^ If you've actually been to a rodeo and didn't care for it, then I have nothing to say....
PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Liberals who look down on Nascar, have probably never been to a race.
^ I live in a Liberal Paradise, surrounded by that sort. They control all.
I couldn't spit without hitting one. They're everywhere.
Many are even friends of mine....
P.S. The commas were added for dramatic effect, to slow down the reader so that he/she might comprehend.![]()
The rodeo is the only thing I haven't experienced to any degree whatsoever. :c)
Only trying to focus you back to the original topic ; don't want you digressing from the thread topiclol
I'm not needing your, let's call it, assistance.
We're all part of the problem. We all think we're right, and we can all be condescending. Liberals, however, have a special brand of condescension that is might bit more infuriating.
Given that half of your post was an example of the thread's thesis and the other half could be considered off-topic, maybe you are (needing, that is).
What the hell I gotta do? I thought I kilt this damn thread and now it looks like a cat box dust up may be imminent![]()
Liberals who mock Wal-Mart shoppers, have probably never been to the store.
Liberals who look down on Nascar, have probably never been to a race.
Liberals who ridicule rodeo, have most likely never seen one.
Liberals who put down faith and belief, don't know what it's like to have either.
Liberals who think working class is low class, probably lived on the largesse of their parents or the government to get through school.
Liberals who put down the South or the Midwest, have probably never travelled to either region.
Etc., etc., etc.,
This is the sort of condescension Liberals practice, but are blind to.

Liberals who mock Wal-Mart shoppers, have probably never been to the store.
Liberals who look down on Nascar, have probably never been to a race.
Liberals who ridicule rodeo, have most likely never seen one.
Liberals who put down faith and belief, don't know what it's like to have either.
Liberals who think working class is low class, probably lived on the largesse of their parents or the government to get through school.
Liberals who put down the South or the Midwest, have probably never travelled to either region.
Etc., etc., etc.,
This is the sort of condescension Liberals practice, but are blind to.
Funniest response yet!
Thanks for being an example.
You're doing a damn good job of proving how condescending liberals can be. Now go off in your corner and judge other people. The rest of us will have a nice conversation without your nonsense.
I take no instruction from you, Droid.

Nice try, Kulindahr. (Really.)
No shit.
However, you're getting a taste of your own condescension. How does it feel? Does it raise your hackles and make you angry? Do you like being treated like a child? Because that's pretty much how you've been treating your fellow members.
Now run off and let the adults play.![]()
But look at what else is on the Post Op-Ed Page today. The Post's CIA spokesman, David Ignatius, writes a column arguing that Europe is in desperate need of a "tea party movement," which would do all the great things for Europeans that it is doing for the U.S. The pro-war Post Editorial Page excitedly announces a "Showdown in Tehran," calling -- yet again -- on the Obama administration to do more to confront and subvert Iran's government. George Will touts a GOP resurgence in California. And earlier this week, it was revealed that Post editors actively solicited someone to write an Op-Ed complaining that liberals -- unlike conservatives -- are arrogant, condescending, and smug.








