Sammie13
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2005
- Posts
- 2,115
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 0
Re: 15 States to Watch in the US Presidential Elec
You know, as I read Snapcat's dire 269-269 electoral sister-kissing result...and that may be optimistic...I realize how far Dems have fallen this year. Hopefully, the debates will help turn this around for Obama, but he is is in such a freefall that if he doesn't turn the ship around, we could be looking at the Titanic...and a McCain landslide.
Funny thing is...I was nostaligic and was recently reading some of the posts in B'back's "Who Should be Veep" thread that ran for like 8 months. As we debated Veeps, so many folks dropped in, including myself, to posts reminders that Vice Presidents don't count...that they are almost irrelevant in regards to an election and that a VP hasn't made an election difference since LBJ in 1960 joining JFK. Now, as we look at this election of '08, it was that question that B'back posed, "Who Should be Veep?" that has been the defining moment in this election. Obama went the traditional route...be wise, show solid judgement in a traditional older man who can do no harm. I think Obama had short-sighted objectives: show you can make a good choice, and then move on in the campaign because it's ultimately about me (not the VP). Then, McCain blew Americans away....a grand slam that showed boldness and courage and left a lasting, re-defining message. He used a counter-strategy by grabbing a mega-large swing voter segment and yet secured and motivated his base at the same time. And he stole the attention from Obama, which had proven so difficult for McCain and Hillary previously. Palin took the shine off of Obama. And I go back to B'back question, "who should be Veep?" and realize all of McCain's brilliance in his VP decison would have never come to fruition if Obama had simply answered that question differently....will this prove to be a blunder for the history books?
You know, as I read Snapcat's dire 269-269 electoral sister-kissing result...and that may be optimistic...I realize how far Dems have fallen this year. Hopefully, the debates will help turn this around for Obama, but he is is in such a freefall that if he doesn't turn the ship around, we could be looking at the Titanic...and a McCain landslide.
Funny thing is...I was nostaligic and was recently reading some of the posts in B'back's "Who Should be Veep" thread that ran for like 8 months. As we debated Veeps, so many folks dropped in, including myself, to posts reminders that Vice Presidents don't count...that they are almost irrelevant in regards to an election and that a VP hasn't made an election difference since LBJ in 1960 joining JFK. Now, as we look at this election of '08, it was that question that B'back posed, "Who Should be Veep?" that has been the defining moment in this election. Obama went the traditional route...be wise, show solid judgement in a traditional older man who can do no harm. I think Obama had short-sighted objectives: show you can make a good choice, and then move on in the campaign because it's ultimately about me (not the VP). Then, McCain blew Americans away....a grand slam that showed boldness and courage and left a lasting, re-defining message. He used a counter-strategy by grabbing a mega-large swing voter segment and yet secured and motivated his base at the same time. And he stole the attention from Obama, which had proven so difficult for McCain and Hillary previously. Palin took the shine off of Obama. And I go back to B'back question, "who should be Veep?" and realize all of McCain's brilliance in his VP decison would have never come to fruition if Obama had simply answered that question differently....will this prove to be a blunder for the history books?











).








