claims I'm a racist before I read it then I apologize (not really) that I don't come in with open arms on a discussion. Also, I'd rather commit Seppuku then vote Republican, ever.

Yes, my delivery is less than diplomatic, but it's both purposeful and necessary to encourage debate. Don't expect that to change. Been that way for years.

[Text: Removed]
 
I have seen other groups go to the GOP, the blue collar workers did this and were in effect voting against themselves.
One reason they moved right was because of gay rights.
Where I see your point is in a few posters who complain about those "on the dole" make remarks about the "thugs" or infer that blacks just aren't as smart as other races. There is resentment and as is the way of the GOP, they will dangle that carrot to gays, not as a group, but as "exploited tax payers" who worked to get penalized by having an evil government take their money and give it to those who don't try.
 
There is no such thing as privilege - male, white, straight or whatever other target-du-jour - there are only situations where we can all use our freedoms and situations where there are still problems.

Equal marriage will be removed from the list of problems soon enough throughout the developed world. This is because gay people could count on the support of a population that is more open, better educated, and more dedicated to solving problematic situations than it was even a generation ago.

Then we'll move on to fix the next problem.
 
There is no such thing as privilege - male, white, straight or whatever other target-du-jour - there are only situations where we can all use our freedoms and situations where there are still problems.

Yikes.

....
 
There is no such thing as privilege - male, white, straight or whatever other target-du-jour - there are only situations where we can all use our freedoms and situations where there are still problems.


Oh privilege most certainly exists particularly white privilege in the United States which OP is in an inartful and somewhat racist manner attempting to expose to the light of day.
 
The bottom line is...if you don't know yourself well you can easily be manipulated. Political strategists understand this perfectly...and get paid well to manipulate people to the point where the stupidest fuckers vote against their own interests.

What do you think "Real Americans" actually means?????? Sarah Palin used it all the time...she was race baiting...it means WHITE PEOPLE....and people who are racist can't see it...which is why it works....

Gay men who just want to be "normal" will also be easy to manipulate. Oppressed groups of people oppress each other...and the ones who want approval and want to be viewed as normal the most will be the ones who lead the way. There will be people of color in that group as well FYI. If you play the game...you can be any color and get a seat at the table.
 
Blacks have been taught that Republicans are racist because they do not pander to blacks. BUT democrat policies of abortion, welfare, and massive immigration are hurting blacks more than anything else. Immigrants in general and notably hispanics are doing better than blacks. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/us/report-finds-hispanics-faring-better-than-blacks.html?_r=0

Welfare seems like a good thing to blacks, but with 73% or so of black children being born illegitimate to grow up on welfare, and a third of black boys/men spending time in the penitentiary, maybe dependency is not so great. And, while blacks are given easy abortion, others are given easy immigration. Blacks think democrats gave them affirmative action, but they gave it to all other minorities including immigrants, so it does not mean much to blacks.
Republicans tend to ignore blacks because they have no chance of getting the black vote. Democrats, including Obama, tend to ignore the blacks because they always vote democrat, so it is more important to lure hispanics and other minorities.
 
Oh privilege most certainly exists particularly white privilege in the United States which OP is in an inartful and somewhat racist manner attempting to expose to the light of day.

The thing is, "privilege," isn't.

Racism is not a zero-sum game, where one person's disadvantage equals another person's advantage. It is a negative-sum game, where there are only losers, and greater losers.

Also, if we accepted that privilege was a thing, anyone who thinks equality is the ethical thing to pursue would then be working to make sure everyone has privilege. It's nonsensical.
 
73% of black children are not on welfare. I'd also add that there are actual stats on the engagement of father's with children born out of wedlock and black men hands down are the group that is the most likely to be actively involved in the lives of children whose mother they were not married to.

Now having said that. Diversity increases the intelligence of groups. Black republicans who are not the knuckle dragging homophobic sort are cool in my opinion. As are gay republicans. Both groups if they increase in number can actually force the DNC to take gay folk and black folk seriously in a way that they simply will not if they are guaranteed the votes of said groups regardless of whether their policies help or harm them.
 
The thing is, "privilege," isn't.

Racism is not a zero-sum game, where one person's disadvantage equals another person's advantage. It is a negative-sum game, where there are only losers, and greater losers.

Also, if we accepted that privilege was a thing, anyone who thinks equality is the ethical thing to pursue would then be working to make sure everyone has privilege. It's nonsensical.

Highfalutin and an attempt, maybe a useful attempt, at shifting language. But the realities that are being described by all the privilege talk are, well, REAL. I do agree that racism, sexism, etc harm everyone; but to be honest I'm not certain that anyone other than an academic should be focusing on shifting the language around this. The practical realities of police harassment, higher HIV rates, the achievement gap, etc seem to me to be a better place to focus one's energies. But you're a good guy. Fight your fight.
 
73% of black children are not on welfare. I'd also add that there are actual stats on the engagement of father's with children born out of wedlock and black men hands down are the group that is the most likely to be actively involved in the lives of children whose mother they were not married to.

Quebeckers tend to have stable, engaged-parent, families without marriage.
 
Highfalutin and an attempt, maybe a useful attempt, at shifting language. But the realities that are being described by all the privilege talk are, well, REAL. I do agree that racism, sexism, etc harm everyone; but to be honest I'm not certain that anyone other than an academic should be focusing on shifting the language around this. The practical realities of police harassment, higher HIV rates, the achievement gap, etc seem to me to be a better place to focus one's energies. But you're a good guy. Fight your fight.

The reason I fight the fight is because the language of privilege came out of academia. I watched it happen ever since we've been invited to unpack our imaginary backpacks. It's a stillborn zombie of a word that only catches the imagination of people who've been excluded from something, but the academic roots are ridiculous, and I can't figure out how it would ever be a smart political strategy to convince millions of people that they're on to something good by being able to enjoy their rights while others aren't. MMmmmm! Privilege! Sign me up for gold points! You know, I think maybe I'll keep that card after all!

The term needs to go back to academia to die. And honestly I hold academia accountable to come up with a better replacement.

Oh, and I agree with those practical realities! Those things are exactly the focus of the civil rights/human rights discourse that immediately precedes this doctrine of privilege. Boldly go where we've gone before, and let's end this 20-year detour.
 
The reason I fight the fight is because the language of privilege came out of academia. I watched it happen ever since we've been invited to unpack our imaginary backpacks. It's a stillborn zombie of a word that only catches the imagination of people who've been excluded from something, but the academic roots are ridiculous, and I can't figure out how it would ever be a smart political strategy to convince millions of people that they're on to something good by being able to enjoy their rights while others aren't. MMmmmm! Privilege! Sign me up for gold points! You know, I think maybe I'll keep that card after all!

The term needs to go back to academia to die. And honestly I hold academia accountable to come up with a better replacement.

Oh, and I agree with those practical realities! Those things are exactly the focus of the civil rights/human rights discourse that immediately precedes this doctrine of privilege. Boldly go where we've gone before, and let's end this 20-year detour.

I'm comfortable with the language of privilege and the desire to deconstruct/unpack everything, but I'm a bit of a navel-gazer by nature.
 
73% of black children are not on welfare. I'd also add that there are actual stats on the engagement of father's with children born out of wedlock and black men hands down are the group that is the most likely to be actively involved in the lives of children whose mother they were not married to.

Now having said that. Diversity increases the intelligence of groups. Black republicans who are not the knuckle dragging homophobic sort are cool in my opinion. As are gay republicans. Both groups if they increase in number can actually force the DNC to take gay folk and black folk seriously in a way that they simply will not if they are guaranteed the votes of said groups regardless of whether their policies help or harm them.

73% of black children need not be on welfare, you only have to get dumb ass white idiots to believe that they are.
Right now an increasing number of white children are growing up in households where their parents don't marry. The child stays on Medicaid and the mom gets ADC, if they vote, they in large part vote Republican. Why? Because the Dems. will take their guns, the Dems are only for minorities, the Dems are weak on defense, and on it goes.

A lot of white blue collar guys (I worked with them and lived around them) don't carry auto insurance.
They claim that what they pay in taxes is given to blacks and foreigners in , wait for this... welfare. They don't see ADC for their kids or Medicaid for their kids as welfare.

Bill Clinton said that the era of big government was over, general welfare went with it, but according to these paranoid whites, blacks and foreigners still get welfare, whites can't.

It's not reality, it's what people will believe, the GOP puts out it's bullshit aimed at peoples fears, people take the bait.
 
^ You might want to check again...Noah pointed out that 73% of black children are already NOT on welfare.
 
72.2% of black children were born illegitimate in 2013http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/360990/latest-statistics-out-wedlock-births-roger-clegg
While about half of Americans get some form of welfare.
 
72.2% of black children were born illegitimate in 2013http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/360990/latest-statistics-out-wedlock-births-roger-clegg
While about half of Americans get some form of welfare.

this is true. (i think the latest numbers on what we used to call bastardy are closer to 75% but i don't remember where i got that from)
 
Welfare has been disastrous for blacks.http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1672
But worst of all is that while blacks have been the victims of discrimination, massive immigration has brought other people to work, prosper and climb the economic ladder, leaving the blacks behind. But it is still happening as hispanics and immigrants in general do better thnt blacks. How does the democrat program of massive immigration and amnesty for illegals help blacks? They are still the victims of immigration, but their dependence upon welfare, social programs, and crime, keeps them down where discrimination used to keep them. And blacks vote overwhelmingly for the democrat program of massive immigration.
 
Back
Top