The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Why are gay guys so promiscuous?

Tiger: Obviously it's more difficult to find someone you click with than someone to hump for a single night.

What's so horrible about having fun while you are looking for something more?

You try to justify your view but all I see is a judgmental moral snob.
I'm trying to understand how I've been a "judgmental moral snob." Perhaps you could enlighten me? I merely inquired as to whether it's the norm for gay gays to be more relationship averse and promiscuous. I didn't attach a positive or negative view to promiscuity. In fact, if I recall, I stated several times I'm not judging others and understand both positions. The judgment seems to be coming from your direction mostly.
 
It was such a cheap shot. There are plenty of people who don't find a suitable partner for years without having a single sexual encounter in the meanwhile. The two have nothing to do with each other.

Of course it is possible someone might be enjoying the single life too much to settle down. But to judge someone based on their number of sex partners alone is really harsh and judgmental.
 
No suitable partner prevents this.
I can see you are single. Why ???????????????????
It's hard to find someone to try to start some kind of friendship with without having to pass through the door of initial sex. Even the conversation up to the point of the evening being over seems to be just forced as a necessary evil until the sex occurs. Meeting someone, talking, hanging out, doing fun whatever and then being able to say "want to hang out again?" without having to seal the deal with sex at the end of the night is what I'm looking for. Maybe it doesn't exist. Maybe it does but in a limited amount that will take a good while to find. Either way, I was looking for the viewpoints of others on the topic.
 
Lack of chemistry, circumstances or the simple fact that for most guys anything beyond "one time" means strings attached, which is usually not what I want. And it is usually not what I want not because I am some promiscuous whore, but because I don't connect easily on a level that would allow me to start a relationship. It's not even high standards, I just don't sync with that many people.

That plus I caught him eyeballin the cello player.

I am a jealous God.
 
Well at least we now know your reason for feeling this way about promiscuous people... bitterness.

It does exist. A shame you can't manage to find it. Maybe most guys just don't like your personality that much?
 
It's hard to find someone to try to start some kind of friendship with without having to pass through the door of initial sex. Even the conversation up to the point of the evening being over seems to be just forced as a necessary evil until the sex occurs. Meeting someone, talking, hanging out, doing fun whatever and then being able to say "want to hang out again?" without having to seal the deal with sex at the end of the night is what I'm looking for. Maybe it doesn't exist. Maybe it does but in a limited amount that will take a good while to find. Either way, I was looking for the viewpoints of others on the topic.

Weirdly, I've had many experiences just like what you are describing. I've never felt peer-pressured into making it about sex.
 
Well at least we now know your reason for feeling this way about promiscuous people... bitterness.

It does exist. A shame you can't manage to find it. Maybe most guys just don't like your personality that much?
What the hell is your problem? The only bitterness in this thread is coming from you. I have not attacked a single person on here for their level of sexual interaction with other people. I realize that I can have a difference of opinion with other people without hating them personally. I also realize that my life experience is limited to only what I have experienced. So when I have things like this pop up in my head, I like to get a wide variety of views to help me better understand the world I live in instead of sit bitterly (like some people) in my own limited world of experiences and think everyone is out to get me.

If you want to meaningfully contribute, please do. If not, there has to be something else you could be doing.
 
Perhaps we're hard wired for novelty. Just like straight men.

The more times we have sex with the same person the longer it takes to climax. (if it's really frequent, that is)

Must be something evolutionary. Spreading the seed far and wide was advantageous but difficult to actually do. Now we're like Dolphins (fuck for the fun of it) with Grindr.
 
:rolleyes:

Seriously, no gender or sexual identity is more promiscuous than the other. Some 'types' may be more open about it but the percentages [~40%] of how many people are promiscuous are correct.
 
I think some gay men are promiscious because we are afraid to fall in love with someone. If you start falling for someone that means the individual is now vulnerable and open to being hurt. Nobody wants to get hurt, so some people I am including myself here sleep around because I try to avoid getting hurt.

I have one night stands because I know I will not get emotionally attached to someone. But I know I cannot have sex with a guy over and over again and again and it is just sex if I have feelings for the guy. And the thing about feelings at least for myself is I can't control it it is either there or it is not there.

Sleeping around I think for some gay men is easier than having a deeper emotional connection with someone because there is no emotional ties to the other man.
 
It's hard to find someone to try to start some kind of friendship with without having to pass through the door of initial sex. Even the conversation up to the point of the evening being over seems to be just forced as a necessary evil until the sex occurs. Meeting someone, talking, hanging out, doing fun whatever and then being able to say "want to hang out again?" without having to seal the deal with sex at the end of the night is what I'm looking for. Maybe it doesn't exist. Maybe it does but in a limited amount that will take a good while to find. Either way, I was looking for the viewpoints of others on the topic.

If you want to get past "the door of initial sex" as you call it then you might find that difficult if you're meeting them at one of your homes. Two gay guys, meeting for the first time, alone at one of their houses, unless they're five, are going to have sex. That's just the male sex drive kicking in. Try asking someone out to dinner or something, and make sure you both drive yourselves there. If you both are planning on driving home in your own cars, it makes it a lot less likely that sex is going to happen on the first date.

Another idea would be to get with a group of gay friends, or make your own group. Sex doesn't happen with groups of gay friends either. Some might find this difficult, and it certainly can be so it might not work for everyone.

Also, while I don't believe you're some bitter, unlikable, moral snob, I do think you hold some prejudices regarding sex that seem to bear a Christian(IMO) influence on the subject. Promiscuity is not nessacily something a gay guy is going to do for his entire life. I'm like Roylo, if I'm single I'm going to hook up, but I can get back into a relationship at the drop of a hat if I want to. What makes me capable of that? Because I choose to. Hook ups are only habit forming if you do them out of a fear of commitment, instead of just a funner way of getting off than watching porn. It's really not hard.

And to all you guys out there who need some special connection before you "give yourself" to a fuck, do have a vagina or something? Seriously, the perspective that you lose a part of yourself from sex only makes sense if you're coming from the female genitals. Next time you have sex take a look at your dick afterwards. Are parts of it missing at all? Did he bite off the head or something? Come on guys, we're MEN our genitals are on the outside, sex is an external matter for us, why would you associate it with an internal process like your heart? It makes no sense.

Pay attention to where your heart has been. That is a limited resource for us all, but your cock? Give me a break.
 
This thread needs a song:

;)






You were doing great...until that bit. I hope you weren't serious. :roll:

And if you were...it's still hilarious. :rotflmao:

There's a lot of preaching being done in this thread about understanding people's differences in preferences/comfort/boundaries, etc. when it comes to sex and how (and who and when) they choose to 'share themselves' with others. You're doing a shit job at contributing. ;) Your post isn't far from what you are subtly insinuating that the OP has done.

Hmmm, so are my prejudices, do you think, Christian, anti-Christian, or lapsed Catholic? Any of those could apply to me.

I'm glad you thought the part about biting the head of was funny. It was supposed to be, lol.
 
Also, while I don't believe you're some bitter, unlikable, moral snob, I do think you hold some prejudices regarding sex that seem to bear a Christian(IMO) influence on the subject. Promiscuity is not nessacily something a gay guy is going to do for his entire life. I'm like Roylo, if I'm single I'm going to hook up, but I can get back into a relationship at the drop of a hat if I want to. What makes me capable of that? Because I choose to. Hook ups are only habit forming if you do them out of a fear of commitment, instead of just a funner way of getting off than watching porn. It's really not hard.
I do have my own personal view of when sex is appropriate, but it is definitely not Christian based and I view it as my personal decision. As a less-than-promiscuous person, I think it's a perfectly valid question to ask why gay guys (yes I know studies show all guys, but I'm a gay male and this is a gay board) seem to lean towards the promiscuity part of things since I don't have the experience or though process of the opposing view. I could have phrased the topic better, but this board won't let you go back and change it (and least I haven't found a way to.)

And to all you guys out there who need some special connection before you "give yourself" to a fuck, do have a vagina or something? Seriously, the perspective that you lose a part of yourself from sex only makes sense if you're coming from the female genitals. Next time you have sex take a look at your dick afterwards. Are parts of it missing at all? Did he bite off the head or something? Come on guys, we're MEN our genitals are on the outside, sex is an external matter for us, why would you associate it with an internal process like your heart? It makes no sense.

Pay attention to where your heart has been. That is a limited resource for us all, but your cock? Give me a break.
I will agree with Huntneo that you're sounding exactly like what you were accusing me of. Some people view sex as a mechanical type process that humans go through whenever they have the need to release. Others view it as something special that you can give someone special. Neither side is right or wrong. While I have done hookups before, I try to avoid them because I feel like sex is one of the few things I can give someone special that I don't give to just anyone who happens to know me. That's my personal opinion. Some on here seem to share that and others don't. I don't expect someone like you or Rolyo to change your ways because of how I feel and I hope you wouldn't expect me to do so based on your feelings. I certainly don't believe that dismissing anyone's personal views on what sex is or should mean because they don't line up with what you view it as is a proper course of action.

The responses on here though have definitely clarified some of the questions I had about what others' views on the relationship vs. sex thing were.
 
I do have my own personal view of when sex is appropriate, but it is definitely not Christian based and I view it as my personal decision.

Let's get one thing clear - it IS Christian based. It doesn't matter whether you are Christian yourself, or how important religion is in your life. You are the product of a culture that has been heavily influenced by Christianity for 2000 years. Every aspect of our lives is colored by it, whether we are ourselves believers or not. And yes, sex-guilt and glorifying the sex act ARE Christianity-induced things that did not exist in pre-Christian times.

Some people view sex as a mechanical type process that humans go through whenever they have the need to release. Others view it as something special that you can give someone special. Neither side is right or wrong.

Yeah, and a giant majority of us are in the middle and view it as a pleasurable experience which includes emotional as well as physical connection, in the form of mutual sympathy, chemistry and all sorts of other positive feelings that just so happen to not be romantic. It's not a black/white "mechanical masturbation with someone else's asshole" and "beautiful loving meaningful connection of two souls through the beautiful loving act of beautiful loving sex". I have never had "mechanical" sex. If you have, I am sorry for you, but that's not how casual sex is for me. So yeah, don't diss what you obviously don't know.

How we view sex is a personal thing, but it CAN be changed, like every other outlook we have. Because I can promise you, sex with someone special to me is just as special and meaningful as it is to you. So the difference between the two of us is that I just get laid more :p

- - - Updated - - -

I'm gonna go with love, devotion, and commitment, but hey, what do I know?

No, no, no, it is SO much more important where your dick has been before!
 
Whoa.

You and I are practically twins on this topic.

Honestly, I am (and will continue to be) dumbfounded by folks who continuously find themselves in relationships. I just do not fathom how it is so possible to be so emotionally compatible with so many men. The way I gel with others, there is an incredibly low number of men in the world I'd feel that I'd be able to attain a chemistry with. I would really have to look for a relationship to even find a fitting candidate, and I've never really had a desire to search.

But you say this as though most everyone else gets into 20 relationships a year or something. For me, meeting someone I emotionally bond with is rare. But I can count my relationships on one hand, and most of them lasted at least a year. It sounded like you're referring to serial monogamists or serial daters or something, not people who engage in (for lack of a better term) normal relationships, which will be somewhat rare and probably somewhat spaced out, because of the difficulty in finding the right person.
 
I'm gonna go with love, devotion, and commitment, but hey, what do I know?
Riiiiight, let's look past the fact that you've been with literally hundreds of men. I'm sure your significant other will feel proud walking down the gayborhood street holding hands with you despite the fact some of the random men walking past you have already had you.
 
Riiiiight, let's look past the fact that you've been with literally hundreds of men. I'm sure your significant other will feel proud walking down the gayborhood street holding hands with you despite the fact some of the random men walking past you have already had you.

If that significant other were me I really wouldn't care. I seriously just don't get where your attitude is based off of if not Christianity. Seriously, this sounds like something a chastity speaker would say to group kids in a Catholic High School.
 
If that significant other were me I really wouldn't care. I seriously just don't get where your attitude is based off of if not Christianity. Seriously, this sounds like something a chastity speaker would say to group kids in a Catholic High School.
One big alternative to forming a position on this topic other than Christianity is health. Statistically speaking, the more people you have sex with, the more your chances of getting an STD or adverse health effects goes up.
 
Back
Top